Cover not available
Article published In:
Vagueness and Elasticity of 'Sort of' in TV Discussion Discourse in the Asian Pacific
Edited by Vahid Parvaresh and Grace Zhang
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1] 2019
► pp. 33–61

On the functions of sort of in New Zealand TV programs

 | Curtin University, Australia
Sort of is a pragmatic particle with a range of functions in different contexts. There are different factors which can contribute to its varied functions. Focusing on the media discourse, this study investigates the frequency and pragmatic functions of sort of in New Zealand English. Based on the analysis of the data from a current affairs TV program, the study shows that sort of is a pragmatic particle under-used in this discourse type. The analysis of its pragmatic functions demonstrates that right amount of information and mitigation fulfill a substantial proportion of sort of functions. The other two functions, avoidance and discourse management, are less frequent, but still perform important roles in effective media communication.
Keywords: sort of , kind of , pragmatic particles, discourse particles, vague language, discourse markers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Pragmatic particles: Previous research
  • 2. Sort of: Background studies
    • 2.1 Sort of history
    • 2.2 Sort of prosodic features
    • 2.3 Sort of semantics
    • 2.4 Sort of functions
      • 2.4.1Overview of taxonomies of sort of functions
      • 2.4.2 Sort of pragmatic functions
    • 2.5 Sort of collocations
    • 2.6 Sort of in different contexts
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall frequency
    • 4.2Pragmatic functions
      • 4.2.1Right amount of information
      • 4.2.2Mitigation
      • 4.2.3Avoidance
      • 4.2.4Discourse management
    • 4.3Collocations
  • 5.General discussions
  • 6.Conclusions and implications
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00020.sab
References (58)
References
Aijmer, K. (1984). ‘Sort of’ and ‘kind of’ in English conversation. Studia Linguistica, 38(2), 118–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G. (1998). The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective. In A. H. Jucker & Y. Yiz (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp. 147–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and senibilia. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972). Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berling: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, A., & Estellé, M. (2010). On the relationship between attenuation, discourse particles and position. In G. Kaltenbӧck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 289–304). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1977). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenamena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 311, 881–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & Simpson, P. (1989). Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics. London: Unwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1987). Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological society, 851, 110–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1975). Advanced conversational English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. (2007). Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, K., Brems, L., & De Smedt, L. (2008). Type noun uses in the English NP: A case of right to left layering. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (2), 139–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, L., Brems, L., & Davidse, K. (2007). NP-internal functions and extended uses of the ‘type’ nouns kind, sort, and type: Towards a comprehensive, corpus-based description. In R. Facchinetti, (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics 25 years on (pp. 225–255). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dines, E. R. (1980). Mothers’ attitudes to children’s speech. Talanya: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Australia, 51, 23–35.Google Scholar
Fetzer, A. (2009). Sort of and kind of in political discourse: Hedge, head of NP or contextualization cue? In A. Jucker, M. Hundt & D. Schreier (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp. 125–147). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logo
(2010). Hedges in context: Form and function of ‘sort of’ and ‘kind of’. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.) New approaches to hedging (pp. 35–48). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (1982). The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal, 31, 40–65.Google Scholar
(1986). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28(4), 485–508.Google Scholar
(1988). Sort of in New Zealand women’s and men’s speech. Studia Linguistica, 42(2), 85–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 201, 91–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hübler, A. (1983). Understatements and hedges in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. (1984). The kind of/sort of construction. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 101, 157–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, A. (2007). About twelve thousand or so: Vaguenss in North America and UK offices. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 40–61). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedge: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the 8th regional meeting of the Chicago Society (pp. 183–228). Chicago.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1996). A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lin, C. (2010). ‘… that’s actually sort of you know trying to get consultants in …’: Functions and multifunctionality of modifiers in academic lectures. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 1173–1183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miskovic-Lukovic, M. (2009). Is there a chance that I might kinda sort of take you out to dinner?: The role of the pragmatic particles kind of and sort of in utterance interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 602–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T. (1996). Pragmatic force modifiers: A study in interlanguage pragmatics. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.Google Scholar
Ostman, J. O. (1981). You know: A discourse functional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, V., & Tayebi, T. (2014). Vaguely speaking in Persian. Discourse Processes, 51 (7), 565–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician – physician discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the Professions (pp. 83–97). New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ruzaitė, J. (2007). Vague language in educational settings: Quantifiers and approximators in British and American English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sabet, P., & Zhang, G. (2015). Communicating through vague language: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, R., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repairs in conversaion. Language, 531, 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L. (1985). Common discourse particles in English conversation. London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Stubbe, M., & Holmes, J. (1995). You know, eh and other ‘exasperating expressions’: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication, 15 (1), 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tabor, W. (1993). The gradual development of degree modifier sort of and kind of: A corpus proximity model. Papers from the 29th regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 451–465). Chicago.Google Scholar
Trappes-Lomax, H. (2007). Vague language as a means of self-protective avoidance: Tension management in conference talks. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 117–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1966). On the semantic structure of language. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language (pp. 142–216). Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. (2011). Elasticity of vague language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8 (4), 571–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Y. (1988). Hebrew kaze as discourse marker and lexical hedge: Conceptual and procedural properties. In A. H. Jucker & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp. 203–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar