Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 117/118 (1997) ► pp.85–115

Self-Repair in L1 and L2 Production

an Overview

 | Cito, National Institute for Educational Measurement
 | University of Amsterdam and University of Nijmegen
 | University of Amsterdam and University of Nijmegen
In this article we will give an overview of the findings of L1 and L2 self-repair studies to date. A comparison between L1 and L2 self-repair research shows that, while L1 studies are firmly based in theory, most L2 studies are not. In order to contribute to theories and models of L2 production and acquisition, L2 self-repair studies will have to be more theory-driven than has been the case so far. Moreover, it is essential that large-scale investigations be conducted which focus on self-repair by L2 speakers at different levels of proficiency as well as on intra-individual comparisons between L1 and L2 self-repair.
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.117-118.05van
References (37)
References
BERG, T. 1986 : The aftermath of error occurrence : psycholinguistic evidence from cut-offs. Language and Communication, 61, 195–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BLACKMER, R. and MITTON, J. 1991 : Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 391, 173–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BRÉDART, S. 1991 : Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 201, 123–138.Google Scholar
CHANEY, C. 1992 : Language development, metalinguistic skills, and print awareness in 3-year-old children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 131, 485–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CLARK, E. 1982 : Language change during language acquisition. In Lamb, M. and Brown, A., editors, Advances in developmental psychology (vol 21). Hillsdale (N.J.) : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
CLARK, E. and ANDERSEN, E. 1979 : Spontaneous repairs : awareness in the process of acquiring language. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco, March 15-19, 1979.Google Scholar
CUTLER, A., editor, 1982 : Slips of the tongue and language production. Berlin : Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 : Speakers' conceptions of the function of prosody. In Cutler, A. and Ladd, D., editors, Prosody : models and measurements. Berlin/ Heidelberg/ New York/ Tokyo : Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DE BOT, K. 1992 : A bilingual production model : Levelt's 'speaking' model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 131, 1–24.Google Scholar
DE BOT, K. and SCHREUDER, R. 1993 : Word production and the bilingual lexicon. In Schreuder, R. and Weltens, B., editors, The bilingual lexicon. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DIETRICH, R. 1982 : Selbstkorrekturen. Fallstudien zum mündlichen Gebrauch des Deutschen als Fremdsprache durch Erwachsene. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 121, 120–151.Google Scholar
EVANS, M. 1985 : Self-initiated speech repairs : a reflection of communicative monitoring in young children. Developmental Psychology, 211, 365–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FATHMAN, A. 1980 : Repetition and correction as an indication of speech planning and execution processes among second language learners. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M., editors, Towards a cross-linguistic assessment of speech production. Frankfurt/Bern/Cirencester : Lang, 77–85.Google Scholar
FROMKIN, V., editor, 1973 : Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague : Mouton.Google Scholar
, editor, 1980 : Errors in linguistic performance. Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York : Academic Press.Google Scholar
GARRETT, M. 1975 : The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G., editor, Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 91). New York : Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HIEKE, A. 1981 : A context-processing view of hesitation phenomena. Language and Speech, 241, 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. 1986 : From meta-processes to conscious access : evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 231, 95–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KARMILOFF-SMITH, A., JOHNSON, H., GRANT, H., JONES, M., KARMILOFF, Y., BARTRIP, J. and CUCKLE, P. 1993 : From sentential to discourse functions : detection and explanation of speech repairs by children and adults. Discourse Processes, 161, 565–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LENNON, P. 1990 : Investigating fluency in EFL : a quantitative approach. Language Learning, 401, 387–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 : Self-correction and error in advanced learner spoken narrative. In Bartelt, G., editor, The Dynamics of Language Processes. Essays in honor of Hans W. Dechert. Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
LEVELT, W. 1983 : Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 141, 41–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 : Speaking. Erom intention to articulation. Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press.Google Scholar
MACKAY, D. 1987 : The organization of perception and action : a theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York : Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MERINGER, R. 1908 : Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin : Behr.Google Scholar
NOOTEBOOM, S. 1980 : Speaking and unspeaking : detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In Fromkin, V., editor, Errors in linguistic performance. New York : Academic Press, 87–95.Google Scholar
O'CONNOR, N. 1988 : Repairs as indicative of interlanguage variation and change. Georgetown University Round Table 1988, 251–259.Google Scholar
POULISSE, N., and BONGAERTS, Th. 1994 : First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 151, 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
POULISSE, N., and VAN HEST, E. unpublished manuscript : Lexical bias in L2 learners' speech errors.
ROGERS, S. 1978 : Self-initiated corrections in the speech of infant-school children. Journal of Child Language, 51, 365–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SELIGER, H. 1980 : Utterance planning and correction behavior : its function in the grammar construction process for second language learners. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M., editors, Towards a cross-linguistic assessment of speech production. Frankrurt/ Bern/ Cirencester : Lang, 87–99.Google Scholar
TEMPLE, L. 1992 : Disfluencies in learner speech. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 151, 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VAN WIJK, C. and KEMPEN, G. 1987 : A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech : evidence from experimentally elicited corrections. Cognitive Psychology, 191, 403–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VERHOEVEN, L. 1989 : Monitoring in children's second language speech. Second Language Research, 51, 141–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WIESE, R. 1982 : Psycholinguistische Aspekte der Sprachproduktion : Sprechverhalten und Verbalisierungsprozesse. Düsseldorf : Dissertation Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
1984 : Language production in foreign and native languages : same or different? In Dechert, H., Möhle, D. and Raupach, M., editors, Second language productions. Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag, 11–25.Google Scholar
WUNEN, F. 1990 : On the development of language production mechanisms. Dissertation : University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Cao, Fei
2024. The Relationship Between Oral Fluency and Conversational Self-Repair Among L2 Chinese Learners. Sage Open 14:4 DOI logo
Belz, Malte & Carolin Odebrecht
2022. Abschnittsweise Analyse sprachlicher Flüssigkeit in der Lernersprache: Das Ganze ist weniger informativ als seine Teile. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Kristina Zaides, Tatiana Verkhovtceva, Marianna Beradze & Natalia Meir
2022. Self-Repair in Elicited Narrative Production in Speakers of Russian as the First (L1), Second (L2), and Heritage (HL) Language. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Delli, Rami Maher, Jagdish Kaur, Siew Mei Pauline Lai & Francisco Perlas Dumanig
2022. Self-Repair Practices in Pharmacist-Patient Interaction and their Role in Preventing Misunderstanding and Maintaining Medication Safety. Respectus Philologicus :41(46) ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2022. Cut-offs and co-occurring gestures: Similarities between speakers’ first and second languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:3 ► pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Simard, Daphnée, Annie Bergeron, Yong Gang Liu, Marie Nader & Leslie Redmond
2016. Production d’autoreformulations autoamorcées en langue seconde : rôle de l’attention et de la mémoire phonologique. The Canadian Modern Language Review 72:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Simpson, Rebecca, Susana Eisenchlas & Michael Haugh
2013. The functions of self‐initiated self‐repair in the second language Chinese classroom1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Rieger, Caroline L.
2003. Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 35:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Eleftheriadou, Martha & Richard Badger
1999. Some aspects of repair in native and non-native speaker conversations in English. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 125-126 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Kormos, J
1999. The effect of speaker variables on the self-correction behaviour of L2 learners. System 27:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.