Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 6:2 (2017) ► pp.167192
Aakhus, M.
(2006) The act and activity of proposing in deliberation. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging argument. Selected papers from the 2005 National Communication Association/American Forensic Association Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 402–408). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
Aakhus, M., & Lewinski, M.
(2011) Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. L., & D’Agostine, J. M.
(1994) The Case of the Midnight Judges and Multiple Audience Discourse: Chief Justice Marshall and Marbury V. Madison. The Southern Communication Journal 59(2), 89–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bitzer, L.
(1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
(1980) Functional communication: A situational perspective. In E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition: Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). University Park & London: Pennsylvanian State University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, M.
(1999) Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Standford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brennan, N. M., C. Daly, & C. Harrington
(2010) Rhetoric, Argument and Impression Management in Hostile Takeover Defence Documents. British Accounting Review, 42 (4), 253–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broome, J.
(2002) Practical reasoning. In J. L. Bermùdez, & A. Millar (Eds), Reason and nature: essays in the theory of rationality (pp. 85–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.
(2004): A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. – Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2002) Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P.
(2002) Strategic Maneuvering. Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds), Dialectic and rhetoric: the warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluver. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N.
(2012) Values as premises in practical arguments: Conceptions of justice in the public debate over bankers’ bonuses. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds), Exploring Argumentative Contexts (pp. 23–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
(2002) A pragma-dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, 16(3), 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E.
(1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. B.
(1991) Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure. Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garssen, B.
(2001) Argument schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Gobber, G., & Palmieri, R.
(2014) Argumentation in institutional founding documents. The case of Switzerland’s Foedus Pactum. In G. Gobber, & A. Rocci (Eds), Language, reason and education. Studies in honor of Eddo Rigotti by his students and colleagues (pp. 171–191). Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, J.
(2002) Designing issues. In F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: the warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 81–96). Springer Science and Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1964) The neglected situation. American anthropologist, 66(6_PART2), 133–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco Morasso, S.
Green, S. E.
(2004) A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haan-Kamminga, A.
(2006): Supervision on Takeover Bids: A Comparison of Regulatory Arrangements. – Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hartelius, E. J., & Browning, L. D.
(2009) The application of rhetorical theory in managerial research: a literature review. In S. R. Clegg (ed.), SAGE Directions in Organization Studies (pp. 379–404). SAGE.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, D.
(2001) Pollock on practical reasoning. Informal Logic, 22(3), 247–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihnen, C.
(2010) The analysis of pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates: Second reading of the terrorism bill in the British House of Commons. Controversia, 7(1).Google Scholar
Jacobs, S.
(2000) Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation, 14(3), 261–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, M.
(2014) Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 81, 1–20.Google Scholar
Lewinksi, M., & Aakhus, M.
(2014) Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 281, 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzali-Lurati, S.
(2011) Generi e portatori di interesse: due nozioni-chiave per la scrittura nelle organizzazioni. Cultura e comunicazione, 041, 12–18.Google Scholar
Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C.
(2013) Stakeholders in promotional genres. A rhetorical perspective on marketing communication. In G. Kišiček & I.Ž. Žagar. (Eds.), What do we know about the world? Rhetorical and argumentative perspectives (pp. 365–389). Ljubljana: Digital Library of Slovenia & Windsor Studies in Argumentation.Google Scholar
McCawley, J.
(1999) Participant roles, frames, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 221, 595–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, D., & Lewinski, M.
(2016) Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 9–12 June 2015 (Volume I1). College: London.Google Scholar
Myers, F.
(1999) Political Argumentation and the Composite Audience: A Case Study. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 851, 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, R.
(2008) Reconstructing argumentative interactions in M&A offers. Studies in Communication Sciences, 8(2), 279–302.Google Scholar
(2014) Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, R., & Mazzali-Lurati, S.
(2016) Multiple audiences as text stakeholders. A conceptual framework for analysing complex rhetorical situations. Argumentation 30(4), 467–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmieri, R., Rocci, A., & Kudrautsava, N.
(2015) Argumentation in Earnings Conference Calls. Corporate standpoints and analysts’ challenges. Studies in communication sciences, 15(1), 120–132 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrecths-Tyteca, L.
(1958) La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pinto, R. C.
(2001) Argument, inference and dialectic. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J. L.
(1995) Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Mit Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poppel, L. van
(2012) The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(1), 97–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S.
(2002) Redefining the corporation: Stakeholders management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rigotti, E.
(2014) The nature and functions of loci in Agricola’s De inuentione Dialectica . Argumentation 28(1), 19–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Whether and how classical topics can be revived in the contemporary theory of argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. J. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 157–178). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Locus a causa finali. In G. Gobber, S. Cantarini, S. Cigada, M. C. Gatti, & S. Gilardoni (Eds), Word meaning in argumentative dialogue. Special issue of L’analisi linguistica e letteraria XVI(2): 559–576.Google Scholar
(2006) Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation 20(4), 519–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) La linguistica tra le scienze della comunicazione. In A. Giacalone-Ramat, E. Rigotti, & A. Rocci (Eds), Linguistica e nuove professioni (pp. 21–35). Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
(2010) Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
(2006) Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6/21, 155–180.Google Scholar
Rocci, A.
(2009) Manoeuvring with voices. In: F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Examining Argumentation in Context (pp.257–283). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Modality and its conversational backgrounds in the reconstruction of argumentation. Argumentation 221, 165–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4), 409–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D.
(ed.) (1959) Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1958) Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(2001) Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vega, L., & Olmos, P.
(2007) Deliberation: A paradigm in the arena of public argument. In H. V. Hansen et al. (Eds), Dissensus and the search for common ground (pp. 1–11), CD-ROM. Windsor, ON: OSSA.Google Scholar
Von Wright, G. H.
(1963) Practical inference. The Philosophical Review, 159–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, D. N.
(1990) Practical reasoning: goal-driven, knowledge-based, action-guiding argumentation. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Browning, Larry D. & E. Johanna Hartelius
2018. Rhetorical Analysis in Management and Organizational Research, 2007–2017. In The Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication,  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Palmieri, Rudi & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati
2021. Strategic Communication with Multiple Audiences: Polyphony, Text Stakeholders, and Argumentation. International Journal of Strategic Communication 15:3  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2021. Characterizing Argumentative Style: The Case of KLM and the Destructed Squirrels. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.