Review published In:
Learning and Teaching L2 Writing
Guest-edited by Daphne van Weijen, Elke Van Steendam and Gert Rijlaarsdam
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156] 2008
► pp. 339348
Beadle, R. & C. Richmond
(eds.)(2006) Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century. Part 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A.
(1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:2.145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, D.
(2006) The grand debate: where next for politeness research? Culture, Language and Representation 31:9–16Google Scholar
Brinton, L.J.
(2001) Historical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Ehernberger Hamilton (eds.) The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 138–160.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, N.
(ed.)(2004) [1971, 1976] Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century. Parts 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Rycker, T.
(1987) Turns at writing: The organization of correspondence. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 613–647.Google Scholar
Dossena, M.
(2006) Forms of self-representation in nineteenth-century business letters. In M. Dossena & I. Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English. (Studies in Language and Communication 40). Bern: Peter Lang, 173–190.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–49.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2002) Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse. London: Longman, 115–30.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H.
(2005) News discourse: Mass media communication from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century. In J. Skaffari, M. Peikolai, R. Carroll, R. Hiltunen & B. Warvik (eds.), Opening windows on texts and discourses of the past. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1998) Other floors, other voices: A textology of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Teubert, W.
(ed.)(2007) Text corpora and multilingual lexicography. (Benjamins Current Topics 8). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
(2004) Historical pragmatics. In L.R. Horn & G.L. Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 538–561.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
(1999) Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J., J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & Chr. Bulcaen
(eds.)(2003) Handbook of Pragmatics: 2001 & 2002 Installments. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Werkhofer, K.T.
(1992) Traditional and modern views: The social constitution and the power of politeness. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language. Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–199.Google Scholar
Wood, L.A. & R.O. Kroger
(2000) Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Xie, Ch.
(2003) Review of Handbook of Pragmatics: 2001 & 2002 lnstallments by J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & Chr. Bulcaen (eds.)(2003) LINGUIST List 14.3179. Available from [URL].