Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 135/136 (2002) ► pp.37–60

Knowledge of expletive and pronominal subjects by learners of Spanish

| Department of Language & Linguistics University of Essex
Abstract A number of studies investigating second language acquisition (SLA) from the perspective of Principles and Parameters Theory (P&P, CHOMSKY, 1981, 1995) have focused on the pro-drop parameter, and have argued that older second language learners are sensitive to the different, properties it purportedly covers (e.g., AL-KASEY & PÉREZ-LEROUX, 1998; LICERAS, 1989; PHINNEY, 1987; WHITE, 1986). In this paper we extend this work by investigating two of its syntactic corollaries, namely, referential pronominal subjects (ProS) and expletive pronominal subjects (ExpS). In so-called [+pro-drop] languages both may be realised as an empty element (pro). While on the surface these forms are identical, referential subject pro is different from expletive subject pro both syntactically and semantically; syntactically because referential pro co-exists with a set of overt subject pronouns (yo 'I' , tú 'you', etc), whereas there are no overt expletive pronouns; semantically because referential pro is distinguished for 3 persons, number and gender features, whereas expletive pro would appear to be a third person, singular, gender-neutral pronoun. We will examine whether older L2 learners are sensitive to these differences by using paired grammaticality judgement tests (PGJT). Results are consistent with the claim that learners have different mental representations for ProS and ExpS.
Published online: 1 January 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.135-136.02loz
References (27)
References
AL-KASEY, T. and PÉREZ-LEROUX, A.T. (1998). Second language acquisition of Spanish null subjects. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono and W. O'Neil (Eds). The generative study of second language acquisition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
BINI, M. (1993). La adquisición del italiano: más alla de las propiedades sintácticas del parámetro pro-drop. In J. M. Liceras (Ed). La lingüística y el análisis de los sistemas no nativos. Ottawa: Dovehouse.Google Scholar
CHOMSKY, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986). Knowledge of Language: its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
CHOMOSKY, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
CHRISTIE, K. and LANTOLF, J.P. (1992). The ontological status of learner grammaticality judgments in UG approaches to L2 acquisition. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 24(3): 31-57.Google Scholar
COOK, V.J. (1986). The basis for an experimental approach to Second Language Learning. In V.J. Cook. (Ed). Experimental Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
DAVIES, W.D. (1996). Morphological uniformity and the null subject parameter in adult SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181:475-493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DEMONTE, V. (1991). Teoría sintáctica: de las estructuras a la rección. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
GONZALEZ, M., KETTLE, L., and PLACENCIA, M.E. (1995). Sueños World Spanish. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar
HAEGEMAN, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
HYAMS, N. (1987). The theory of parameters and syntactic development. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds). Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
JAEGGLI, O. (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
LICERAS, J.M. (1989). On some properties of the "pro-drop" parameter: looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In S.M. Gass and J. Schachter (Eds). Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 109-133). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LICERAS, J.M. and DÍAZ, L. (1999). Topic-drop versus pro-drop: null subjects and pronominal subjects in the Spanish L2 of Chinese, English, French, German and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research, 15(1): 1-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LOZANO POZO, C. (1999). A cross linguistic study of second language learning. University of Hertfordshire, UK. Unpublished MA dissertation.Google Scholar
LUJÂN, M. (1999). Expresión y omisión del pronombre personal. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (Eds). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
MOLINA VALERO, J.M. (1997). Procesos implícitos y explícitos en la fijación de parámetros de una segunda lengua. Universidad de Granada, Spain. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
PERLMUTTER, D. (1971). Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.Google Scholar
PHINNEY, M. (1987). The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds). Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RIZZI, L. (1982). Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). A parametric approach to comparative syntax: properties of the pronominal system. In L. Haegeman (Ed). The new comparative syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ruĺz DE ZAROBE, Y. (1998). El parámetro pro-drop y la adquisición del inglés como segunda lengua. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, June: 49-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SUÑER, M. (1982). On null subjects. Linguistic Analysis, 9(1): 55-78.Google Scholar
TSIMPLI, I.-M., & ROUSSOU, A. (1990). Parameter-resetting in L2. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 149-189.Google Scholar
WHITE, L. (1985). The "pro-drop" parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35(1): 47-62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986). Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the Pro-drop parameter. In V. J. Cook (Ed). Experimental Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Długosz, Kamil
2022. Cross-linguistic influence in the initial stages of L3 German: An empirical study on verb placement and subject pronouns. In Wissenschaften und ihr Dialog, ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Long, Avizia Y.
2021. Korean Learners’ Acquisition and Use of Variable First-Person Subject Forms in Spanish. Languages 6:4 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Satterfield, Teresa
2021. Chapter 9. Dual competence in dual language learners. In East and West of The Pentacrest [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 33], ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Mitkovska, Liljana & Eleni Bužarovska
2018. Subject pronoun (non)realization in the English learner language of Macedonian speakers. Second Language Research 34:4 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Lubbers Quesada, Margaret
2013. Subject Pronouns in Second Language Spanish. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2013. Generative Approaches to Spanish Second Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Aarnes Gudmestad
2010. AN EXPLORATION OF THE RANGE AND FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF FORMS IN POTENTIALLY VARIABLE STRUCTURES IN SECOND-LANGUAGE SPANISH. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristobal
2006. Focus and split-intransitivity: the acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research 22:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal
2018. The Development of Anaphora Resolution at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Pronominal Subjects in Greek Learners of Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:2 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.