Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 137/138 (2002) ► pp.271299
References (38)
Referencias Bibliográficas
En Pütz, Martin & Marjolijn H. Verspoor (eds.) (2000), Explorations in linguistic relativity, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2000: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ENFIELD, Nick J., "On linguocentrism", pp. 125–158. DOI logo
HOUSE, Juliane, "Linguistic relativity and translation", pp. 69–88. DOI logo
KRONENFELD, David B., "Language and thought: collective tools for individual use", pp. 197–224. DOI logo
PÜTZ, Martin & Marjolijn H. VERSPOOR, "Introduction", pp. ix–xvi.
TRABANT, Jürgen, "How relativistic are Humboldt's 'Weltansichten'?", pp. 25–44. DOI logo
En Niemeier, Susanne & René Dirven (eds.) (2000), Evidence for linguistic relativity, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2000: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LUCY, John, "Introductory comments", pp. ix–xxi.
MARATSOS, Michael, Demetra Katis & Annalisa Margheri, "Can grammar make you feel different?", pp. 53–70. DOI logo
Otros trabajos mencionados:
BUNGE, Mario (1980), The Body-Mind problem. A psychological approach, Oxford, Pergamon. Cito por la versión española de B. García Noriega, El problema mente-cerebro. Un enfoque psicobiológico, Madrid, Tecnos, 1985.Google Scholar
COSERIU, Eugenio (1977), El hombre y su lenguaje. Estudios de teoría y metodología lingüística, Madrid, Gredos, 1977.Google Scholar
DROSTE, Flip & John FOUGHT (1993), "Arbitrariness, iconicity and conceptually", en Semiotica, 94/3-4, pp. 185–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EDELMAN, Gerald (1992), Bright Air, Brilliant Fire. On the matter of the Mind, Londres, Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
FOLEY, William A. (1997), Anthropological linguistics, Oxford, Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar
GUMPERZ, John J. & Stephen C. LEVINSON (eds.) (1996), Rethinking linguistic relativity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
HAARMANN, Harald (1990), Language in its cultural embedding: explorations in the relativity of signs and sign systems, Berlín, Mouton de Gruyter, 1990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HOOSAIN, Rumjahn (1991), Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: a case study of Chinese, Hillsdale (New Yersey), Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.Google Scholar
HYMES, Dell (1966), "Two types of linguistic relativity", en William Bright (ed.), Sociolinguistics: proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference 1964, The Hague, Mouton, 1966, pp. 114–165.Google Scholar
LEE, Penny (1996), The Whorf Theory complex: a critical reconstruction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LUCY, John (1992a), Language diversity and thought. A reformulation of the linguistic-relativity hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992b), Grammatical categories and cognition. A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NOBLE, William & Iain DAVIDSON (1996), Human evolution, language and mind: a Psychological and Archeological inquiry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
SLOBIN, Dan I. (1996), "From thought and language to thinking for speaking", en Gumperz & Levinson (eds.) (1996), pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
SMITH, Marion V. (1996), "Linguistic relativity: on hypotheses and confusions", en Communication and Cognition, 29/1, 1996, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
WHORF, Benjamin L. (1940), "Science and linguistics", en Technology Review (MIT), 42/6, pp. 229–231, 247–248. Reed, en Whorf (1956), pp. 207–219.Google Scholar
(1956), Language, thought and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll (ed.), Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press, 1956.Google Scholar
WIERZBICKA, Anna (1990), "The meaning of color terms: semantics, culture and cognition", en Cognitive Linguistics, 1/1, 1990, pp. 99–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar