The strategic use of argumentation from example in
re-evaluating a people
The case of Al Aswany’s pro-democratization columns
With the help of the extended pragma-dialectical theory, this
paper aims to analyze how Al Aswany, an Egyptian political columnist who argued
in favor of the feasibility of democratization before the Arab Spring,
maneuvered strategically by argumentation from example in two of his columns in
supporting the standpoint that the Egyptian people had become no longer
politically inactive. The analysis is conducted in view of the institutional
preconditions of political columns and the specific rhetorical exigency a
columnist may face in this specific argumentative situation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The argumentative predicament of evaluating a political group by means of
examples
- 2.1Argumentation from example: An overview
- 2.2Potential maneuvers in evaluating a political group
- 2.3The characterization of political columns as a macro context
- 3.The image of the Egyptian people and political activism in Mubarak’s era: A
description of the rhetorical exigency
- 4.The “Egypt Awakened” case
- 5.“The Coming Civil Disobedience on April 6th.” Case
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References