Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 137/138 (2002) ► pp.271299
References

Referencias Bibliográficas

En Pütz, Martin & Marjolijn H. Verspoor
(eds.) (2000), Explorations in linguistic relativity, Amsterdam, John Benjamins 2000: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ENFIELD, Nick J.
On linguocentrism", pp. 125–158. DOI logo
HOUSE, Juliane
KRONENFELD, David B.
PÜTZ, Martin & Marjolijn H. VERSPOOR
Introduction", pp. ix–xvi.
TRABANT, Jürgen
En Niemeier, Susanne & René Dirven (eds.) (2000), Evidence for linguistic relativity, Amsterdam, John Benjamins 2000: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LUCY, John
Introductory comments", pp. ix–xxi.
MARATSOS, Michael, Demetra Katis & Annalisa Margheri

Otros trabajos mencionados:

BUNGE, Mario
(1980), The Body-Mind problem. A psychological approach, Oxford, Pergamon. Cito por la versión española de B. García Noriega, El problema mente-cerebro. Un enfoque psicobiológico, Madrid, Tecnos 1985.Google Scholar
COSERIU, Eugenio
(1977), El hombre y su lenguaje. Estudios de teoría y metodología lingüística, Madrid, Gredos 1977.Google Scholar
DROSTE, Flip & John FOUGHT
(1993), "Arbitrariness, iconicity and conceptually", en Semiotica, 94/3-4, pp. 185–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
EDELMAN, Gerald
(1992), Bright Air, Brilliant Fire. On the matter of the Mind, Londres, Penguin Books 1992.Google Scholar
FOLEY, William A.
(1997), Anthropological linguistics, Oxford, Blackwell 1997.Google Scholar
GUMPERZ, John J. & Stephen C. LEVINSON
(eds.) (1996), Rethinking linguistic relativity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
HAARMANN, Harald
(1990), Language in its cultural embedding: explorations in the relativity of signs and sign systems, Berlín, Mouton de Gruyter 1990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HOOSAIN, Rumjahn
(1991), Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: a case study of Chinese, Hillsdale (New Yersey), Lawrence Erlbaum 1991.Google Scholar
HYMES, Dell
(1966), "Two types of linguistic relativity", en William Bright (ed.), Sociolinguistics: proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference 1964, The Hague, Mouton 1966, pp. 114–165.Google Scholar
LEE, Penny
(1996), The Whorf Theory complex: a critical reconstruction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins 1996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LUCY, John
(1992a), Language diversity and thought. A reformulation of the linguistic-relativity hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1992 doi:  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992b), Grammatical categories and cognition. A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NOBLE, William & Iain DAVIDSON
(1996), Human evolution, language and mind: a Psychological and Archeological inquiry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
SLOBIN, Dan I.
(1996), "From thought and language to thinking for speaking", en Gumperz & Levinson (eds.) (1996), pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
SMITH, Marion V.
(1996), "Linguistic relativity: on hypotheses and confusions", en Communication and Cognition, 29/1 1996, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
WHORF, Benjamin L.
(1940), "Science and linguistics", en Technology Review (MIT), 42/6, pp. 229–231, 247–248. Reed, en Whorf (1956), pp. 207–219.Google Scholar
(1956), Language, thought and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll (ed.), Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press 1956.Google Scholar
WIERZBICKA, Anna
(1990), "The meaning of color terms: semantics, culture and cognition", en Cognitive Linguistics, 1/1 1990, pp. 99–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar