Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp.427–451

The empirical reality of bridging contexts

Strong polarity contexts as the transition between NPIs and n-words

| Normandie Université | CRISCO (EA4255), Université Caen Normandie
| Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Sociales de Tunis

The purpose of this paper is to provide quantitative substantiation for the role of bridging context in grammatical change. Bridging contexts are assumed to be environments compatible with the new function that an item is acquiring. The evolving item would therefore be predicted to occur in bridging contexts at significant rates just before the change. To test this prediction, the well-known evolution of Negative Polarity Items into an n-word is analysed, using the well-documented case of the aucun in the history of French. Charting its course in a monogeneric corpus of narrative legal material, we find that the item occurs in strong negative polarity environments at rates of over 50% before it is found in a majority of n-word uses. This supports the view that bridging contexts are instrumental to change, and that they involve quantitative conditions.

Keywords: language change, bridging contexts, negation, n-words, NPIs, French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Bridging context as a correlation of change
  • 3.Method and data
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.00010.lar
References
Balon, Lauren & Pierre Larrivée
2016 L’Ancien français n’est déjà plus une langue à sujet nul. Nouveau témoignage des textes légaux. Journal of French Language Studies 26:2.221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battye, Adrian & Ian Roberts
eds. 1995 Introduction. Clause Structure and Language Change. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013 Does Innovation Need Reanalysis? Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change ed. by Hendrik De Smet, Evie Coussé & Ferdinand Von Mengden, 23–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déprez, Viviane
2000 Parallel (A)symmetries and the Internal Structure of n-words. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 181.253–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002 A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drenhaus, Heiner, Joanna Błaszczak & Juliane Schütte
2007 Some Psycholinguistic Comments on NPI Licensing. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 ed. by Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 180–193. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas
2003 Context, Culture and Structuration in the Languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 321.13–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
2000 In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language 76:3.546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1919 Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998 Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Negative… Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 181.457–523. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 N-words and Negative Concord. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol. 31, ed. by Martin Everaert, Henk Van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 The Dynamics of Change in Dutch enig: From Nonveridicality to Strong Negative Polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28:4.861–875. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara
2016 Indefinites 
between Latin and Romance. Habilitation dissertation, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2011 On the Evolution of Temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences 341.76–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The History of Negation in French. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean vol. 1: Case Studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 5–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–102. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
1994 On the Grammaticalization of Negative Polarity Items. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolbey & Christopher Johnson, 273–82. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2009 Jespersen Recycled. Cyclical Change, ed. by Elly Van Gelderen, 15–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dutch enig: From Nonveridicality to Downward Entailment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28:4.837–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Discourse Scalarity: The Case of Dutch helemaal . Journal of Pragmatics 431.2810–2825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallel, Amel & Richard Ingham
2014 Evidence from a Correspondence Corpus for Diachronic Change in French Indefinites 1450–1715. The Diachrony of Negation ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti, 213–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie & Maria Teresa Espinal
2014 Diachronic Changes in Negative Expressions: The Case of French. Lingua 1451.194–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2004 L’association négative : depuis la syntaxe jusqu’à l'interprétation. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
2014a Pathways of Evolution of n-words: Functions, Features, and Bridging Contexts. Paper presented at the international workshop Negation: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 18–19 December 2014.
2014b L’unidirectionalité irréversible du changement linguistique comme conséquence de l’acquisition? Le cas d’expressions négatives déliquescentes en français ancien. CMLF 2014, 297–312.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre & Richard Ingham
2012 Variation, Change and the Status of Negatives in Peripheral Varieties of Old French: The Case of néant . Studies in Honour of Professor R. Anthony Lodge ed. by Dominique Lagorgette & Tim Pooley, 99–112. Chambéry: Presses universitaires de Savoie.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999 The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. Anthony
1993 French, from Dialect to Standard. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2017 Quelle place accorder à l’opposition Récit / « Oral représenté » dans la description de l’évolution du français? La mise à l’écrit et ses conséquences. Actes du troisième colloque « Repenser l’histoire du français », Université de Neuchâtel, 5–6 juin 2014 ed. by Andres M. Kristol, 85–108. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Martineau, France & Viviane Déprez
2004  Pas rien/Pas aucun en français classique. Variation dialectale et historique. Langue francaise 1431.33–47.Google Scholar
Muller, Claude
2009 Une cartographie des indéfinis free choice du français. Syntaxe et sémantique 101.65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie & Catherine Schnedecker
2004  Aucun(e)(s)/d’aucun(e)(s)/les aucun(e)(s): évolution du français médiéval au français moderne. Scolia 81.39–73.Google Scholar
Schøsler, Lene
2002 La variation linguistique: le cas de l’expression du sujet. Interpreting the History of French: A Festschrift for Peter Rickard on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday ed. by Rodney Sampson & Wendy Ayres-Bennett, 195–212. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2012a Pragmatics and Language Change. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics ed. by Keith Allan & Kasia Jaszczolt, 549–565. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b On the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Contexts over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-changes. Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee & Magnus Hÿber, 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Alsenoy, Lauren
2014 A New Typology of Indefinite Pronouns, with a Focus on Negative Indefinites. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2010 On the Diachrony of Negation. The Expresssion of Negation ed. by Laurence R. Horn, 73–101. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vanderheyden, Anne
2012 Dire la ‘singularité’ indéterminée’. Le paradigme de quelqu’un en ancien français. Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique ed. by Bernard Combettes, Céline Guillot, Alexei Lavrentiev, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux & Sophie Prévost, 357–376. Peter Lang: Bern.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Willian Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Helmut
2002 Indefinite Pronouns. Morphology and Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Pronouns: Grammar and Representation ed. by Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese, 85–107. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, David
2012 Negative Polarity and the Quantifier Cycle: Comparative Perspectives from European Languages. The Evolution of Negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle ed. by Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham, 313–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 Endogenous and Exogenous Theories of Syntactic Change. Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax ed. by Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts, 491–514. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Junhui, Qingshun He & Guangwu Feng
2016 Rethinking the Grammaticalization of Future be going to: A Corpus-Based Approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 23:4.317–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles
2000 Internal and External Forces in Language Change. Language Variation and Change 12:3.231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Three Factors in Language Variation. Lingua 120:5.1160–1177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004 Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde H.
2011 On the Syntactically Complex Status of Negative Indefinites. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 141.111–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1998 Three Types of Polarity. Plurality and Quantification ed. by Fritz Hamn & Erhard Hinrichs, 177–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Espinal, M.Teresa & Ares Llop
2022. (Negative) Polarity Items in Catalan and Other Trans-Pyrenean Romance Languages. Languages 7:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Etxeberria, Urtzi, M.Teresa Espinal & Susagna Tubau
2024. Establishing the limits between Polarity Sensitivity, Negative Polarity and Negative Concord. Linguistic Typology 0:0 DOI logo
Gijbels, Sanderijn & Raf Van Rooy
2023. Που in Attic Drama: Evidential Marker and Common Ground Manager. Symbolae Osloenses 97:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Yamada, Aaron
2024. A diachronic analysis of Spanish alg- series and n- series items in negated clauses. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.