Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 119/120 (1998) ► pp.79–89
Vol. 119/120 (1998) ► pp.79–89
Linguistic Minority Children's Knowledge of multiple Word Meanings; Polysemy and the Testing of lexical Skills
It is often observed that minority children's lexical proficiency in the majority language lags behind that of majority children. This observations is substantiated by scores on vocabulary tests. However, in these (traditional) tests words are generally treated as having one meaning, while most words are polysemous, i.e. they have multiple meanings. A new test was designed to measure the knowledge of multiple word meanings of minority and majority children. Results pointed to a rather high correlation between the scores on a traditional vocabulary test and the newly developed test for the minority children. Furthermore, the minority children scored lower on the new test than the majority children, which suggests that they not only have a lexical deficit in their second language with respect to the number of words known, but also with respect to the number of meanings attached to each word.
References
APPEL, R.
(1988) : The language education of immigrant workers’ children in The Netherlands. In and T. and Skutnabb-Kangas & J. and Cummins (Eds.), Minority Education. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters, 57–78.
BOOGAARD, M., DAMHUIS, R., DE GLOPPER, K. & VAN DEN BERGH, H.
(1990) : De Nederlandse taalvaardigheid van allochtone en Nederlandse kleuters. Amsterdam/Liss : Swets & Zeitlinger.
CARAMAZZA, A. & GROBER, E.
(1976) : Polysemy and the structure of the subjective lexicon. In C. and Rameh (Ed.), Semantics : Theory and application. Washington DC : Georgetown University Press (GURT 1976), 181–206.
CRONBACH, L.J.
(1942) : An analysis of techniques for diagnostic vocabulary testing. Journal of Educational Research, 361, 206–217. 
CURTIS, M.E.
(1987) : Vocabulary testing and vocabulary instruction. In M.G. McKeown & M.E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 37–51.
DOLCH, E.W. & LEEDS, D.
(1953) : Vocabulary tests and depth of meaning. Journal of Educational Research, 471, 179–189.
DROMI, E.
(1987) : Early lexical development. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
DURKIN, K., CROWTHER, R., SHIRE, B., RIEM, R. & NASH, P.R.G.
(1985) : Polysemy in mathematical and musical education. Applied Linguistics, 61, 147–161.
LYONS, J.
(1981) : Language and linguistics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
MASON, J.M., KNISELEY, E. & KENDALL, J.
(1979) : Effects of polysemous words on sentence comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 151, 49–65.
MCCARTHY, M.
(1990) : Vocabulary. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
ULLMANN, S.
(1962) : Semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
VERHALLEN, M.
(1994) : Lexicale vaardigheid van Turkse en Nederlandse kinderen. PhD Thesis University of Amsterdam.
VERHOEVEN, L. & VERMEER, A.
(1985) : Ethnic group differences in children’s oral proficiency of Dutch. In G. Extra & T. Vallen (Eds.). Ethnic minorities and Dutch as a second language. Dordrecht : Foris Publ., 105–132.
(1993): Taaltoets Allochtone Kinderen Bovenbouw. Tilburg: Zwijsen.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Cartwright, Kelly B., Ana Taboada Barber & Casey J. Archer
2022. What’s the Difference? Contributions of Lexical Ambiguity, Reading Comprehension, and Executive Functions to Math Word Problem Solving in Linguistically Diverse 3rd to 5th Graders. Scientific Studies of Reading 26:6 ► pp. 565 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.