Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Understanding language genealogy: Alternatives to the tree model
Edited by Siva Kalyan, Alexandre François and Harald Hammarström
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1] 2019
► pp. 168–177
Commentary

When the waves meet the trees

A response to Jacques and List

 | Australian National University
 | LaTTiCe (CNRS; ENS-PSL; Paris 3-USPC) | Australian National University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two ways of understanding the family-tree model
  • 3.Methodology and goals of Historical Glottometry
    • 3.1Definition and identification of “shared innovations”
    • 3.2Reading diachrony in glottometric diagrams
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.18019.kal
References (21)
References
Baum, David A. & Stacey D. Smith. 2013. Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1884. Zur Frage nach den Verwandtschaftsverhältnissen der indogermanischen Sprachen. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 11, 226–256.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2013. Who Inherits What, When? Toward a Theory of Contact, Substrates, and Superimposition Zones. Language Typology and Historical Contingency: In Honor of Johanna Nichols ed. by Balthasar Bickel, Lenore Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake, 219–240. (= Typological Studies in Language, 104.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2011. Social Ecology and Language History in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A Tale of Divergence and Convergence. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1:2.175–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans, 161–189. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2017. Méthode comparative et chaînages linguistiques: Pour un modèle diffusionniste en généalogie des langues. Diffusion: implantation, affinités, convergence ed. by Jean-Léo Léonard, 43–82. (= Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XXIV.) Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Galtier, Nicolas & Vincent Daubin. 2008. Dealing with Incongruence in Phylogenomic Analyses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 363:1512.4023–4029. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. & Russell D. Gray. 2012. Basic Vocabulary and Bayesian Phylolinguistics: Issues of Understanding and Representation. Diachronica 29:4.523–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1. 128–166 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the Comparative Method from the Tree Model: A Framework for Historical Glottometry. Let’s Talk About Trees: Genetic Relationships of Languages and Their Phylogenic Representation ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 59–90. (= Senri Ethnological Studies, 98). Ōsaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Leskien, August. 1876. Die Declination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Maddison, Wayne P. 1997. Gene Trees in Species Trees. Systematic Biology 451:523–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madigan, David & Jeremy York. 1995. Bayesian Graphical Models for Discrete Data. International Statistical Review 63:2.215–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Mark & Andrew Meade. 2004. A Phylogenetic Mixture Model for Detecting Pattern-Heterogeneity in Gene Sequence or Character-State Data. Systematic Biology 531:571–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm D. 1997. Social Networks and Kinds of Speech-Community Event. Archaeology and Language 1: Theoretical and Methodological Orientations ed. by Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs, 209–261. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1995 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Éditions Payot & Rivages.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1900. Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten. Probe-Vorlesung, gehalten zu Leipzig am 30. April 1870. Graz.Google Scholar
Wen, Dingqiao, Yun Yu & Luay Nakhleh. 2016. Bayesian Inference of Reticulate Phylogenies Under the Multispecies Network Coalescent. PLOS Genetics 12:5.e1006006. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Elgh, Erik & Harald Hammarström
2024. The dialect chain tree. Diachronica 41:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Frederik
2024. An agent-based modelling approach to wave-like diversification of language families. Diachronica 41:3 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo
List, Johann-Mattis
2023. Evolutionary Aspects of Language Change. In Evolutionary Thinking Across Disciplines [Synthese Library, 478], ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Tamburelli, Marco
2021. Taking taxonomy seriously in linguistics: Intelligibility as a criterion of demarcation between languages and dialects. Lingua 256 ► pp. 103068 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.