Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Animal-Computer Interfaces: Novel Approaches for Studying Animal Behavior, Cognition and Communication
Edited by Irene M. Pepperberg
[Interaction Studies 24:2] 2023
► pp. 193–200
Introduction

Animal-computer interfaces

Novel approaches for studying animal behavior, cognition and communication

ORCID logo | Boston University
The field of animal-computer interfaces has a longer history than one might at first suppose. In this Introduction, I first discuss some of the early attempts to integrate computers into the study of animal cognition, communication, and behavior and how they provided the groundwork for subsequent research in nonhuman-computer interfaces. I then summarize the various contributions to this special issue, emphasizing how they provide a snapshot into the current state of the field. I close by emphasizing the value of this work but also by suggesting some potential pitfalls of which we must also be aware.
Keywords: animal-computer interfaces, Interspecies Internet Workshop
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background for this issue
  • 3.A summary of articles in this issue
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 3 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.23018.pep
References (15)
References
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hulse, S. H., Fowler, H., & Honig, W. K. (1978). Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Halsted Press.Google Scholar
Labudde, S. (1990). Our war against our water. Serial-HSUS News 1989–93, 35 (2), Article 6. [URL]
Mancini, C. (2011). Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. ACM Interactions, 18 (4), 69–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. (1893–1910). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. From J. Buchler (Ed.) (1955). The philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover. In Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in Biosemiotics. Springer.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M., Blumberg, B., Resner, B., Lynn, S., & Mallet, J. (2001). Woofers and Tweeters, Paper presented at the MIT Media Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Reiss, D. (1981). Pragmatics of human-dolphin communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44 1, 356B. (University Microfilms No. 83–11642). DOI logo
Reiss, D., & McCowan, B. (1993). Spontaneous vocal mimicry and production by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): evidence for vocal learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107 (3), 301–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Resner, B. I. (2001). Rover@Home: Computer mediated remote interaction for dogs. MS dissertation, Media Arts and Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Rumbaugh, D. M. (1977). Language learning by a chimpanzee: the LANA project. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rumbaugh, D. M., von Glasersfeld, E. C., Warner, H., Pisani, P., Gill, T. V., Brown, J. V., & Bell, C. L. (1973). A computer-controlled language training system for investigating the language skills of young apes. Behavior Research Methodology and Instrumentation, 5 1, 385–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. (1979). The sign and its masters. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. von. ([1909] 1985). Umwelt and the inner world of animals. In C. J. Mellor, D. Gove, & G. M. Burghardt (Eds.) Foundations of comparative ethology (pp. 222–245). Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Vonk, J., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). (2019). Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar