Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.111–135

From locative existential construction fi(ih) to a TMA/progressive marker

Grammaticalization of fi(ih) in Gulf Arabic Pidgin

 | Jazan University
The grammaticalization framework has been suggested as a predictive power for language change. This paper considers the grammatical functions of the locative construction fi(ih) in the Gulf Arabic Pidgin (a variety spoken by workers from the Indian subcontinent and south Asian countries working in the Arabian/Persian Gulf States). In Gulf Arabic, there are (1) the preposition fi ‘in; into; inside’ and (2) the locative construction fi(ih) ‘there is/are’, which only has an existential function. In Gulf Arabic Pidgin, the locative construction fi(ih), however, has several grammatical functions, including (1) a possessive marker (i.e., have-constructions), (2) an equative/predicative copula, and (3) a preverbal predicative marker. The aim in this paper is two-fold: first, to show how a grammaticalization framework can possibly account for the grammatical innovations of fi(ih) in the Gulf Arabic Pidgin; and second, to suggest that these grammatical innovations might be the results of an ongoing grammaticalization process of LOCATIVE>TMA/PROGRESSIVE. Earlier studies conducted on this pidgin serve as data sources for this project.
Keywords: grammaticalization, language change, innovation, Gulf Arabic Pidgin
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1What is a pidgin?
    • 2.2Gulf Arabic Pidgin (GAP)
  • 3.Theoretical framework
    • 3.1Grammaticalization
    • 3.2Grammaticalization in contact situations (linguistics)
  • 4. Fi(ih) in Gulf Arabic Pidgin (GAP)
  • 5.The data, procedures, and analysis
  • 6.Functions and examples of fi(ih) in GAP
    • 6.1The use of fi(ih) as a preposition with a locative function meaning ‘in’ (GA and GAP)
    • 6.2As an existential fi(ih) (GA and GAP)
    • 6.3As an equative/predicative copula (GAP innovation)
    • 6.4A syntactic tool to achieve verbal predication (GAP innovation)
    • 6.5In predicative possessive constructions (have-constructions; GAP innovation)
  • 7. Fi(ih) in GAP: Gradual grammaticalization/grammaticalization chain
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Note
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.16026.mob
References (36)
References
Al-Azraqi, M. 2010. Pidginisation in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Media Presentation. Arabic and the Media: Linguistic Analyses and Applications ed. by R. Bassiouney, 159–173. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Albakrawi, H. 2012. The Linguistic Effect of Foreign Asian Workers on the Arabic Pidgin in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 2:9.127–133.Google Scholar
Almoaily, M. 2008. A Data-Based Description of Urdu Pidgin Arabic. Master’s Thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
2012. Language Variation in Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
2014. Language Variation in Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters ed. by I. Buchstaller, A. Holmberg & M. Almoaily, 57–83. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakir, M. J. 2010. Notes on the Verbal System of Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages 25:2.201–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boretzky, N. 1983. Kreolsprachen, Substrate und Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bruyn, A. 2009. Grammaticalization in Creoles Ordinary and Not-So-Ordinary Cases. Studies in Language 33:2.312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & O. Dahl. 1989. The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World. Studies in Language 131.51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Esseesy, M. 2010. Grammaticalization of Arabic Prepositions and Subordinators: A Corpus-Based Study. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Where did Late Merge Go? Grammaticalization as Feature Economy. Studia Linguistica 62:3.287–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The Linguistic Cycle and the Language Faculty. Language and Linguistics Compass 7:4.233–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. 1992. Grammaticalization Chains. Studies in Language 16:2.335–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. On Contact-Induced Grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27:3.529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobrom, A. 1996. An Analysis of the Arabic Pidgin Spoken by Indian Workers in Saudi Arabia. Master’s Thesis, University of Kansas; Lawrence, KS (USA).Google Scholar
Holm, J. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles: Theory and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. Approaches to Grammaticalization ed. by E. Traugott & B. Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahr, E. 2003. The Emergence of a TMA Grammatical Device in a Stable Pidgin: The Russenorsk Preverbal po Construction. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 18:1.121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. 2000. Is There such a Thing as “Grammaticalization?” Language Sciences 23:2–3.163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S. & V. Yip. 2009. Contact-Induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition. Studies in Language 33:2.366–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mensah, E. 2012. Grammaticalization in Nigerian Pidgin. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura 17:2.167–179.Google Scholar
Michaelis, S., P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath & M. Huber. 2013. Introduction. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (vol. 11) ed. by S. Michaelis, P. Maurer, M. Haspelmath, & M. Huber, xxi–xxiii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Næss, U. G. 2008. “Gulf Pidgin Arabic”: Individual Strategies or a Structured Variety? Master’s Thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Parkvall, M. & P. Bakker. 2013. Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide ed. by P. Bakker & Y. Matras, 15–64. Boston & Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. 2008. The Emergence of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. R. 1990. Pidginization in Gulf Arabic: A First Report. Anthropological Linguistics 32:1–2.83–119.Google Scholar
Smith, K. 2011. Grammaticalization. Language and Linguistics Compass 5:6.367–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. 2000. The Story of kom in Nigerian Pidgin English. Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles 211.353–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Versteegh, Kees
2022. Marking statements of fact in early pidgins. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 37:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.