Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.192–229

An analysis of morphosyntactic variation in the Old Spanish future and conditional

| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The presence of two forms of the future and conditional paradigms in Old Spanish is well-attested. The analytic form, which was marked by a mesoclitic, was more syntactically restricted, while the synthetic form, which surfaced with either a proclitic or an enclitic, was essentially free to appear in any syntactic context. It is notable that the analytic form was only acceptable in contexts in which finite verbs obligatorily hosted enclitics. In this article, I test various morphosyntactic factors to determine the level of variation among the analytic and synthetic future and conditional forms across six centuries of Old Spanish. The factors of verb tense, preverbal constituent, and verb stem morphology significantly affect the emergence of mesoclisis or enclisis, as does the century during which the verb is produced; however, subject expression is not a significant factor.

Keywords: future, conditional, analytic, synthetic, Old Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
    • 2.1Company Company (1985, 2006)
    • 2.2 Company Company & Medina Urrea (1999)
  • 3.The current study
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Variables
      • 3.2.1Dependent variable: Mesoclisis/analyticity or enclisis/syntheticity
      • 3.2.2Independent factors
        • 3.2.2.1Century
        • 3.2.2.2Verb tense
        • 3.2.2.3Subject expression
        • 3.2.2.4Preverbal constituents
        • 3.2.2.5Morphological complexity
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Century
    • 4.2Verb tense
    • 4.3Subject expression
    • 4.4Preverbal constituent
    • 4.5Verbal stem morphology
    • 4.6Tense of verb over time
    • 4.7Preverbal constituents over time
    • 4.8Verbal stem morphology over time
  • 5.Discussion of results
    • 5.1Time period
    • 5.2Other factors with respect to time
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Literary sources and corpora
  • References
Published online: 27 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17016.gra
References

Literary sources and corpora

Bailey, Matthew
ed. 2013 El cantar de Mío Cid. Available at [URL].
Davies, Mark
2002– Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. Available at [URL].
Rojas, Fernando de
1499 La Celestina. Available at [URL].
1499 La Celestina. (James Mabbe, Trans.). Available at [URL].
Adams, James Noel
2013 Social Variation and the Latin Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alboiu, Gabriela & Virginia Hill
2012 Early Modern Romanian and Wackernagel’s Law. SKY Journal of Linguistics 251.7–28.Google Scholar
Alboiu, Gabriela, Virginia Hill & Ioanna Sitaridou
2015 Discourse-driven V-to-C in Early Modern Romanian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33:4.1057–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anipa, Kormi
2001 A Critical Examination of Linguistic Variation in Golden-Age Spanish. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Barry, Anita K.
1987 Clitic Pronoun Position in Thirteenth-Century Spanish. Hispanic Review 55:2.213–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca
eds. 2005 Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1995 Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law. Clause Structure and Language Change ed. by Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts, 325–344. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouzouita, Miriam
2016 La posposición pronominal con futuros y condicionales en el códice escurialense I.i.6: un examen de varias hipótesis morfosintácticas. Lingüística de corpus y lingüística histórica iberorrománica ed. by Johannes Kabatek, 270–298. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Ian Roberts
2002 Clause Structure and X-second. Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 11 ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 123–166. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción
1985 Los futuros en el español medieval sus orígenes y su evolución. Nueva Revista de Filologia Hispánica 34:1.48–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 La gramaticalización en la historia del español. Medievalia 351.3–61.Google Scholar
2006 Tiempos de formación romance II: los futuros y condicionales. Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española, primera parte: La frase verbal ed. by Concepción Company Company, 349–422. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica y Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción & Alfonso Medina Urrea
1999 Sintaxis motivada pragmáticamente: futuros analíticos y futuros sintéticos en el español medieval. Revista de Filología Española 79:1–2.65–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João
ed. 2000 Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, Inês & Gabriela Matos
2000 Romance Clitics and the Minimalist Program. In João Costa, ed., 116–142.Google Scholar
Duarte, Inês, Gabriela Matos & Anabela Gonçalves
2005 Pronominal Clitics in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4:2.113–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Martín, Patricia
2008 Análisis del funcionamiento de los futuros analíticos y sintéticos en cuatro obras de los Siglos de Oro. Res Diachronicae 61.40–59.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
2011 La lengua de Castilla y la formación del español. Madrid: Real Academia Española.Google Scholar
Fernández Rubiera, Francisco J.
2010 Force°, Finiteness°, and the Placement of Clitics in Western Iberian Romance Languages. Estudos de Lingüística Galega 21.75–95.Google Scholar
2014 When Phonology Undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian Enclitic Structures. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 401.85–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Lamar A.
2015 The History of the Future: Morphology, Syntax, and Grammaticalization. University of Georgia PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2016 A Diachronic Account of First-position Clitic Avoidance in Old Spanish Perfect Constructions. Paper presented at Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2016 (HLS 2016), Georgetown University, Washington, 7–9 October 2016.
2017 Enclisis and Interpolation in Old Spanish as Evidence of Gradient Strength of FP in Ibero-Romance. Paper presented at Spanish Linguistics in North Carolina Conference 2017 (SLINKI 2017), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 11 February 2017.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Javens, Charles
1964 A Study of Old Spanish Syntax: The Fifteenth Century. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M.
1987 From Latin to Spanish, Vol. I: Historical Phonology and Morphology of the Spanish Language. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Luís, Ana & Andrew Spencer
2005 A Paradigm Function Account of ‘Mesoclisis’ in European Portuguese. Yearbook of Morphology 2004 ed. by Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle, 177–228. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria
2003a Deficient Pronouns and Linguistic Change in Portuguese and Spanish. Romance Language and Linguistic Theory 2001: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’, Amsterdam, 6–8 December 2001 ed. by Josep Quer, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scorretti, Petra Sleeman & Els Verheugd, 213–230. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 245.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b From Unity to Diversity in Romance Syntax: Portuguese and Spanish. Aspects of Multilingualism in European Language History ed. by Kurt Braunmüller & Gisella Ferraresi, 201–233. (= Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, 2.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Clitic Placement, VP-Ellipsis and Scrambling in Romance. In Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, eds., 175–193.Google Scholar
Monachesi, Paola
2005 The Verbal Complex in Romance: A Case Study in Grammatical Interfaces. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Bernal, Jesús
2004 La morfología de los futuros románicos: las formas con metátesis. Revista de Filología Románica 211.121–169.Google Scholar
Nicolae, Alexandru & Dana Niculescu
2015 Pronominal Clitics in Old Romanian: The Tobler-Mussafia Law. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 60:2–3.223–242.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph A.
2006 Gramática histórica del español. Edición actualizada. Traducido: Blanca Ribera de Madariaga. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrisio
2005 Verb Movement and Clitics: Variation and Change in Portuguese. In Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, eds., 48–59.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo P.
1999 Directionality of Cliticization in European Portuguese: Left or Right?. Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Mario Saltarelli ed. by Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martin, 219–232. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 187.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
2000 Clitic Positions and Verb Movement. In João Costa, ed., 266–297.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo & Juan Uriagereka
2005 Clitic Placement in Western Iberian: A Minimalist View. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax ed. by Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne, 639–697. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 A Formal Account of Grammaticalisation in the History of Romance Futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13:1–2.219–258.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2002 The History of the Future. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change ed. by David Lightfoot, 23–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
1990 Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Villar, Luis
1996 Merge and Cliticization in Old Romance Futures/Conditionals. Grammatical Theory and Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 25th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXV) Seattle, 2–4 March 1995 ed. by Karen T. Zagona, 239–250. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 133.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995a An F Position in Western Romance. Discourse Configurational Languages ed. by Katalin É. Kiss, 153–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1995b Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26:1.79–123.Google Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica
2014 Auxiliary Encliticization in 16th Century Romanian: Restrictions and Regularities. Linguistica Atlantica 33:2.71–86.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Herce, Borja
2020. Alignment of forms in Spanish verbal inflection: the gang poner, tener, venir, salir, valer as a window into the nature of paradigmatic analogy and predictability. Morphology 30:2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.