Cover not available
Review published In:
Vagueness and Elasticity of 'Sort of' in TV Discussion Discourse in the Asian Pacific
Edited by Vahid Parvaresh and Grace Zhang
[Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1] 2019
► pp. 133–139
Book review

Dániel Z. Kádár. (2017). Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction

Reviewed by
| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China | Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Contents
  • Evaluation
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00024.gon
References
Bousfield, D.
(2008) Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, G.
(2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Gu, Y.
(1990) Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M.
(2015) Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, S.
(1989) Formal forms and ‘discernment’: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2/3), 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, D. Z.
(2013) Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M.
(2013) Understanding Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J.
(2008) Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Bousfield, D., Locher, M. A. (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar