Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 151 (2006) ► pp.83–98

Agreement in the English Interlanguage of Basque/Spanish Bilinguals

a Minimalist Farewell to pro

| Universidad del País Vasco
| Universidad Pública de Navarra
| University of Ottawa
This study investigates the status of subject pronouns in the English interlanguage of Basque-Spanish bilinguals from a minimalist perspective. The oral production of 20 participants was analyzed at two different points in their acquisition of English (Time 1:396 hours of exposure; Time 2:564 hours of exposure). The pronoun he, systematicaily adjoined to the verb at Time 1 in sentences that already feature a DP subject, is interpreted as a place holder for the agreement morphemes in the subjects' L 1s. At Time 2 the entire pronominal system is acquired and English pronouns become independent. The reanalysis of pronouns, from agreement morphemes to free elements, is argued to have a direct impact on the distribution of inflection in the participants' English interlanguage.
Published online: 1 January 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.151.0.2015223
References (33)
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-moment and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161: 491-539.Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. and Slobin, D.I.. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P. and Chilosi, A.M. 1993/1994. Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition 31: 327-369.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. and Valencia, J. 1994. Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics 151(2): 195-207.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1990/1991. Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition 11: 361-391.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. and Penke, M. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone corpus. In J. Meisel (ed.) The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Eubank, L. 1993/1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Second Language Research 121: 73-106.Google Scholar
Felix, S. W. and Hahn, A. 1985. Natural processes in classroom second language learning. Applied Linguistics 6(3): 223-238.Google Scholar
Fleta, M.T. 1999. La adquisición del ingles no nativo por niños: El desarrollo de la clausula. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad Complutense de Madrid and I n s t i t u t o Universitario Ortega y Gasset.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. and Gundel, G. 1987. Topic prominence in interlanguage. Language Learning 371: 1-18.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P. and García Lecumberri, M.L. (eds.) 2003. Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P., Lázaro Ibarrola, A. and Liceras, J.M. 2001. La forma is y los pronobres débiles como morfemas de concordancia en la interlengua inglesa de niños bilingües castellano/euskera. In L. González Romero, M. Martinez Vázquez, B. Rodriguez Arrizabalaga y P. Ron Vaz (eds.). Recent Approaches to English Grammar (pp. 77-89). Huelva: Universidad de Huelva.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., Lázaro Ibarrola, A. and Liceras, J.M. 2003. Comodines is y he en el ingles/ euskera-castellano. In M.R. Pérez and I. Doval (eds.) Adquisición y enseñanza delenguas, bilingüismo y traductión (pp. 117-123). Vigo: Universidade de Vigo.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M.P., Lázaro Ibarrola, A. and Liceras, J.M. 2005. Placeholders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language Learning 551 (3): 445-489.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. and Guéron, J. 1999. English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hilles, S. 1991 Access to Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.) Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language (pp. 305-338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
lonin, T. and Wexler, K. 2002. Why is 'is' easier that '-s'? Acquisition of tense /agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research 181(2): 95-136.Google Scholar
Kato, M.A. 1999. Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus 111:1-27.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U. 1991. Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.) Point Counterpoint; Universal Grammar in the Second Language (pp. 389-410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1993/1994. The boy for the cookie: Some evidence for the non-violation of the Case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 31:51-97.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. and Schwartz, B.D. 1997. Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics 331: 327-353.Google Scholar
Lázaro Ibarrola, A. 2002. La adquisición de la morfosintaxis del ingles por niños bilingües: Una perspectiva minimalista. Ph.D. dissertation. Vitoria: Universidad del Pals Vasco.Google Scholar
Liceras, J. M. and Diaz, L. 1999. Topic-drop versus pro-drop: null subjects and pronominal subjects in the Spanish L2 of Chinese, English, French, German and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research 151(1): 1-40.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1991. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. 2001. La sobre-explicitación de la referenda personal en las narrativas en segunda lengua. In A. I. Moreno and V. Cowell (eds.). Perspectivas recientes sobre el discurso. Leon: Universidad de León. CD-ROM document.Google Scholar
2005. The development of the personal pronoun system in learners of English. Paper presented at the European Second Language Association (EUROSLA) Conference 15. Dubrovnik (Croacia), 14-17 September.Google Scholar
Radford, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar. A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. 1992. From the initial state to V2 acquisition principles in action. In J. M. Meisel (ed.) The Acquisition of Verb Placement (pp. 333-370). Dordrecht:Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ruiz Zarobe, Y. 2001. The age factor in trilingual language production: The case of subject pronouns in the acquisition of English. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Third Language Acquisition and Trilingualism. Fryske Akademy, 13-15 September.Google Scholar
2003. Edad y tipologia pronominal en la adquisición del ingles como tercera lengua. In I. M. Palacios Martinez, M. J. López Couso, P. Fra López and E. Seoane Posse (eds.) Fifty Years of English Studies in Spain (1952-2002). A Commemorative Volume (pp. 417-428). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar