Adamson, G.W., & Boreham, J. (1974). The use of an association measure based on character structure to identify semantically related pairs of words and document titles. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(7), 253–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Al-Khalifa, H.S., & Al-Ajlan, A. (2010). Automatic readability measurements of the arabic text: An exploratory study. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 35(2C).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aluisio, S., Specia, L., Gasperin, C., & Scarton, C. (2010). Readability assessment for text simplification.
Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Fifth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
(pp. 1–9). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Anagnostou, N.K., & Weir, G.R.S. (2006). From corpus-based collocation frequencies to readability measure.
ICT in the Analysis, Teaching and Learning of Languages
(pp. 33–46).
Beinborn, L., Zesch, T., & Gurevych, I. (2012). Towards fine-grained readability measures for self-directed language learning.
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Computer-Assisted Language Learning
(Vol. 801, pp. 11–19). Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping Universitet.
Beinborn, L., Zesch, T., & Gurevych, I. (2013). Cognate production using character-based machine translation.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing
(pp. 883–891). Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
Benjamin, R.G. (2011). Reconstructing readability: Recent developments and recommendations in the analysis of text difficulty. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 63–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brew, C., & McKelvie, D. (1996). Word-pair extraction for lexicography.
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on new Methods in Language Processing
(pp. 45–55).
Brown, J.D. (1998). An EFL readability index. JALT Journal, 20(2), 7–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carrell, P.L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(1), 21–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cenoz, J. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coleman, M., & Liau, T. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 283–284. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins-Thompson, K., & Callan, J. (2005). Predicting reading difficulty with statistical language models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(13), 1448–1462. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, V.J., Long, J., & McDonough, S. (1979). First and second language learning. In G.E. Perren (Ed.), The mother tongue and other languages in education (pp. 7–22). London: CILTR![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D. (2011). Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (Vol. 301). John Wiley & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curran, J. (2010). Agatha Christie’s secret notebooks: Fifty years of mysteries in the making (pp. 496). US:HarperCollins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Danielsson, P., & Mühlenbock, K. (2000). Small but efficient: The misconception of high- frequency words in Scandinavian translation.
Envisioning Machine Translation in the Information Future
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 1934 (pp. 158–168). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
De Groot, A.M.B., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50(1), 1–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeKeyser, R.M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell’Orletta, F., Montemagni, S., & Venturi, G. (2011). READ-IT: Assessing readability of Italian texts with a view to text simplification.
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies
(pp. 73–83).
DuBay, W.H. (2004). The principles of readability. Impact Information, 1–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N. (1994). Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 111.
Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, L., Elhadad, N., & Huenerfauth, M. (2009). Cognitively motivated features for readability assessment.
Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(pp. 229–237). Morristown, NJ, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ferreira de Souza, V. (2003). The role of cognates in reading comprehension. repositorio.ufsc.br. Florianópolis, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, J. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
François, T., & Fairon, C. (2012). An “AI readability” formula for French as a foreign language.
Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning
(pp. 466–477).
Gomes, L., & Pereira Lopes, J.G. (2011). Measuring spelling similarity for cognate identification. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 624–633. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7026. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, 36(2).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenfield, J. (2004). Readability formulas for EFL. JALT Journal, 26(1), 5–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gunning, R. (1969). The fog index after twenty years. Journal of Business Communication, 6(2), 3–13. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures, or, talking about words: Receptive procedures in foreign language learning with special reference to English. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, P.A.V., & Dowling, G.R. (1980). Approximate string matching. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 12(4), 381–402. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heilman, M.J., Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J., & Eskenazi, M. (2007). Combining lexical and grammatical features to improve readability measures for first and second language texts.
Proceedings of NAACL-HLT
(pp. 460–467).
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J.F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106(1), 501–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inkpen, D., Frunza, O., & Kondrak, G. (2005). Automatic identification of cognates and false friends in French and English.
Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing
(pp. 251–257).
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaushanskaya, M., & Rechtzigel, K. (2012). Concreteness effects in bilingual and monolingual word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 935–941. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne Jr, R.P., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kondrak, G. (2000). A new algorithm for the alignment of phonetic sequences.
Proceedings of the 1st NAACL
(pp. 288–295).
Kondrak, G., & Dorr, B. (2004). Identification of confusable drug names: A new approach and evaluation methodology.
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
(pp. 952–958).
Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation andpicture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 331, 149–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsson, P. (2006). Classification into readability levels implementation and evaluation. Sweden: Uppsala University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G.C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension, 22(1), 15–30.
Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lervåg, A., & Aukrust, V.G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 51(5), 612–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, D. (1998). Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words.
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on on Computational Linguistics
(Vol. 21, pp. 768–774). Association for Computational Linguistics.
List, J.-M. (2012). LexStat: Automatic detection of cognates in multilingual wordlists.
Proceedings of the EACL 2012 Joint Workshop of LINGVIS\UNCLH
(pp. 117–125).
Lotto, L., & De Groot, A.M.B. (1998). Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning, 48(1), 31–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, S., & Ramscar, M. (2001). Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context on judgements of semantic similarity.
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 611–616).
McLaughlin, G.H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meara, P. (1988). Learning words in an L1 and an L2. Polyglot, 9(3), 1–11.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Melamed, I.D. (1999). Bitext maps and alignment via pattern recognition. Computational Linguistics, 25(1), 107–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitkov, R., Pekar, V., Blagoev, D., & Mulloni, A. (2008). Methods for extracting and classifying pairs of cognates and false friends. Machine Translation, 21(1), 29–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montalvo, S., Pardo, E.G., Martinez, R., & Fresno, V. (2012). Automatic cognate identification based on a fuzzy combination of string similarity measures.
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(pp. 1–8).
Mulloni, A., & Pekar, V. (2006). Automatic detection of orthographic cues for cognate recognition.
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
(pp. 2387–2390).
Nakov, S. (2009). Automatic identification of false friends in parallel corpora: Statistical and semantic approach, Serdica Journal of Computing, 3(2), 133–158.
Nation, P. (2003). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 5(2), 1–8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paribakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy, 174–200.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008). Revisiting readability: A unified framework for predicting text quality.
Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
(pp. 186–195). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Potter, M.C., So, K.-F., Eckardt, B. Von, & Feldman, L.B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 23–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ringbom, H., & Jarvis, S. (2009). The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 106–118). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sato, S., Matsuyoshi, S., & Kondoh, Y. (2008). Automatic assessment of Japanese text readability based on a textbook corpus.
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)
. Marrakech, Morocco.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, 1–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarm, S.E., & Ostendorf, M. (2005). Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models.
Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL
(pp. 523–530).
Sepúlveda Torres, L., & Aluisio, S.M. (2011). Using machine learning methods to avoid the pitfall of cognates and false friends in Spanish-Portuguese word pairs.
Proceedings of the 8th Brazilian Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology
(pp. 67–76).
Sigurd, B., Eeg-Olofsson, M., & Van Weijer, J. (2004). Word length, sentence length and frequency - Zipf revisited. Studia Linguistica, 58(1), 37–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simard, M., Foster, G.F., & Isabelle, P. (1992). Using cognates to align sentences in bilingual corpora (pp. 67–81).
Smith, E.A., & Senter, R.J. (1967). Automated readability index. Ohio: Cincinnati University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tharp, J.B. (1939). The measurement of vocabulary difficulty. The Modern Language Journal, 24(3), 169–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tonelli, S., Manh, K.T., & Pianta, E. (2012). Making readability indices readable.
Proceedings of NAACL-HLT: Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for Target Reader Populations
(pp. 40–48).
Uitdenbogerd, S. (2005). Readability of French as a foreign language and its uses.
Proceedings of the Australian Document Computing Symposium
(pp. 19–25).
Vajjala, S., & Meurers, D. (2012). On improving the accuracy of readability classification using insights from second language acquisition.
Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA7)
(pp. 163–173).
Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2003). Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning, 53(3), 547–586. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Volodina, E., & Pijetlovic, D. (2013). Towards a gold standard for Swedish CEFR-based ICALL.
Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on NLP for Computer-Assisted Language Learning
(pp. 48–65). Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping Universitet.
Vor der Brück, T., Hartrumpf, S., & Helbig, H. (2008). A readability checker with supervised learning using deep syntactic and semantic indicators.
Proceedings of the 11th International Multiconference: Information Society
(pp. 92–97).
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S.A., & Chang, A.C.-S. (2012). Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal, 43(1), 113–126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zesch, T., & Gurevych, I. (2010). Wisdom of crowds versus wisdom of linguists – measuring the semantic relatedness of words. Natural Language Engineering, 16(1), 25–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2011). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1195–1216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zobel, J., & Dart, P. (1996). Phonetic string matching: lessons from information retrival.
Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
(pp. 166–172).
Zobl, H. (1980). The formal and developmental selectivity of L1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 30(1), 43–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)