Cover not available
Part of
Computational Phraseology
Edited by Gloria Corpas Pastor and Jean-Pierre Colson
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 24] 2020
► pp. 273–296

Multi-word patterns and networks

How corpus-driven approaches have changed our description of language use

 | Institut für Deutsche Sprache
This paper discusses a theoretical and empirical approach to language fixedness that we have developed at the Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (‘Institute for German Language’) in Mannheim in the project Usuelle Worterbindungen (UWV) over the last decade. The analysis described is based on the Deutsches Referenzkorpus (‘German Reference Corpus’; DeReKo) which is located at the IDS. The corpus analysis tool used for accessing the corpus data is COSMAS II (CII) and – for statistical analysis – the IDS collocation analysis tool (Belica, 1995; CA). For detecting lexical patterns and describing their semantic and pragmatic nature we use the tool lexpan (or ‘Lexical Pattern Analyzer’) that was developed in our project. We discuss a new corpus-driven pattern dictionary that is relevant not only to the field of phraseology, but also to usage-based linguistics and lexicography as a whole.
Keywords: pattern-based lexicography, German reference corpus, phraseology, language fixedness, multiword expressions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The rocky road of qualitative interpretation
  • 3.Kinds of lexical fixedness
    • 3.1From multiword expressions to patterns
    • 3.2MWPS as autonomous units
    • 3.3Extended context patterns (ECPS)
  • 4.Corpus-linguistic methodology and interpretation
    • 4.1Corpus searches
    • 4.2Collocation profiles
    • 4.3KWIC bundles and slot-filler analysis
  • 5.A new type of corpus-driven, pattern-based MW dictionaries
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Internet sources
  • Abbreviations
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.24.14ste
References (32)
References
Belica, C. (1995). Statistische Kollokationsanalyse und Clustering. Korpuslinguistische Analysemethode. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, H. (2015). Phraseologie. Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen. 5., neu bearb. Aufl. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Burger, H., Dobrovol’skij, D., Kühn, P., & Norrick, N. R. (Eds.) (2007). Phraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 2 vols. (HSK 28, 1/2). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dobrovol’skij, D. (2011). Phraseologie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 111–130). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Feilke, H. (1996). Sprache als soziale Gestalt: Ausdruck, Prägung und die Ordnung der sprachlichen Typik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Granger, S., & Meunier, F. (Eds.) (2008). Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey (pp. 3–25). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P. (2013). Lexical Analysis. Norms and Exploitations. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, T., Faulhaber, S., & Uhrig, P. (Eds.) (2011). The Phraseological View of Language. A Tribute to John Sinclair. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., & Gill, F. (2000). Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mieder, W. (2009). International Bibliography of Paremiology and Phraseology. 2 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English. A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Renouf, A., & Sinclair, J. (1991). Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer, & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics (pp. 128–143). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2014). Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions, Collocations, Patterns (pp. 239–293). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2013). In G. Trousdale, & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 290–306). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steyer, K. (2018). Lexikalisch geprägte Muster. Modell, Methoden und Formen der Onlinepräsentation. In K. Steyer (Ed.), Sprachliche Verfestigung. Chunks, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen (pp. 227–264). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2016). Corpus-driven Description of Multi-word Patterns. In G. Corpas Pastor, J. Monti, V. Seretan, & R. Mitkov (Eds.), Workshop Proceedings Multi-Word Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technologies (MUMTTT2015) (pp. 13–18). Geneva: Editions Tradulex.Google Scholar
(2015). Patterns. Phraseology in a state of flux. In D. Dobrovol’ski (Ed.), Phraseology and Dictionaries (Special Issue). International Journal of Lexicography, 28(3), 279–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Usuelle Wortverbindungen. Zentrale Muster des Sprachgebrauchs aus korpusanalytischer Sicht. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2009). Zwischen theoretischer Modellierung und praxisnaher Anwendung. Zur Korpusgesteuerten Beschreibung usueller Wortverbindungen. In C. Mellado Blanco (Ed.), Theorie und Praxis idiomatischer Wörterbücher (pp. 119–145). Niemeyer: Tübingen.Google Scholar
(2000). Usuelle Wortverbindungen des Deutschen. Linguistisches Konzept und Lexikografische Möglichkeiten. Deutsche Sprache, 28(2), 101–125.Google Scholar
Steyer, K., & Brunner, A. (2014). Contexts, Patterns, Interrelations – New Ways of Presenting Multi-word Expressions. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2014) (pp. 82–88). Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Internet sources
(Accessed on 2 Juin 2018)
CII: COSMAS II. Korpusrecherche- und analysesystem. Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Mannheim. [URL]
Institut für Deutsche Sprache: Deutsches Referenzkorpus / Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2015-II (Release vom 28.09.2015). Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache. [URL]
lexpan: Lexical Pattern Analyzer. [URL]
PDEV: Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs. [URL]
PREPCON: Präposition-Nomen-Verbindungen im Kontext. [URL]
SkE: Sketch Engine. [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Pamies - José Manuel Pazos, Antonio
2023. Combined phrasemes 'without a hitch'. Romanica Olomucensia 35:1 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Onufrieva, Elizaveta S. & Irina V. Tresorukova
2021. On the Problem of Lexicographical Representation of Productive Phraseological Patterns (As Shown by Modern Greek Constructional Phrasemes). Vestnik NSU. Series: History, Philology 20:9 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.