Productivity, richness, and diversity of light verb constructions in the history of American English
This study provides an empirical analysis of productivity in Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) in the history of
American English. LVCs contain a semantically light verb like make or take that may be paired
with an abstract nominal object, as in make an assumption or take charge. Using a 406-million
word corpus of texts written between 1810 and 2009, we track the frequency of LVCs and analyze the range of light verb + nominal
object pairings. Using statistical measurements of biodiversity from the field of ecology, we evaluate the hypothesis that “the
rich get richer” among light verbs: the most frequent verbs become more frequent and more diverse, occurring with an ever-growing
variety of different NP complements. The results contribute to ongoing discussions in cross-linguistic, diachronic research on
reasons for the growth of LVCs, the gradient nature of linguistic productivity, and the role of exemplars in the interaction
between type and token frequencies during periods of linguistic change.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Classification of LVCs
- 3.Data collection
- 4.Statistical analysis of LVCs
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
References
Akimoto, Minoje & Laurel J. Brinton
Albert, Réka & Albert-László Barabási
2002 Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks.
Reviews of Modern Physics 741.47–97.
Algeo, John
1995 Having a Look at the Expanded Predicate.
The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description ed. by
Bas Aarts &
Charles F. Meyer, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allerton, David J.
2003 Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis.
Baayen, Harald
2009 Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity.
Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 21 ed. by
Anke Lüdeling &
Merja Kytö, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Barabási, Albert-László
2016 Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barðdal, Johanna
2011 The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Approach.
Lingua 121:1.60–79.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea
Bergs, Alexander
2005 Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter.
Bonial, Claire Nicole
2014 Take a Look at This! Form, Function and Productivity of English Light Verb Constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA).
Bonial, Claire, Julia Bonn, Kathryn Conger, Jena Hwang, Martha Palmer & Nicholas Reese
2015 PropBank Annotation Guidelines. Center for Computational Language and Education Research: University of Colorado at Boulder.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Minoji Akimoto
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner & Victor Kuperman
2014 Concreteness Ratings for Forty-Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas.
Behavior Research Methods 46:3.904–911.
Butt, Miriam
2003 The Light Verb Jungle.
Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 91.1–49.
Butt, Miriam
2010 The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away.
Complex Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective ed. by
Mengistu Amberber,
Brett Baker &
Mark Harvey, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri
2013 Diachronic Pertinacity of Light Verbs.
Lingua 1351.7–29.
Bybee, Joan
1995 Regular Morphology and the Lexicon.
Language and Cognitive Processes 10:1.425–455.
Bybee, Joan
2006 From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.
Language 82:4.711–733.
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan & David Eddington
2006 A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming’.
Language 82:2.323–355.
Chen, Wei-Te, Claire Bonial & Martha Palmer
2015 English Light Verb Construction Identification Using Lexical Knowledge.
Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. URL:
[URL]
Claridge, Claudia
2000 Multi-Word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Clark, Eve V.
1995 The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clausner, Timothy C. & William A. Croft
1997 Productivity and Schematicity in Metaphors.
Cognitive Science 21:3.247–282.
Davies, Mark
2010 The Corpus of Historical American English. URL:
[URL]
Fazly, Afsaneh
2007 Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge about Multiword Predicates. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.
Fellbaum, Christiane
1998 WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. URL:
[URL].
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck
2002 Background to FrameNet.
International Journal of Lexicography, 16:3.235–250.
Gárate, Teresa Moralejo
2003 Composite Predicates in Middle English. Munich: Lincom.
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, Martin
2017 Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language.
The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives ed. by
Marianne Hundt,
Sandra Mollin &
Simone E. Pfenninger, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hiltunen, R.
1999 Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs.
Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by
Laural Brinton &
Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt & Joybrato Mukherjee
2011 Indian English: An Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-Derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes.
Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 129:3–4.258–280.
Iglesias-Rábade, L.
2001 Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken
.
Studia Neophilologica 731:143–163.
Jarvis, Scott
2013 Capturing the Diversity in Lexical Diversity.
Language Learning 631:87–106.
Jespersen, Otto
1942 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin.
Johnson, Keith
1997 Speech Perception without Speaker Normalization: An Exemplar Model.
Talker Variability in Speech Processing ed. by
Keith Johnson &
John W. Mullennix, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein
1997 Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Doctoral Thesis, Essex University, England.
Kearns, Kate
2002 Light Verbs in English. URL:
[URL]
Koplenig, Alexander
2015 Using the Parameters of the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law to Measure Diachronic, Lexical, Syntactical, and Stylistic Changes: A Large-Scale Corpus Analysis.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1.1–34.
Krenn, Brigitte
2000 The Usual Suspects: Data-Oriented Models for Identification and Representation of Lexical Collocations. Doctoral Dissertation, Saarland University, Saarbrücken (Germany).
Kunegis, Jérôme, Marcel Blattner & Christine Moser
2013 Preferential Attachment in Online Networks: Measurement and Explanations.
Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 205–214.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Laporte, Samantha
2017 Light Verb Constructions in Second-Language Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Nativization in Hong Kong English. Paper presented at Light Verb Constructions in Germanic Languages, Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles, November 2017.
Live, Anna H.
1973 The Take-Have Phrasal in English.
Linguistics 951.31–50.
Magurran, Anne
2013 Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Matsumoto, Meiko
1999 Composite Predicates in Middle English.
Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by
Laurel J. Brinton &
Minoji Akimoto, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mitchell, David
2015 Type-Token Models: A Comparative Study.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 22:1.1–21.
Nosofsky, Robert M.
1988 Similarity, Frequency, and Category Representation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 141.54–65.
Ninio, Anat
1999 Pathbreaking Verbs in Syntactic Development and the Question of Prototypical Transitivity.
Journal of Child Language 261.619–653.
North, Ryan
2005 Computational Measures of the Acceptability of Light Verb Constructions. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2002 Word-specific Phonetics.
Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by
Carlos Gussenhoven &
Natasha Warner, 101–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rigney, Daniel
2010 The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ronan, Patricia & Gerold Schneider
Shahrokny-Prehn, Arian & Silke Höche
2011 Rising through the Registers: A Corpus-based Account of the Stylistic Constraints on Light Verb Constructions.
Corpus 101.239–257.
Shelley, Percy Bysshe
1840 A Defence of Poetry.
Essays, Letters from Abroad, Translations and Fragments ed. by
Mary Shelley, 1–57. London: Edward Moxon.
Stevenson, Suzanne, Afsaneh Fazly & Ryan North
2004 Statistical Measures of the Semi-Productivity of Light Verb Constructions.
Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Integrating Processing, 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Sundquist, John D.
2018 A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:3.260–306.
Suttle, Laura & Adele E. Goldberg
2011 The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction.
Linguistics 49:6.1237–1269.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
Tu, Yuancheng & Dan Roth
2011 Learning English Light Verb Constructions: Contextual or Statistical.
Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: from Parsing and Generation to the Real World, 31–39. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Tweedie, Fiona J. & R. Harald Baayen
1998 How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective.
Computers and the Humanities 32:5.323–352.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Giparaitė, Judita
2024.
A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English.
Kalbotyra 76
► pp. 18 ff.
SUNDQUIST, JOHN D.
2022.
An exemplar-based approach to composite predicates in the history of American English.
English Language and Linguistics 26:2
► pp. 413 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.