Cover not available
Article published In:
Argumentative Style
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1] 2021
► pp. 97–120

On the relation between argumentative style and linguistic style

Integrating linguistic-stylistic analysis systematically into the analysis of argumentative style

| Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL)
| Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL)
Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of argumentative style.
In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the argumentative strategies involved.
Keywords: argumentative activity type, argumentative strategy, argumentative style, linguistic style, linguistic-stylistic analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Argumentative strategies and linguistic choices
  • 3.The linguistic-stylistic approach and its integration with pragma-dialectics
  • 4.An illustration: The Yuri case
    • 4.1The case
    • 4.2Identifying argumentative strategies
    • 4.3Linguistic-stylistic analysis
    • 4.4Results of the linguistic-stylistic analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa
References (16)
References
Burgers, C. & de Graaf, A. (2013). Language intensity as a sensationalistic news feature: the influence of style on sensationalism perceptions and effects. Communications 381: 167–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, J. (2009). Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. In Examining Argumentation in Context. Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. F. H. van Eemeren (pp. 191–220). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahnestock, J. & Y. Tonnard. (2011). Amplification in strategic maneuvering. In Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics, eds. E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (pp. 103–116). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Second edition. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Argumentative style: a complex notion. Argumentation 331: 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
This issue. Examining Argumentative Style: A New Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 11: 479–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2016). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (2nd rev. ed.) New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Haaften, T. (2019). Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic, 391, 301–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Haaften, T. & van Leeuwen, M. (2018). Strategic Maneuvering with Presentational Devices: A Systematic Approach. In Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Volume II. Studies in Logic 76, eds. S. Oswald & D. Maillat (pp. 873–886). London: College Publications.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, M. (2014). Systematic stylistic analysis. The use of a checklist. In From Text to Political Positions. Text analysis across disciplines, eds. B. Kaal, I. Maks & A. van Elfrinkhof (pp. 225–244). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Stijl en politiek. Een taalkundig-stilistische benadering van Nederlandse parlementaire toespraken. [Style and politics. A linguistic-stylistic approach to Dutch parliamentary speeches] Dissertation Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Stukker, N. & A. Verhagen. (2019). Stijl, taal en tekst: stilistiek op taalkundige basis. [Style, language and text: stylistics on a linguistic foundation.] Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

van Eemeren, Frans & Bart Garssen
2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25:4 ► pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Argumentative Style [Argumentation in Context, 20], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.