Mobile Menu
New
Books
Forthcoming titles
New in paperback
New titles by subject
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
Book Series
Journals & Yearbooks
New serials
Latest issues
Currently in production
Catalog
Books
Active series
Other series
Collections
Open-access books
Text books & Course books
Dictionaries & Reference
By JB editor
Journals & Yearbooks
Active serials
Other
By JB editor
Software
Browse by person
Browse by subject
Advanced Search
Downloadable lists
Printed catalogs
E-book collections
Online Resources
Customer Services
Contact
Amsterdam (Main office)
Philadelphia (North American office)
Directions
Book Orders
General
US, Canada & Mexico
E-books
Examination & Desk Copies
Journal Subscriptions
General information
Access to the electronic edition
Terms of Use
Journal collections
Journal mutations
Rights & Permissions
Mailing List
E-newsletter
Book Gazette
For Authors
Proposals for Books
Proposals for Book Series
Proposals for Journals
Submissions to Journals
Editorial Manager
Ethics Statement
Kudos
Open Access Policy
Rights Policy
For Librarians
Evidence-Based Acquisition
E-book Collections
Journal Collections
Open Access information
Journal mutations
Review published In:
Argumentative Discourse in Contemporary China: A pragma-dialectical perspective
Edited by Peng Wu and Xu Cihua
[
Journal of Argumentation in Context
6:3] 2017
► pp.
386
–
392
◄
previous
next
►
Book review
Zhiwen Yang. 2013.
Normative research on specific method of legal argumentation
Reviewed by
Xu Mengxing
|
Hubei University, China
Article outline
1.
General principles of legal argumentation
2.
Fundamental applied research on specific methods of legal argumentation
3.
Monographic studies of representative methods
4.
Specific evaluating methodology
5.
Final remarks
References
Published online: 4 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17023.xu
References
Aarnio, A.
1987
The rational as reasonable. A treatise on legal justification
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Feteris, E. T.
1999
Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Eemeren, F. H.van
and
Grootendorst, R.
2003
A pragma-dialectical procedure for a critical discussion
.
Argumentation
, 171: 365–386.
Eemeren, F. H.van
and
Grootendorst, R.
1992
Argumentation,communication,and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical approach
. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kamlah, W.
and
Lorenzen, P.
1967
Logische Propadeutik. Vorschule des vernunftigen Redens
(2nd improved and enlarged edition). Mannheim: Biblioraphisches Institue.
MacCormick, N.
2005
Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. A theory of legal reasoning
. NY: Oxford University Press.