Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp.1–59

The Duhumbi perspective on Proto-Western Kho-Bwa onsets

| SOAS University of LondonUnited Kingdom | Bern UniversitySwitzerland
The eight Western Kho-Bwa varieties are spoken in western Arunachal Pradesh in Northeast India and form a small, coherent sub-group of the Tibeto-Burman (Trans-Himalayan / Sino-Tibetan) language family.
This paper presents 96 sound correspondences, mainly between the two Western Kho-Bwa varieties Duhumbi and Khoitam, with additional evidence from other Western Kho-Bwa varieties and other Tibeto-Burman languages whenever deemed illustrative. On basis of these sound correspondences, I propose 282 Western Kho-Bwa proto-forms including a total of 92 onsets. The less common reconstructed Western Kho-Bwa onsets are the uvular onsets and the voiceless nasal and approximant onsets.
A unique innovation of the Western Kho-Bwa languages, and indeed the Kho-Bwa languages in general, is the correspondence of initial *s- in other Tibeto-Burman languages to a vocal onset in Proto-Western Kho-Bwa and its descendent varieties. Another relatively unique innovation is the correspondence between Western Kho-Bwa obstruent onsets *b- and *g- ~ *kʰ- ~ *k- and other Tibeto-Burman nasal onsets *m- and *ŋ-, respectively.
Keywords: Western Kho-Bwa, proto-language, historical-comparative linguistics, Sartang, Sherdukpen
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • The Kho-Bwa cluster
    • The Western Kho-Bwa languages
    • The data
    • The methodology
    • Notational conventions
  • 2.Plosive onsets
    • 2.1Trivial correspondences
    • 2.2Fate of rhotic onset clusters
    • 2.3Distinct reflexes before /i/
    • 2.4Minor correspondences
  • 3.Vocal onsets
  • 4.Nasal onsets
    • 4.1Trivial correspondences
    • 4.2Minor correspondences
  • 5.Fricative onsets
    • 5.1Trivial correspondences
    • 5.2Palatalised onsets
    • 5.3Voiceless onsets
    • 5.4Minor correspondences
  • 6.Affricate onsets
    • 6.1Trivial correspondences
    • 6.2Palatalised onsets
    • 6.3Labialised onsets
    • 6.4Minor correspondences
  • 7.Approximant onsets
    • 7.1Trivial correspondences
    • 7.2Voiceless onsets
    • 7.3Minor correspondences
  • 8.Sound correspondences in loans
  • 9.Synposis
    • 9.1Notable sound correspondences between the varieties
    • 9.2Notable sound correspondences with other Tibeto-Burman languages
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.19021.bod
References (82)
References
Abraham, Binny, Kara Sako, Elina Kinny & Isapdaile Zeliang. 2018 [2005]. A Sociolinguistic Research Among Selected Groups in Western Arunachal Pradesh Highlighting Monpa. SIL Electronic Survey Reports. [URL]
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1998. The First Person Pronoun in Archaic Chinese, with a Note on Duplex Characters. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 21:2.1–2.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger & Mark W. Post. 2014. Rethinking Sino-Tibetan Phylogeny from the Perspective of Northeast Indian Languages. Trans-Himalayan Linguistics ed. by Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill, 71–104. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus. 2014a. Ethnolinguistic Survey of Westernmost Arunachal Pradesh – a Fieldworker’s Impressions. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:2.198–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Notes on the Settlement of the Gongri River Valley of Western Arunachal Pradesh. Bulletin of Tibetology 50:1/2.153–190.Google Scholar
. 2018a. Khispi Lexicon. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Duhumbi Lexicon. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018c. Sartang Lexicon – Overview File. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018d. Sherdukpen Lexicon – Overview File. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. The Duhumbi Perspective on Proto-Western Kho-Bwa Rhymes. Die Sprache 52:2.141–176.Google Scholar
. 2020. Proto-Western Kho-Bwa: Regionally Relevant Basic Vocabulary Elicitation List. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Proto-Western Kho-Bwa – Reconstructing a Community’s Past through Language.
Bodt, Timotheus A. & Ismael Lieberherr. 2015. First Notes on the Phonology and Classification of the Bangru Language of India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1.66–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A., Nathan W. Hill & Johann-Mattis List. 2018. Prediction Experiment for Missing Words in Kho-Bwa Language Data. Open Science Framework Preregistrations October 5. [URL]
Bodt, Timotheus A. & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Testing the Predictive Force of the Comparative Method: An Ongoing Experiment on Unattested Words in Western Kho-Bwa Languages. Papers in Historical Phonology 41.22–44. [URL]
Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus & Johann-Mattis List (forthcoming). Benefits of Reflex Prediction: A Case Study of Western Kho-Bwa. Diachronica.
Bradley, David. 1977. Bisu Dialects, Languages and History in East Asia. Festschrift for Tatsuo Nishida on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday ed. by Paul K. Eguchi et al., 32–59. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar
. 1979. Historical Sketch of the Bisu Language. Minzu Yuwen 41.35–41.Google Scholar
. 1985. Nasality in Bisu and Bisoid. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies Presented to André-G. Haudricourt ed. by S. Ratanakul et al., 234–263. Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Coblin, Weldon S. 1991. Notes on Old Tibetan rje-blas. Tibetan History and Language: Studies Dedicated to Uray Géza on his Seventieth Birthday [Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie Buddhismuskunde 26] ed. by Ernst Steinkellner, 63–110. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A Grammar of Mongsen Ao ( Mouton grammar library 39 ). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalash. 1968. An Introduction to Central Monpa. Shillong: North-East Frontier Agency.Google Scholar
Deuri, R. K. 1982. The Sulungs. Shillong: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Dondrup, Rinchin. 1988. A Handbook on Sherdukpen Language. Itanagar: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
. 1990. Bugun Language Guide. Itanagar: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
. 2004. An Introduction to Boot Monpa Language. Itanagar: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Doney, Lewis. 2013. Emperor, Dharmaraja, Bodhisattva? Inscriptions from the Reign of Khri Srong lde brtsan. Journal of Research Institute Kobe City University 511.63–84.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas – An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig, eds. 2019. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 22nd ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International. [URL]
Genetti, Carol. 2016. The Tibeto-Burman Languages of South Asia: The Languages, Histories, and Genetic Classification. The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide ed. by Hans Heinrich Hock & Elena Bashir, 130–145. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath, eds. 2019. Glottolog. Version 3.3. Leipzig. [URL]
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor, eds. 2009. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1970. Consonnes nasales et demi-nasales dans l’évolution des systèmes phonologiques. Actes du 10e Congrès international des Linguistes, Bucarest, 28 août-2 septembre 1967 41.105–108. Bucarest: Académie de la République socialiste de Roumanie.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2019. The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. & Johann-Mattis List. 2017. Challenges of Annotation and Analysis in Computer-Assisted Language Comparison: A Case Study on Burmish Language. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 3:1.47–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2007. A Shared Suppletive Pattern in the Pronominal Systems of Chang Naga and Southern Qiang. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 36:1.61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. On Coblin’s Law. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, ed. by Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken, 155–165. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2015. Le verbe de mouvement ‘voler’ en sino-tibétain. Panchronica 16 October 2015, [URL]
. 2016. Dictionnaire Japhug-Chinois-Français, version 1.1. Paris: Projet HimalCo.Google Scholar
. 2017. A Reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti Verb Roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 381.177–215.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Dhan Bahadur Rai & Kumar Yadav. 2015. Khaling-Nepali-English Verb Dictionary, Version 1.0. Paris: Projet HimalCo.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, François. 2015. An Introduction to Sherdukpen [Diversitas Linguarum 39]. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Jäschke, Heinrich A. 1992 [1881]. A Tibetan-English Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Joseph, U. V. & Robbins Burling. 2006. The Comparative Phonology of the Boro Garo Languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
Lander-Portnoy, Maury. 2013. Let Buguns be Buguns: A Preliminary Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology of the Bugun Language. MA thesis, Swarthmore College.Google Scholar
Lǐ, Dàqín. 2004. Sūlóngyǔ yánjiū [Research on Puroik]. Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [National Minorities Publisher].Google Scholar
Lieberherr, Ismael. 2015. A Progress Report on the Historical Phonology and Affiliation of Puroik. North East Indian Linguistics 7 ed. by Linda Konnerth et al., 235–286. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 2017. A Grammar of Bulu Puroik. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Lieberherr, Ismael & Timotheus A. Bodt. 2017. Sub-Grouping Kho-Bwa based on Cognate Core Vocabulary. Himalayan Linguistics 16:2.2–40. [URL]
List, Johann-Mattis. 2017. A Web-Based Interactive Tool for Creating, Inspecting, Editing, and Publishing Etymological Datasets. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. System Demonstrations ed. by Mirella Lapata, Phil Blunsom & Alexander Koller, 9–12. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Automatic Inference of Sound Correspondence Patterns across Multiple Languages. Computational Linguistics 1:45.1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Simon Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi & Robert Forkel. 2018. LingPy. A Python Library for Quantitative Tasks in Historical Linguistics. Jena. [URL]
Lorrain, James H. 1940. Dictionary of the Lushai Language [Bibliotheca Indica 261]. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1972. The Loloish Tonal Split Revisited [Research Monograph No. 7]. Berkeley: Centre for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2009. Stable Roots in Sino-Tibetan/Tibeto-Burman. Senri Ethnological Studies 751.291–318.Google Scholar
Nishi, Yoshio. 1999. Four Papers on Burmese: Toward the History of Burmese (the Myanmar Language). Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo. 1966a. Bisu Language Research – Preliminary Studies in the Language of the Bisu in Thailand. Southeast Asian Research 4:1.65–87.Google Scholar
. 1966b. The Bisu Language System I. Southeast Asian Research 4.3:42–68.Google Scholar
Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A Grammar of Lepcha ( Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5 ). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling. 2017. The Tibeto-Burman Languages of Northeastern India. The Sino-Tibetan Languages ed. by Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla, 213–233. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2010. Hmong-Mien Language History. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Rutgers, Leopold. 1999. Puroik or Sulung of Arunachal Pradesh. Paper presented at the 5th Himalayan Languages Symposium. Kathmandu Guest House: Kathmandu.
Sagart, Laurent. 2014. A Note on Tibeto-Burman Bone Words and Chinese Pitchpipes. Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, ed. by Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell A. Van Auken, 179–183. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert. 1947. Hruso. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 121.184–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shorto, Harry L. 2006. A Mon-Khmer Comparative Dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 1998. Another Note on Old Tibetan rje-blas. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 21:2.3–4.Google Scholar
Stonor, Charles R. 1952. The Sulung Tribe of the Assam Himalayas. Anthropos 471.947–962.Google Scholar
Sūn, Hóngkāi, ed. 1991. Zàng-Miǎn-yǔ yǔyīn hé cíhuì [Tibeto-Burman Phonology and Lexicon]. Běijīng: Zhōngguó shèhuì kēxué chūbǎnshè [Chinese Social Sciences Press].Google Scholar
Sun, Tian-shin J. 1992. Review of Zangmianyu Yuyin He Cihui (Tibeto-Burman Phonology and Lexicon). Linguistics of Tibeto-Burman Area 151.73–113.Google Scholar
1993. A Historical-Comparative Study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman. Doctoral dissertation, Berkeley, University of California.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1971. The Origin and Diversification of Language. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Tsuguhito. 1995. Old Tibetan Contracts from Central Asia. Tokyo: Daizo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Tayeng, Aduk. 1990. Sulung Language Guide. Itanagar: Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Tshe-ring, rNam-rgyal, ed. 1997. Gǔ zàng wén cídiǎn [Old Tibetan dictionary]. Běijīng: Zhōngguó zàng xué chūbǎn shè [China Tibetology Publishing House].Google Scholar
Uebach, Helga & Zeisler, Bettina. 2008. rJe-blas, pha-los and Other Compounds with Suffix -s in Old Tibetan Texts. Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, ed. by Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer, 309–334. Halle: IITBS.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth. 2009. Proto-Kuki-Chin: A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Languages [STEDT Monograph 8]. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Xu, Shixuan. 2001. The Bisu Language [Languages of the World/Materials 411]. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Zhāng, Yísūn, ed. 1993. Zàng Hàn dà cídiǎn [The Tibetan-Chinese Dictionary]. 2nd ed. Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [National Publishing House].Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bodt, Timotheus A. & Johann-Mattis List
2022. Reflex prediction. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Mei-Shin, Timotheus A. Bodt & Tiago Tresoldi
2022. Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.