Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 171:1 (2020) ► pp.90112
References
Ahmadian, M. J.
2011The Effect of ‘Massed’ Task Repetitions on Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Does it Transfer to a New Task? The Language Learning Journal 39 (3): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Task Repetition in ELT. ELT Journal 66 (3): 380–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmadian, M. J., and M. Tavakoli
2011The Effects of Simultaneous Use of Careful Online Planning and Task Repetition on Accuracy, Complexity, and Fluency in EFL Learners’ Oral Production. Language Teaching Research 151: 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., and M. P. García Mayo
2017Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research 21 (4): 480–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., and R. Oliver
2019Negative feedback on task repetition: ESL vs. EFL child settings. The Language Learning Journal 47 (3): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bret Blasco, A.
2014L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in CLIL and EFL settings: A longitudinal study. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.Google Scholar
Brooks, L., and R. Donato
2009Languaging in Collaborative Writing: Creation of and Response to Expertise. In Multiple Perspectives on Interaction. Second Language Research in honor of Susan M. Gass, edited by Mackey, A., and C. Polio, 58–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G., and W. Zeng
2015Young Foreign Language Learners’ Interactional Development in Task-based Paired Assessment in their First and Foreign Languages: A Case of English Learners in China. Education 3–13 431: 292–321.Google Scholar
Bygate, M.
1996Effects of Task Repetition: Appraising the Developing Language of Learners. In Challenge and Change in Language Teaching, edited by Willis, J. and D. Willis (136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
2001Effects of Task Repetition on the Structure and Control of Oral Language. In Task-based Learning: Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, edited by Bygate, M., Skehan, P., and M. Swain (23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., and V. Samuda
2005Integrative Planning Through the Use of Task Repetition. In Planning and Task Performance in Second Language, edited by R. Ellis (37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
2011Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 311, 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2003Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016Focus on Form: A Critical Review. Language Teaching Research 20 (3), 405–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuta, J.
2016Effects of Task Repetition on Learners’ Attention Orientation in L2 Oral Production. Language Teaching Research 20 (3), 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., and A. Azkarai
2016EFL task-based interaction. Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In Peer interaction and second language learning: pedagogical potential and research agenda, edited by M. Sato, and S. Ballinger (241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., and A. Imaz Agirre
2016Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal 441, 451–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., A. Imaz Agirre and A. Azkarai
2017Task repetition effects on CAF in EFL child task-based oral interaction. In Recent Perspectives on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching, edited by M. Ahmadian, and M. P. García Mayo (11–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. and M. L. García Lecumberri
2003Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarred, A., and N. Roelofs
2003Developing Oral Language with Barrier Games. Bentley, WA: Hands on Concepts.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., and N. Tracy-Ventura
2013The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System 411: 829–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P.
2000Second Language Learning as a Mediated Process. Language Teaching 331, 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lázaro Ibarrola, A., and R. Azpilicueta Martínez
2015Investigating Negotiation of Meaning in EFL Children with Very Low Levels of Proficiency. International Journal of English Studies 15 (1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
1996The Role of Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition, edited by Ritchie, W. C., and T. Bhatia (413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., and L. Ranta
1997Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 (1), 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., A. P. Kanganas and R. Oliver
2007Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2), 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R.
1995Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 171, 459–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 82 (3), 372–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal 86 (1), 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R., and A. Azkarai.
Patanasorn, C.
2010Effects of Procedural Content and Task Repetition on Accuracy and Fluency in an EFL Context. PhD Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Philp, J., R. Oliver, and A. Mackey
Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and F. Falodun
1993Choosing and Using Communication Tasks for Second Language Instruction and Research. In Tasks and Language Learning, edited by Crookes, G. and S. M. Gass (9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pinter, A.
2007Some Benefits of Peer-peer Interaction: 10-year-old Children Practising with a Communication Task. Language Teaching Research 111: 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouhshad, A., and N. Storch
2016A Focus on Mode. Patterns of Interaction in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Contexts. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda, edited by Sato, M., and S. Ballinger (267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sample, E., and M. Michel
2014An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal 311: 23–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N.
2012Repeating Input-based Tasks with Young Beginner Learners. RELC Journal 43 (1): 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Using Tasks with Young Beginner Learners: The Role of the Teacher. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 8 (3): 279–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
2002Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work. Language Learning 51: 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The Nature of Pair Interaction: Learners’ Interaction in an ESL Class: Its Nature and Impact on Grammatical Development. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
Swain, M.
2000The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition Through Collaborative Dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, edited by Lantolf, J. (97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006Languaging, Agency and Collaboration in Advanced Second Language Learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced Language Learning: The Contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky, edited by Byrnes, H. (95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tan, L., G. Wigglesworth and N. Storch
2010Pair Interaction and Mode of Communication: Comparing Face-to-Face and Computer Mediated Communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 331: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
1978Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., and M. Swain
2007Effects of Proficiency Differences and Patterns of Pair Interaction on Second Language Learning: Collaborative Dialogue Between Adult ESL Learners. Language Teaching Research 11 (2): 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Azkarai, Agurtzane & Marta Kopinska
2020. Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System 94  pp. 102338 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Effects of task repetition with written corrective feedback on the knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the structure. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2  pp. 464 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
2022. Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research 26:6  pp. 1106 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Po-Hung, Hung-Jen Chen, Kuo-Wei Su & Yen-Ju Chou
2024. Effects of display technique, background complexity, and target size on visual performance evaluation–A case study using the “Spot The Difference” game. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 100  pp. 103555 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Po-Hung, Hung-Jen Chen & Zhi-Qian Wang
2021. Visual Performance Assessment of Videos—A Case Study of the Game “Spot the Difference”. Applied Sciences 11:16  pp. 7628 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.