Cover not available
Article published In:
Argumentation and Meaning: Semantic and pragmatic reflexions
Edited by Steve Oswald, Sara Greco, Johanna Miecznikowski, Chiara Pollaroli and Andrea Rocci
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:1] 2020
► pp. 42–68

At the juncture between evidentiality and argumentation

Evidential verb complementation

| Università della Svizzera Italiana

The contribution discusses the theoretical problem of the relationship between evidentiality and argumentative justification. Within a framework that combines semantic and syntactic analysis with a topics-based approach to argument schemes, it is argued that the functional domains of information source and argumentation overlap in utterances in which the former is linguistically marked, rather than entailed or implicated: explicit linguistic evidential marking is a special case of argumentation. The connection between a proposition and its source gives rise to a class of arguments from a reliable procedure that are similar to arguments from authority. When the indicated source is an inferential procedure (rather than direct experience or hearsay), the evidential argument may be combined with additional arguments that lay out part of that procedure. The particular case of inferential sources is illustrated by means of an analysis of weakly grammaticalized constructions in Italian, based on verbs of thought, communication and perception that relate a propositional complement to a subject NP or to source / place complements of the verb. The analysis shows that such further complements can either refine the categorization of the inferential source signalled by the verb, thereby contributing to the main argument from a reliable procedure, or express a premise that allows the hearer to reconstruct the internal structure of the procedure.

Keywords: information source, Argumentum Model of Topics, arguments from a reliable procedure, lexical evidential constructions, Italian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Information source
    • 2.1Evidential frames
    • 2.2Types of information source
    • 2.3Specifying the information source: Strategies of evidential marking
  • 3.Argumentation: Pragma-dialectics and AMT
  • 4.Evidential frames as arguments
    • 4.1How are evidential frames and argumentation related?
    • 4.2Signalled evidential frames as arguments from a reliable procedure and the special case of inferential sources
  • 5.The example of inferential frames marked by verb-complement constructions
    • 5.1Inferential verbs
    • 5.2Complements referring to an element of the speaker’s source
    • 5.3Complements expressing premises in the speaker’s reasoning
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00007.mie
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude?”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 19(1):209–227.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot
1989 L’argumentation dans la langue. 3ème ed. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco and Adam Kilgariff
2006 “Large Linguistically-Processed Web Corpora for Multiple Languages”. EACL ’06 Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Posters and Demonstrations: 87–90.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2014 Linguistica cognitiva. Un’introduzione. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012 Epistemic meaning: a cross-linguistic and functional study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Evidentiality: The notion and the term”. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed by Alexandra Aikhenvald, 261–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2007 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta, Juana Marín Arrese and Julia Lavid-López, J.
2017 “Adverbs as evidentials: an English-Spanish contrastive analysis of twelve adverbs in spoken and newspaper discourse”. Kalbotyra 701:32–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carretero, Marta
2016 “Noun Phrases as expressions of evidentiality: an analysis of four English abstract nouns and their Spanish equivalents”. Kalbotyra 691:29–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace and Johanna Nichols
1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chojnicka, Joanna
2016 “Latvian verbs of speaking and their relations to evidentiality”. Kalbotyra 691:59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2007 “The continuum between lexical and grammatical evidentiality: a functional analysis of Spanish parecer ”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 19(1):109–121.Google Scholar
Cuenca, María-Josep and María-Josep Marín
2012 “Discourse markers and modality in spoken Catalan: the case of (és) clar”. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15):2211–2225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick and Julie Van Bogaert
2012 “Réflexion sur les critères de définition et les problèmes d’identification des marqueurs évidentiels en français”. Langue française 1731:13–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick
1994 « Devoir épistémique, marqueur modal ou évidentiel?” Langue française 102(1):24–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1989 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
2014. «Argumentieren als sprachliche Ressource des diskursiven Lernens”. In Diskursive und textuelle Strukturen in der Hochschuldidaktik, ed. by Antonie Hornung, Gabriella Carobbio and Daniela Sorrentino, 41–54. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
2006 “Frame Semantics”. In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed by Dirk Geeraerts, 373–400. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara
2001 “Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2):167–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Ana and Manana Topadze
2007 “The coding of evidentiality: a comparative look at Georgian and Italian”. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1):7–38.Google Scholar
Greco, Paolo
2018 “Evidentiality and epistemic modality in witness testimony in the context of Italian criminal trials”. Journal of Pragmatics 1281:128–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Francis and Agnès Tutin
2010 “Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: The Case of the French Verb Voir”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 279–308 Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Francis and Françoise Wirth
2007 “Marking Evidentiality in Scientific Papers: The Case of Expectation Markers”. In Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Kjersti Fløttum, 2002–2018. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Haan, Ferdinand de
2005 “Encoding Speaker Perspective: Evidentials”. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges and David S. Rood, 379–397. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassler, Gerda
2018 Evidential and epistemic sentence adverbs in Romance languages. In: Anna-Maria De Cesare, Anna Albom, Doriana Cimmino and Marta Lupica Spagnolo, eds, Formal and functional perspectives on sentence adverbials in the Romance languages and beyond (= Special issue of Linguistik Online 92:5). Frankfurt: Faculty for Cultural Sciences, European University Viadrina, pp. 87-109.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
1999 Polysemy and metaphors in perception verbs: a cross-linguistic study. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jacquin, Jérôme
2017 « De la polyfonctionnalité de JE SAIS dans des débats publics et télévisés ». Revue française de linguistique appliquée 22(2):109–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957 Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1981 “The Notional Category of Modality”. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts, ed. by Hans Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser, 38–74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Stephen
2008 “Source Monitoring”. In Learning and Memory. A comprehensive Reference, ed. by John Byrne, 325–347. London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miecznikowski, Johanna and Elena Musi
2015 “Verbs of appearance and argument schemes: Italian sembrare as an argumentative indicator”. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 259–278. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miecznikowski, Johanna
2008 “Gli usi del condizionale nel parlato italiano e francese”. In La comunicazione parlata : atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 23–25 febbraio 2006, vol. II, ed. by Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Marianna Vallone and Renata Savy, 865–902. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
2009 “Recita il testo…’: il rinvio a fonti scritte nella stampa economico-finanziaria”. Working paper, Università della Svizzera italiana. [URL]
2015 “Inferential connectives: the example of Italian come si vede ”. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 321: 103–118.Google Scholar
2016 “ ‘An experience that apparently differs a lot from mine’. Evidentials in discourse: the case of gastronomic discussions”. In Case studies in Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sara Greco and Marcel Danesi, 270–298. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2017 “Predicati di percezione ed evidenzialità in italiano: l’esempio di impression ”. In Linguisti in contatto II. Atti del convegno, Bellinzona, 19–21 novembre 2015, ed by. Bruno Moretti, Elena Maria Pandolfi, Sabine Christopher and Matteo Casoni, 242–259. Bellinzona: Osservatorio linguistico della Svizzera italiana.Google Scholar
2018 “Evidential and argumentative functions of dynamic appearance verbs in Italian: the example of rivelare and emergere ”. In Argumentation and Language – Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations, ed. by Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman and Jérôme Jacquin, 73–105. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2018 « Présupposition et implicature: où passe la frontière?”. In: La présupposition entre théorisation et mise en discours, ed. by Amir Biglari and Marc Bonhomme, 57–82. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2000 “Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling”. Journal of Pragmatics 321:927–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Making knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic evidentiality”. Discourse Studies 15(5):627–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musi, Elena and Andrea Rocci
2017 “Evidently epistential adverbs are argumentative indicators: A corpus-based study”. Argument and Computation 8(2):175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musi, Elena and Mark Aakhus
2018 “Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining”. Argumentation 32(3):397–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musi, Elena
2015 Dalle apparenze alle inferenze: i verbi sembrare e apparire come indicatori argomentativi. PhD dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana.Google Scholar
Palmieri, Rudi and Johanna Miecznikowski
2016 “Predictions in Economic-Financial News: Author’s Stance and Argumentative Loci”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5(1): 48–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola
2005 Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “The grammatical nature of some epistemic-evidential adverbs in spoken Italian”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 21:39–63.Google Scholar
2018 Epistemic constructions at work. A corpus study on spoken Italian dialogues. Journal of Pragmatics, 1281, pp. 171-191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto, Robert
1996 “The relation of argument to inference”. In Logic and Argumentation, ed. by Johan Van Benthem, Frans van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman, 163–178. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Pollaroli, Chiara and Rocci, Andrea
2015 “The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4(2):158–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo and Sara Greco Morasso
2010 “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components”. Argumentation 24(4):489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo and Sara Greco
2019 Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocci, Andrea
2009 “Modalities as Indicators in Argumentative Reconstruction”. In Modalities as indicators in Argumentative reconstruction, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 207–228. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2012 “Modality and argumentative discourse relations: A study of the Italian necessity modal dovere”. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15):2129–2149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Modality in Argumentation. A semantic investigation of the role of modalities in the structure of arguments with an application to Italian modal expressions. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2006 Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4), pp. 409-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossari, Corinne
2012 « Valeur évidentielle et/ou modale de faut croire, on dirait et paraît ». Langue Française 1731:65–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruskan, Anna and Audrone Šolienė
2017 “Evidential and epistemic adverbials in Lithuanian: evidence from intra-linguistic and cross-linguistic analysis”. Kalbotyra 701:127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1989 Linguaggio, ragione, interazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
2007 Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
2014 “Evidentiality and illocution”. Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3):463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John and Daniel Vanderveken
1985 Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Socka, Anna
2011 «Evidentialität und Epistemizität in der Bedeutung reportativer Satzadverbien im Polnischen und Deutschen. In Modalität und Evidentialität / Modality and evidentiality, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 49–68. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario
(ed) 2007 Evidentiality between lexicon and grammar. Special issue of Italian Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2001 “The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance”. Studies in Language: International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”. 25(2):297–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Lexical vs. Grammatical Evidentiality in French and Italian”. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 46(5):917–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Extragrammatical expression of information source”. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Aikhenvald, 35–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ünal, Ercenur and Anna Papafragou
2018 “Evidentials, information sources and cognition”. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Aikhenvald, 175–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelia
1996 “Verbs of Appearance in English and Lithuanian”. In Basic Issues in Translation Studies: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference. Vol. I1, ed. by Albrecht Neubert, Gregory M. Shreve and Klaus Gommlich, 29–35. Kent, Ohio: Institute for Applied Linguistics Forum on Translation Studies.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst
2003 “A Pragma-dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion”. Argumentation 17(4):365–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic maneuvering: maintaining a delicate balance”. In Dialectic and Rhetoric: the Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, ed. by Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, Peter Houtlosser and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2007 Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
1996 Fundamentals of argumentation theory. A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1983 “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study”. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 21(1[263]):123–162.Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2008 Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German: A Corpus-Based Analysis from the Early Modern Period to the Present. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
2011 “(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German”. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1):347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 “A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality”. Studies in Language 12(1):51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar