Teacher written feedback on adult beginners’ writing in a second language
Research gaps and theoretical perspectives
Article outline
- Introduction
- Beginners
- Language proficiency
- Why is feedback on beginning L2 writing important?
- A critical review of inquiries about teacher feedback on writing in second language research
- Studies within the cognitive perspective
- Scholars’ suggestions about WCF related to lower language proficiency levels
- Studies concerning adult beginners’ writing
- Studies within the sociocultural perspective
- The relevance of teacher written feedback to some SLA theories
- The concept of ‘readiness’
- Processability Theory
- Sociocultural Theory
- Summarizing comments
- An alternative framework for analyzing teacher feedback
- Background: Bridging the gap debate
- Processability Theory
- Sociocultural Theory
- A possible alternative to relativism
- Summarizing comments
- Towards a holistic approach concerning teacher written feedback
- Teachers’ feedback practice
- Suggested directions for further research
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (112)
References
Afitska, O. (2015). Role of focus-on-form instruction, corrective feedback and uptake in second language classrooms: some insights from recent second language acquisition research. The Language Learning Journal, 431, 57–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 781, 465–483. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 91, 227–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkinston, D. (2011). Introduction. Cognitivism and second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benatti, A. (2013). Proficiency. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 520–523). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on the ‘language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348–363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 631, 204–211. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 311, 193–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 191, 207–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 231, 4–12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2015). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Elements of the sociology of corporate life (13th ed.). Farnham: Ashgate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlsen, C. (2012). Proficiency level- a fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics, 331, 1–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celce – Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 251, 459–480. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chaiklin, S. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 39–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 121, 267–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeKeyser, R. (2014). The philosophy of science and the social-cognitive dichotomy in research in language learning and teaching. In J. H. Hulstijn, R. F. Young, & L. Ortega (Eds.), Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 365–386.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenstein Ebsworth, M. (2014). Features of feedback. The conversation continues. Writing & Pedagogy, 61, 187–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (2012). Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions of corrective feedback. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (3rd ed.), (pp. 151–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Analysing learner language (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferris, D. R. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of second Language Writing, 161, 165–193. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferris, D. R. (2012). Technology & corrective feedback for L2 writers: Principles, practices, & problems. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 7–29). San Marcos, TX: CALICO Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 191, 6–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., & Rabie, B. (2011). “The job of teaching writing”: Teacher views of responding to student writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 31, 39–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. J. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 101, 161–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 811, 285–300. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. Modern Language Journal, 911, 800–819. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fristedt, P. E. (2008). Gadamer’s hermeneutic holism (Unpublished PhD dissertation), University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furnborough, C., & Truman, M. (2009). Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback. Distance Education, 301, 399–418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gadamer, H. -G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gascoigne, C. (2004). Examining the effect of feedback in beginning L2 composition. Foreign Language Annals, 371, 71–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldstein, L. M. (2008). Teacher written commentary in second language classrooms (4th ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granott, N. (2005). Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives. New Ideas in Psychology, 231, 140–151. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gregg, K. R., Long, M. H., Jordan, G., & Beretta, A. (1997). Rationality and its discontents in SLA. Applied Linguistics, 181, 539–559. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 161, 40–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 255–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 641, 216–221. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151, 422–433. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H. (2014a). Epistemological remarks on a social-cognitive gap in the study of second language learning and teaching. In J. H. Hulstijn, R. F. Young & L. Ortega (Eds.), Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 375–380.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H., Alderson, J. H., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Developmental stages in second- language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them? In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research. Eurosla Monographs Series, 11, 11–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., & Ortega, L. (2014). (Eds.), Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 361–421. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 161, 233–247. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2010). Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp. 206–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C. (2007). Processability theory applied to written and oral Swedish. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Bilingualism and theory-driven second language acquisition research (pp. 81–84). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, L. (2015). Holistic perspective on feedback for adult beginners in an online course of Swedish. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 91, 51–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, K. (1988). Mistake correction. ELT Journal, 421, 89–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 991, 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kartchava, E. (2013). The place of corrective feedback within the major SLA theories. US-China Foreign Language, 111, 136–151.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J. -U., & Liebner, M. (2011). Diagnosing L2 development. In M. Pienemann & J. -U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying processability theory. An introductory textbook (pp. 133–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J. -U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J. -U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying processability theory. An introductory textbook (pp. 149–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keßler, J. -U., & Plesser, A. (2011). Teaching grammar. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. (1996). SLA theory building: “Letting all the flowers bloom!” Language Learning, 461, 713–749. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–48). New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. (2014). The sociocultural perspective. In J. H. Hulstijn, R. F. Young, & L. Ortega (Eds.), Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 361, 368–374.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. P., & Johnson, K. E. (2007). Extending Firth and Wagner’s (1997) ontological perspective to L2 classroom praxis and teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 911, 877–892. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 151, 11–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, J. & Zhang, X. (2015). Response to Pienemann’s critique of Zhang and Lantolf (2015). Language Learning 651, 752–760. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 911, 773–787. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1999). An introduction to second language acquisition research (10th ed.). London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System 251, 465–477. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 461, 108–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 191, 1–5. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 601, 309–365. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 301, 66–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markee, N. (2009). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second-language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen, (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–118). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2014). Feedback in the supervision of postgraduate students: Insights from the work of Vygotsky and Bakhtin. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 81, 24–36.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 91, 34–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Donnell, M. E. (2014). Peer response with process-oriented, standards-based writing for beginning-level, second language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 971, 413–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2005). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 891, 317–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2012). Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing – SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211, 404–415. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 351, 227–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 23–76). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (2010). A cognitive view of language acquisition: Processability theory and beyond. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 69–88). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (2015). An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 651, 123–151. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 101, 217–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J. -U. (2014). Processability Theory. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 228–246). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211, 375–389. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raskin, J. D. (2008). The evolution of constructivism. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 211, 1–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schönström, K. (2010). Bilingualism in school-aged deaf pupils: Processability in Swedish and narrative structure in Swedish and Swedish sign language (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Stockholm University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semke, H. M. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 171, 195–202. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 411, 255–283. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. London: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stokes, D. J. (2007). Meaningful writing for beginners. Hispania, 901, 543–550. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 101, 29–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Storch, N. (2014). Investigating feedback on writing from a sociocultural theoretical perspective. Paper delivered at the
AILA World Congress
, Brisbane, Australia.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 161, 371–391. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. The Modern Language Journal, 891, 393–409. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights, and future directions. International Journal of English Studies, 101, 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vyatkina, N. (2010). The effectiveness of written corrective feedback in teaching beginning German. Foreign Language Annals, 431, 671–688. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 171, 89–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yi, U., Baker-Smemoe, W., & Evans, N. W. (2014). The rhetoric revision log: A technique for teaching rhetorical features in ESL writing. Writing & Pedagogy, 61, 337–363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, X., & Lantolf, J. (2015). Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning, 651, 152–180. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 401, 35–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Jakobson, Liivi
2019.
Lärares uppfattningar om responsfokus och responssätt för vuxna nybörjarstuderandes texter i svenska som andraspråk.
Nordand 14:1
► pp. 25 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jakobson, Liivi
2020.
Vuxna nybörjarstuderandes uppfattningar om skriftlig lärarrespons på skrivande i svenska som andraspråk.
Educare :4
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jakobson, Liivi
2022.
A Model for Analyzing Teachers’ Written Feedback on Adult Beginners’ Writing in Swedish as a Second Language.
Languages 7:2
► pp. 74 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.