Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 4:2 (2015) ► pp.133157
Andone, Corina
2012 “The Reasonableness of Confrontational Strategic Maneuvering in Political Interviews.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by van Eemeren Frans H. and Garssen Bart, 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (6th edition). New York, NY: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova
2011“Argumentative Strategies for Conflict Management and Resolution in Italian and Swiss Families.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 301: 1385–1389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015“Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives during mealtime conversations: Differences and similarities in children of 3-5 and 6-9 years old.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 61:40–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arcidiacono, Francesco, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2009 “Family Conversations: The Relevance of Context in Evaluating Argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2): 79–92.Google Scholar
Aronsson, Karin
1998 “Identity-in-Interaction and Social Choreography.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1): 75–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, Karin, and Asta Cekaite
2011 “Activity Contracts and Directives in Everyday Family politics.” Discourse and Society 22 (2): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aukrust, Vibeke G., and Catherine E. Snow
1998 “Narratives and Explanations during Mealtime Conversations in Norway and the U.S.” Language in Society 27 (2): 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bigi, Sarah
2012 “Contextual Constraints on Argumentation. The Case of the Medical Encounter”. In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 289–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1997Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bova, Antonio
2015 “Adult as a Source of Expert Opinion in Child’s Argumentation during Family Mealtime Conversations.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (1): 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2013a “Investigating Children’s Why-questions. A Study Comparing Argumentative and Explanatory Function.” Discourse Studies 15 (6): 713–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b.”Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23 (3): 206–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “You must eat the Salad because it is Nutritious. Argumentative Strategies adopted by Parents and Children in Food-related Discussions at Mealtimes.” Appetite 731: 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brumark, Åsa
2006 “Argumentation at the Swedish Family Dinner Table.” In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Anthony J. Blair, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, and Charles A. Willards, 513–520. Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat.Google Scholar
2008“Eat your Hamburger! — No, I don’t Want to! Argumentation and Argumentative Development in the Context of Dinner Conversation in Twenty Swedish Families.” Argumentation 22 (2): 251–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Judy, and Penny Munn
1987 “Developmental of Justification in Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 23 (6): 791–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H
2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
2002Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2003“The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation.” Argumentation 17 (4): 387–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick
1988“Discourse Coherence, Participation Structure and Personal Display in a Family Dinner Table Conversation.” Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 4 (1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990“The Social Construction of Discourse Coherence in a Family Dinner Table Conversation.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 207–238. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Felton, Mark, and Deanna Kuhn
2001 “The Development of Argumentative Discourse Skills.” Discourse Processes 32 (2&3): 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiese, Barbara H., Kimberly P. Foley, and Mary Spagnola
2006 “Routine and Ritual Elements in Family Mealtimes: Contexts for Child Well-being and Family Identity.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1111: 67–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L.A
1961 “Snowball Sampling.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1): 148–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco Morasso, Sara
2012 “Contextual Frames and their Argumentative Implications: A Case-study in Media Argumentation.” Discourse Studies 14 (2): 197–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heckathorn, Douglas D
1997 “Respondent-driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations.” Social Problems 44 (2): 174–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Respondent-driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Estimates from Chain-referral Samples of Hidden Populations.” Social Problems 49 (1): 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Sally Hester
2010. “Conversational Actions and Category Relations: An Analysis of a Children’s Argument.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 33-48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laforest, Marty
2002 “Scenes of Family Life: Complaining in Everyday conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1595–1620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laurier, E., and Sally Wiggins
2011 “Finishing the Family Meal. The Interactional Organisation of Satiety.” Appetite 56 (1): 53–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Merav Shohet
2006 “The Cultural Structuring of Mealtime Socialization.” In Family Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization, ed. by Reed W. Larson, Angela R. Wiley, and Kathryn R. Branscomb, 35–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith, and Carolyn Taylor
1989“Detective Stories at Dinnertime: Problem-Solving through Co-narration.” Cultural Dynamics 2 (2): 238–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, Rudi
2012“The Diversifying of Contextual Constraints and Argumentative Strategies in Friendly and Hostile Takeover Bids.” In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Barbara. A., Rivka Y. Perlmann, and Catherine E. Snow
2000 “Food for thought: Dinner Table as a Context for Observing Parent-Child Discourse.” In Methods for Studying Language Production, ed. by Lise Menn and Nan B. Ratner, 205–224. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Patterson, Gerald R., and Marion S. Forgatch
1995 “Predicting Future Clinical Adjustment from Treatment Outcome and Process Variables.” Psychological Assessment 7 (3): 275–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Francesco Arcidiacono
2007Famiglie all’italiana: parlare a tavola. Milan: Cortina.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Alessandra Fasulo
1997 “Learning to Argue in Family Shared Discourse: The Reconstruction of Past Events.” In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, Roger Saljo, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Barbara Burge, 406–442. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999“Planning a Typical Italian Meal: A Family Reflection on Culture.” Culture Psychology 5 (3): 313–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, and Sabine Pirchio
2000.“A Developmental View on Children’s Arguing: The Need of the other.” Human Development 43 (6): 361–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo
2009 “Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived within Contemporary Argumentation Theory.” In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 157–178. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco Morasso
2010. “Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components.” Argumentation 24 (4): 489-512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundquist, Suellen
1992 “Indirectness: A Gender Study of Flouting Grice’s Maxims.” Journal of Pragmatics 18 (5): 431–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slomkowski, Cheryl L., and Judy Dunn
1992 “Arguments and Relationships within the Family: Differences in Young Children’s Disputes with Mother and Sibling.” Developmental Psychology 28 (5): 919–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., and Elizabeth R. Albro
2001 “The Origins and Nature of Arguments: Studies in Conflict Understanding, Emotion and Negotiation.” Discourse Processes 32 (2–3): 113–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Nancy L., and Christopher A. Miller
1993 “The Development of Memory and Reasoning Skill in Argumentative Contexts: Evaluating, Explaining, and Generating Evidence.” In Advances in Instructional Psychology, ed. by Robert Glaser, 285–335. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura
(2003) “Account Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday Interaction.” Discourse Studies 5 (1): 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) “Accountability in Family Discourse: Socialization into Norms and Standards and Negotiation of Responsibility in Italian Dinner Conversations.” Childhood 16 (4): 441–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas N
1997Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally
2002 “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The Social Life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as Assessment in Family Mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology 52 (3): 489–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Bova, Antonio
2019. A Qualitative Methodology for Studying Parent–Child Argumentation. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2019. Prevailing Arguments and Types of Conclusions of Parent–Child Argumentation. In The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2019. Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes. Language and Dialogue 9:3  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2021. Dialogical construction of parental feeding strategies during family mealtimes. Journal of Health Psychology 26:10  pp. 1684 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio
2021. Co-construction of argumentative discussions between parents and children during mealtime conversations. A pragma-dialectical analysis. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 29  pp. 100519 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2016. The argument from expert opinion as other-oriented reference in disciplinary discussions. Studies in Communication Sciences 16:2  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio & Francesco Arcidiacono
2020. Analyser les échanges discursifs entre parents et enfants par la reconstruction argumentative. Revue internationale de l'éducation familiale n° 46:2  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Bova, Antonio, Francesco Arcidiacono & Fabrice Clément
2017. Chapter 11. The transmission of what is taken for granted in children’s socialization. In Argumentation across Communities of Practice [Argumentation in Context, 10],  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Bubikova-Moan, Jarmila & Margareth Sandvik
2022. Argumentation in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review. Human Development 66:6  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.