Part of
Changes in Meaning and Function: Studies in historical linguistics with a focus on SpanishEdited by Jorge Fernández Jaén and Herminia Provencio Garrigós
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 25] 2020
► pp. 109–116
Edited by Jorge Fernández Jaén and Herminia Provencio Garrigós
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 25] 2020
► pp. 109–116
A note on the relative diachronic productivity of metaphor and metonymy
The assumption that the progress of culture is characterized by an increase in abstract thinking (in terms of the Vygotskyan model of cognitive development) suggests that the proportion of productive metaphor compared to metonymy increases over time. However, a large-scale investigation of metonymical and metaphoric shifts recorded in Buck’s dictionary of Indo-European synonyms does not support that suggestion.
Keywords: diachronic productivity, metaphor, metonymy, Indo-European, Vygotsky, synonymy
References
Buck, Carl Darling
1949 Dictionary
of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European
Languages. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press (edition
1988).
De Laet, Lisbeth
2017 Diachrone
evolutie van metafoor en metonymie als categorisatieprincipes voor
de socioculturele werkelijkheid. MA
thesis, University of Leuven.
Fabiszak, Magorzata, and Anna Hebda
2010 “Cognitive
historical approaches to emotions:
Pride.” In Historical
Cognitive Linguistics, ed.
by Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari, and Kathryn Allan, 333–356. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Grondelaers, Stefan
1995 “Looking
back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical
patterns.” In Language
and the Construal of the World, ed.
by John Taylor, and Robert E. MacLaury, 153–180. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010 Theories
of Lexical
Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glebkin, Vladimir V.
2014 “Cultural-historical
psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and
metaphor.” Review of Cognitive
Linguistics 12: 288–303.
2015 “The
problem of cultural-historical typology from the
four-level-cognitive-development theory
perspective.” Journal of
Cross-Cultural
Psychology 46.8: 1010–1022.
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal
2011 “The
genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in
Greek mythology.” American Journal of
Philology 132: 553–579.
Peirsman, Yves, and Geeraerts, Dirk
2006 “Metonymy
as a prototypical
category.” Cognitive
Linguistics 17: 269–316.
Tissari, Heli
2001 “Metaphors
we love by: On the cognitive metaphors of love from the 15th century
to the present.” Studia Anglica
Posnaniensia: international review of English
Studies 36: 217–242.
Vygotsky, Lev
1986 Thought
and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Translation of
Myshlenie i rech
1934.)
Zhang, Weiwei, Geeraerts, Dirk and Speelman, Dirk
2015 “Visualizing
onomasiological change: Diachronic variation in metonymic patterns
for woman in
Chinese.” Cognitive
Linguistics 26: 289–330.