Cover not available
Article published In:
Animal-Computer Interfaces: Novel Approaches for Studying Animal Behavior, Cognition and Communication
Edited by Irene M. Pepperberg
[Interaction Studies 24:2] 2023
► pp. 225–256

Systematic iterative design of interactive devices for animals

Guidance and reflections

ORCID logo | University of Glasgow
The numerous systems designed to facilitate animals’ use of computers often are specific to the animals involved, their unique context, and the applications – enrichment among them. Hence, several development methods have arisen in parallel, largely transposed from the human-computer interaction (HCI) domain. In light of that prior work, the paper presents a step-by-step guide for iteratively designing and constructing interactive computers for animals, informed by the rich history of HCI yet applying animal-centred principles, to enrich animal-computer interaction. For each stage in the iterative design (requirements, ideation, prototyping, and testing), the author reflects on real-world experience of building interactive devices for various animals. The paper concludes with overarching considerations vital for future practice of developing interactive computers for animals. Thus, it serves as a valuable reference and information source for researchers designing novel computer systems for animals.
Keywords: iterative design, interactive devices for animals, animal-computer interaction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Iterative design
    • 2.1Iterative design with animals
    • 2.2Iterative design with animals, from theory to practice
    • 2.3An iterative design model for developing technology for animals
  • 3.Requirements
    • 3.1Compiling the requirements: Lessons learned
  • 4.Ideation
    • 4.1Key lessons from ideation experience
  • 5.Prototyping
    • 5.1Insight related to prototyping
  • 6.Testing and analysis
    • 6.1Lessons for testing and analysis
  • 7.Key considerations in iterative design for animals
  • 8.Conclusions
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.22045.hir
References (76)
References
Agassi, J. (2018). Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations: An attempt at a critical rationalist appraisal. Springer. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcaidinho, J., Freil, L., Kelly, T., Marland, K., Wu, C., Wittenbrook, B., … Jackson, M. (2017). Mobile collaboration for human and canine police explosive detection teams. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (p. 925–933). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aspling, F., & Juhlin, O. (2017, February). Theorizing animal-computer interaction as machinations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 98 (C), 135–149. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, D., Nilsson, J. R., & Griffen, B. D. (2021). The development of animal personality across ontogeny: A cross-species review. Animal Behaviour, 173 1, 137–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In CHI ’03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 225–232). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J., McCarthy, C., & Chua, C. (2019). Exploration of technology requirements for the assistance canine training industry. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AnimalComputer Interaction. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, N., Griffin, G., & Gauthier, C. (2009). The welfare of animals used in science: How the ‘Three Rs’ ethic guides improvements. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 50 (5), 523–530.Google Scholar
French, F., Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Väätäjä, H. (2021). Designing technologies for playful interspecies communication. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on animal-computer interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, F., Mancini, C., & Sharp, H. (2015). Designing interactive toys for elephants. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (p. 523–528). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Exploring methods for interaction design with animals: A case-study with Valli. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Exploring research through design in animal computer interaction. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on animal-computer interaction. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). High tech cognitive and acoustic enrichment for captive elephants. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 300 1, 173–183. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
(2020). More than human aesthetics: Interactive enrichment for elephants. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (p. 1661–1672). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Concept craft cards: Deck of theoretical and practical suggestions for ACI developers. In C&C ’21: Creativity and Cognition. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? In CHI ’12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 937–946). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, S., Clark, F., Burgess, K., Metcalfe, T., Kadijevic, A., Cater, K., & Bennett, P. (2018). Gorilla game lab: Exploring modularity, tangibility and playful engagement in cognitive enrichment design. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillaert, K., & Camenzind, S. (2016). Unleashed enthusiasm: Ethical reflections on harms, benefits, and animal-centered aims of ACI. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Gray, S., & Piitulainen, R. (2021). ZooDesign: Methods for understanding and facilitating children’s education at zoos. In Interaction design and children (p. 204–215). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Kankaanpää, V. (2021). Exploring how white-faced sakis control digital visual enrichment systems. Animals, 11 (2). Retrieved from [URL]
(2022). Do monkeys want audio or visual stimuli? Interactive computers for choice with white-faced sakis in zoos. In DIS ’22: Designing Interactive Systems Conference (p. 1497–1511). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Lucero, A. (2019). On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog… unless you’re another dog. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Forming the dog internet: Prototyping a dog-to-human video call device. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5 1(ISS). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Piitulainen, R. (2021). Developing zoo technology requirements for white-faced saki monkeys. ACI ’20: International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Pons, P., Read, J., & Jaen, J. (2018, Jun). Seven years after the manifesto: Literature review and research directions for technologies in animal computer interaction. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2 (2), 30. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Read, J. C. (2016). Using behavioural information to help owners gather requirements from their dogs’ responses to media technology. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human-Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion! BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). DoggyVision: Examining how dogs (Canis familiaris) interact with media using a dog-driven proximity tracker device. Animal Behaviour Cognition, 5 1, 388–405. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Read, J. C., & Cassidy, B. (2017). A dog centred approach to the analysis of dogs’ interactions with media on tv screens. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98 1, 208–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirskyj-Douglas, I., & Webber, S. (2021). Reflecting on methods in animal computer interaction: Novelty effect and habituation. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., & Arita, K. (1994). Iterative design of seamless collaboration media. Communications of the ACM, 37 (8), 83–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kankaanpää, V. (2021). Interaction design for the unknown (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aalto University.
Kankaanpää, V., & Hirskyj-Douglas, I. (2023). Prototyping with monkeys: Uncovering what buttons for monkeys look like. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaygan, P., & Yargin, G. T. (2019). Design for the well-being of domestic animals: Implementation of a three-stage user research model. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24 (3), 12–30.Google Scholar
Khan, J. A., Rehman, I. U., Khan, Y. H., Khan, I. J., & Rashid, S. (2015). Comparison of requirement prioritization techniques to find best prioritization technique. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 7(11), 53–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinberger, R., Cunha, J. C., Vemuri, M. M., & Hirskyj-Douglas, I. (2023). Birds of a feather videoflock together: Design and evaluation of an agency-based parrot-to-parrot video-calling system for interspecies ethical enrichment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Muramatsu, K., Okuno, J., Nakamura, K., Fujiwara, A., & Saito, K. (2015). Playful rocksalt system: Animal-computer interaction design in wild environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, S., Kirman, B., & Linehan, C. (2016, June). Power, participation, and the dog internet. Interactions, 23 (4), 37–41. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, S., Kirman, B., Linehan, C., Feltwell, T., & Hopkins, L. (2015). Problematising upstream technology through speculative design: The case of quantified cats and dogs. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems (p. 2663–2672). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makinde, A., Islam, M. M., & Scott, S. D. (2019). Opportunities for ACI in PLF: Applying animaland user-centred design to precision livestock farming. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mancini, C. (2011, July). Animal-computer interaction: A manifesto. Interactions, 18 (4), 69–73. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Animal-computer interaction (ACI): Changing perspective on HCI, participation and sustainability. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 2227–2236). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Towards an animal-centred ethics for animal-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98 1, 221–233. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Martin, C. F., & Shumaker, R. W. (2018). Computer tasks for great apes promote functional naturalism in a zoo setting. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on animalcomputer interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, B. (1994). Challenges of HCI design and implementation. Interactions, 1 (1), 73–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
North, S., Hall, C., Roshier, A., & Mancini, C. (2015). HABIT: Horse Automated Behaviour Identification Tool – a position paper. Retrieved from [URL]
North, S., & Mancini, C. (2016). Frameworks for ACI: Animals as stakeholders in the design process. Interactions, 23 (4), 34–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noz, F., & An, J. (2011). Cat Cat Revolution: An interspecies gaming experience. In CHI ’11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 2661–2664). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paci, P., Mancini, C., & Price, B. A. (2017). The role of ethological observation for measuring animal reactions to biotelemetry devices. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (pp. 51:1–5:121). ACM. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Wearer-centered design for animal biotelemetry: Implementation and wearability test of a prototype. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (p. 177–185). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piitulainen, R., & Hirskyj-Douglas, I. (2020). Music for monkeys: Building methods to design with white-faced sakis for animal-driven audio enrichment devices. Animals, 10 (10), Paper 1768. Retrieved from [URL]
Pons, P., & Jaen, J. (2017). Designing interspecies playful interactions: Studying children perceptions of games with animals. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rault, J.-L., Webber, S., & Carter, M. (2015). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on animal welfare science and animal-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riek, L. D. (2012, jul). Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1 (1), 119–136. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritvo, S. E., & Allison, R. S. (2014). Challenges related to nonhuman animal-computer interaction: Usability and ‘liking’. In ACE ’14 Workshops: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L., & Margulis, S. W. (2014). The effects of auditory enrichment on gorillas. Zoo Biology, 33 (3), 197–203. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C., & Torjussen, A. (2020). Canine co-design: Investigating buttons as an input modality for dogs. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (p. 1673–1685). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C. L., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., & Harris, R. (2014). Canine-centered interface design: Supporting the work of diabetes alert dogs. In CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 3757–3766). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruge, L., Cox, E., Mancini, C., & Luca, R. (2018). User centered design approaches to measuring canine behavior: Tail wagging as a measure of user experience. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on animal-computer interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siguln, M., Blanco, T., Rossano, F., & Casas, R. (2021). Modular e-collar for animal telemetry: An animal-centered design proposal. Sensors, 22 (1), 300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Summers, K., Knudtzon, K., Weeks, H., Kaplan, N., Chisik, Y., Kulkarni, R., & Moulthrop, S. (2003). Contextual inquiry into children’s reading: Working with children as research partners. In Proceedings of the UPA Conference 2003.Google Scholar
Sumpter, D. J. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361 (1465), 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, D. (2022). Animal-centered design needs dignity: A critical essay on ACI’s core concept. In ACI ’22: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, D., & Zamansky, A. (2017). Agile with animals: Towards a development method. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) (pp. 423–426). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veasey, J. S. (2019). Assessing the psychological priorities for optimising captive Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) welfare. Animals, 10 (1), 39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, S., Carter, M., Sherwen, S., Smith, W., Joukhadar, Z., & Vetere, F. (2017). Kinecting with orangutans: Zoo visitors’ empathetic responses to animals’ use of interactive technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 6075–6088). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, S., Carter, M., Smith, W., & Vetere, F. (2017). Interactive technology and human-animal encounters at the zoo. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98 1, 150–168. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
(2020). Co-designing with orangutans: Enhancing the design of enrichment for animals. In Proceedings of the 2020 acm designing interactive systems conference (p. 1713–1725). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, S., Cobb, M. L., & Coe, J. (2022). Welfare through competence: A framework for animal-centric technology design. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9 1. Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Weilenmann, A., & Juhlin, O. (2011). Understanding people and animals: The use of a positioning system in ordinary human-canine interaction. In CHI ’11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 2631–2640). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westerlaken, M., & Gualeni, S. (2014). Grounded Zoomorphism: An evaluation methodology for ACI design. In ACE ’14 Workshops: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Becoming with: Towards the inclusion of animals as participants in design processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wirman, H., & Zamansky, A. (2016, jun). Toward characterization of playful ACI. Interactions, 23 (4), 47–51. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamanashi, Y., Hitoosa, K., Yoshida, N., Kano, F., Ikkatai, Y., & Sakamoto, H. (2022). Do chimpanzees enjoy a virtual forest? A pilot investigation of the use of interactive art as a form of environmental enrichment for zoo-housed chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 84 (10), e23343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamansky, A., Roshier, A., Mancini, C., Collins, E. C., Hall, C., Grillaert, K., … Wirman, H. (2017). A report on the first international workshop on research methods in animal-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (p. 806–815). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamansky, A., van der Linden, D., & Baskin, S. (2017). Pushing boundaries of re: Requirement elicitation for non-human users. In 2017 ieee 25th international requirements engineering conference (re) (pp. 406–411). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeagler, C., Zuerndorfer, J., Lau, A., Freil, L., Gilliland, S., Starner, T., & Jackson, M. M. (2016). Canine computer interaction: Towards designing a touchscreen interface for working dogs. In Proceedings of the third international conference on animal-computer interaction. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved from DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kankaanpää, Vilma, Fay E Clark & Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas
2024. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.