Cover not available
Part of
Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends
Edited by Gloria Corpas Pastor and Bart Defrancq
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 37] 2023
► pp. 1–5

Introduction

 | Ghent University, Belgium |
 | University of Malaga, Spain |
Published online: 9 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.37.intro
References (14)
References
Akhulkova, Yulia, Hickey, Sarah, and Rosemary Hynes. 2022. “The Nimdzi Language Technology Atlas.” Nimdzi. [Online] Available at [URL].
Braun, Sabine. 2015. “Remote Interpreting”. In Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, edited by Holly Mikkelson, and Renée Jourdenais, 352–367. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheung, Andrew K. F. 2022. “COVID-19 and Interpreting.” INContext: Studies in Translation and Interculturalism 2 (2): 9–13. [Online] Available at [URL]. DOI logo
Downie, Jonathan. 2020. Interpreters vs Machines: Can Interpreters Survive in an AI-Dominated World? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fantinuoli, Claudio. 2018. “Computer-assisted interpreting: challenges and future perspectives”. In Trends in e-tools and resources for translators and interpreters, edited by Gloria Corpas Pastor and Isabel Durán Muñoz, 153–174. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gentile, Paola. 2016. The Interpreter’s Professional Status. A Sociological Investigation into the Interpreting Profession. PhD thesis. University of Trieste, Italy.
Krusell, Per, Ohanian, Lee, Ríos-Rull, José Victor, and Giovanni Violante. 2000. “Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality.” Econometrica 68 (5): 1029–1053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara. 2005. “Remote Interpreting: Issues of Multi-Sensory Integration in a Multilingual Task.” Meta 50 (2): 727–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouzourakis, Panayotis. 2006. “Remote Interpreting. A Technical Perspective.” Interpreting 8 (1): 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orlando, Marc. 2014. “A Study on the Amenability of Digital Pen Technology in a Hybrid Mode of Interpreting: Consec-simul with Notes”, The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research 6 (2): 39–54.Google Scholar
Roziner, Ilan, and Miriam Shlesinger. 2010. “Much Ado about Something Remote: Stress and Performance in Remote Interpreting.” Interpreting 12 (2): 214–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runcieman, Alan J. 2020. “Community Interpreting and the Covid-19 Crisis: Present Relevancy and Future Directions.” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, 242. [Online] Available at [URL].
Seeber, Kilian, Keller, Laura, Amos, Rhona, and Sophie Hengl. 2019. “Expectation vs. Experience. Attitudes Towards Video Remote Conference Interpreting.” Interpreting 21 (2): 270–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staelens, Nicolas, De Meulenaere, Jonas, Bleumers, Lizzy, Van Wallendael, Glenn, De Cock, Jan, Geeraert, Koen, Vercammen, Nick, Van den Broeck, Wendy, Vermeulen, Brecht, Van de Walle, Rik, and Piet Demeester. 2012. “Assessing the Importance of Audio/video Synchronization for Simultaneous Translation of Video Sequences.” Multimedia Systems 18 (6): 445–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fan, Damien Chiaming
2024. Conference interpreters’ technology readiness and perception of digital technologies. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 26:2 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Pöchhacker, Franz & Minhua Liu
2024. Interpreting technologized. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 26:2 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.