Productivity, richness, and diversity of light verb constructions in the history of American English
This study provides an empirical analysis of productivity in Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) in the history of
American English. LVCs contain a semantically light verb like make or take that may be paired
with an abstract nominal object, as in make an assumption or take charge. Using a 406-million
word corpus of texts written between 1810 and 2009, we track the frequency of LVCs and analyze the range of light verb + nominal
object pairings. Using statistical measurements of biodiversity from the field of ecology, we evaluate the hypothesis that “the
rich get richer” among light verbs: the most frequent verbs become more frequent and more diverse, occurring with an ever-growing
variety of different NP complements. The results contribute to ongoing discussions in cross-linguistic, diachronic research on
reasons for the growth of LVCs, the gradient nature of linguistic productivity, and the role of exemplars in the interaction
between type and token frequencies during periods of linguistic change.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Classification of LVCs
- 3.Data collection
- 4.Statistical analysis of LVCs
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (78)
References
Albert, Réka & Albert-László Barabási. 2002. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 741.47–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Algeo, John. 1995. Having a Look at the Expanded Predicate. The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description ed. by Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer, 203–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allerton, David J. 2003. Stretched Verb Constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, Harald. 2009. Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, vol. 21 ed. by Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barabási, Albert-László. 2016. Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, Johanna. 2011. The Rise of Dative Substitution in the History of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar Approach. Lingua 121:1.60–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonial, Claire Nicole. 2014. Take a Look at This! Form, Function and Productivity of English Light Verb Constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (USA).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonial, Claire, Julia Bonn, Kathryn Conger, Jena Hwang, Martha Palmer & Nicholas Reese. 2015. PropBank Annotation Guidelines. Center for Computational Language and Education Research: University of Colorado at Boulder.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner & Victor Kuperman. 2014. Concreteness Ratings for Forty-Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 46:3.904–911. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The Light Verb Jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 91.1–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away. Complex Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective ed. by Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2013. Diachronic Pertinacity of Light Verbs. Lingua 1351.7–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10:1.425–455. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language 82:4.711–733. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan & David Eddington. 2006. A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming’. Language 82:2.323–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Wei-Te, Claire Bonial & Martha Palmer. 2015. English Light Verb Construction Identification Using Lexical Knowledge. Proceedings from the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. URL: [URL]
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-Word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. 1995. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clausner, Timothy C. & William A. Croft. 1997. Productivity and Schematicity in Metaphors. Cognitive Science 21:3.247–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English. URL: [URL]
Fazly, Afsaneh. 2007. Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge about Multiword Predicates. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. URL: [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck. 2002. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16:3.235–250. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gárate, Teresa Moralejo. 2003. Composite Predicates in Middle English. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, Martin. 2017. Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives ed. by Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiltunen, R. 1999. Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laural Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011. Indian English: An Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-Derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia: Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 129:3–4.258–280. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iglesias-Rábade, L. 2001. Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken
. Studia Neophilologica 731:143–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jarvis, Scott. 2013. Capturing the Diversity in Lexical Diversity. Language Learning 631:87–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech Perception without Speaker Normalization: An Exemplar Model. Talker Variability in Speech Processing ed. by Keith Johnson & John W. Mullennix, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein. 1997. Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Doctoral Thesis, Essex University, England.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kearns, Kate. 2002. Light Verbs in English. URL: [URL]
Koplenig, Alexander. 2015. Using the Parameters of the Zipf-Mandelbrot Law to Measure Diachronic, Lexical, Syntactical, and Stylistic Changes: A Large-Scale Corpus Analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1.1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krenn, Brigitte. 2000. The Usual Suspects: Data-Oriented Models for Identification and Representation of Lexical Collocations. Doctoral Dissertation, Saarland University, Saarbrücken (Germany).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kunegis, Jérôme, Marcel Blattner & Christine Moser. 2013. Preferential Attachment in Online Networks: Measurement and Explanations. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 205–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laporte, Samantha. 2017. Light Verb Constructions in Second-Language Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Investigation of Nativization in Hong Kong English. Paper presented at Light Verb Constructions in Germanic Languages, Université Saint-Louis, Bruxelles, November 2017.
Live, Anna H. 1973. The Take-Have Phrasal in English. Linguistics 951.31–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magurran, Anne. 2013. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Meiko. 1999. Composite Predicates in Middle English. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, David. 2015. Type-Token Models: A Comparative Study. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 22:1.1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1988. Similarity, Frequency, and Category Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 141.54–65.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ninio, Anat. 1999. Pathbreaking Verbs in Syntactic Development and the Question of Prototypical Transitivity. Journal of Child Language 261.619–653. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
North, Ryan. 2005. Computational Measures of the Acceptability of Light Verb Constructions. Master’s Thesis, University of Toronto.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2002. Word-specific Phonetics. Laboratory Phonology 7 ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner, 101–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rigney, Daniel. 2010. The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shahrokny-Prehn, Arian & Silke Höche. 2011. Rising through the Registers: A Corpus-based Account of the Stylistic Constraints on Light Verb Constructions. Corpus 101.239–257. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1840. A Defence of Poetry. Essays, Letters from Abroad, Translations and Fragments ed. by Mary Shelley, 1–57. London: Edward Moxon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stevenson, Suzanne, Afsaneh Fazly & Ryan North. 2004. Statistical Measures of the Semi-Productivity of Light Verb Constructions. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Integrating Processing, 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sundquist, John D. 2018. A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:3.260–306. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suttle, Laura & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. The Partial Productivity of Constructions as Induction. Linguistics 49:6.1237–1269. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1999. A Historical Overview of Complex Predicate Types. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English ed. by Laurel J. Brinton & Minoji Akimoto, 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tu, Yuancheng & Dan Roth. 2011. Learning English Light Verb Constructions: Contextual or Statistical. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: from Parsing and Generation to the Real World, 31–39. Association for Computational Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tweedie, Fiona J. & R. Harald Baayen. 1998. How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective. Computers and the Humanities 32:5.323–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Giparaitė, Judita
2024.
A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English.
Kalbotyra 76
► pp. 18 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
SUNDQUIST, JOHN D.
2022.
An exemplar-based approach to composite predicates in the history of American English.
English Language and Linguistics 26:2
► pp. 413 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.