Cover not available
Part of
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 218–237

The pseudo-copulative verbs verse and sentirse

diachronic and conceptual aspects

This paper has as its purpose to present a diachronic analysis of the pseudo-copulative verbs verse and sentirse carried out from the theoretical postulates of cognitive semantics and the grammaticalization theory. It will be proved that these two pseudo-copulas in Spanish have been formed within a historical process determined by the conceptual properties of the transitive verbs ver [see] and sentir [feel], additionally highlighting the main functional differences between verse and sentirse and their specific semantic nuances.
Keywords: cognitive semantics, grammaticalization, pseudo-copulative verbs
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.10fer
References (27)
Cifuentes Honrubia, José Luis. 2012. “La atribución y sus límites: atributo, predicativo y complemento de modo.” ELUA 26: 89–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corominas, Joan and Pascual, José Antonio. 1980–1991. Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan. 2008. Lingüística cognitiva. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole. 2008. “Semántica cognitiva y categorización lingüística.” In Categorización lingüística y límites intercategoriales, Mª José Rodríguez Espiñeira and Jesús Pena Seijas (coords.), 19–56. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole and Van Gorp, Lise. 2012. “ Hacerse y volverse como nexos pseudo-copulativos: dos maneras de concebir el cambio en español.” Bulletin Hispanique 114-1: 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta and Masullo, Pascual. 1999. “La predicación: Los complementos predicativos.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (dirs), 2461–2523. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1984. Espaces mentaux (Aspects de la construction du sense dans les langues naturelles). París: Minuit.Google Scholar
. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Jaén, Jorge. 2012. Semántica cognitiva diacrónica de los verbos de percepción física del español. Universidad de Alicante: Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar
Hanegreefs, Hilde. 2008. Los verbos de percepción visual. Un análisis de corpus en un marco cognitivo. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Sorry, I’m Not Myself Today: The Metaphor System for Conceptualizing the Self.” In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), 91–123. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yuko. 2006. “Análisis comparativo de encontrarse y sentirse: entre la predicación y la atribución.” In Actas del XXXV Simposio Internacional de la SEL, León, 12–15 de diciembre de 2005, 1331–1342. Digital edition.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yuko and Pavón Lucero, María Victoria. 2007. Los verbos pseudo-copulativos del español. Madrid: Arco / Libros.Google Scholar
Porroche Ballesteros, Margarita. 1988. Ser, estar y verbos de cambio. Madrid: Arco / Libros.Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina. 2003. Copulas. Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RAE. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. “Subjectification in grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivization, S. Wright and D. Stein (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Gorp, Lise. 2008. Verbos de cambio: hacia una explicación cognitiva. Hacerse y volverse. Leuven: MA paper.Google Scholar
. 2013. “ Quedarse como verbo pseudo-copulativo de cambio: una aproximación semántico-cognitiva.” Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana 21: 173–192.Google Scholar
Vera Luján, Agustín. 2003. “Sobre el origen de las construcciones estativo-atributivas con hallar.” In Estudios ofrecidos al Prof. José Jesús de Bustos Tovar, José Luis Girón Alconchel, et al. (coords.), 259–273. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fishman, Alon
2023. Hebrew copulative perception verbs. Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 997 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.