Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (2022) ► pp.282316
Aldridge, Edith
2011Antipassive in Austronesian Alignment Change. Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 311–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, Edith & Yuko Yanagida
Alexiadou, Artemis
2016English Psych Verbs and the Causative Alternation: A Case Study in the History of English. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 3:2.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Gianina Iordăchioaia
2014The Psych Causative Alternation. Lingua 1481.53–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1977On Mechanisms by Which Languages Become Ergative. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 317–363. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Hirofumi
1996Kanoo dooshi no seiritu ni tsuite [On the Formation of Potential Verbs]. Gobun kenkyu 811:1–12. Kyushu University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Ashwini Deo
2013A Historical Perspective on Dative Subjects in Indo-Aryan. Paper presented at the LFG13 Conference. University of Debrecen, Hungary.Google Scholar
Cardona, George
1970The Indo-Iranian Construction Mana (Mama) Kriam. Language 461.1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Candice C-H. & Richard K. Larson
2015Psych Verbs in English and Mandarin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 331.127–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. Syntactic Typology ed. by W. P. Lehman, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Direct and Indirect Explanations of Typological Regularities: The Case of Alignment Variations. Folia Linguistica 42:1.1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den, Richard Larson & Peter Ludow
2018Intensional Transitive Verbs and Abstract Clausal Complementation. Non-Propositional Intentionality ed. by Alex Grzankowski & Michelle Montague, 46–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language. 551.59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deo, Ashwini
2003Valency Change and Case Marking: Marathi Dative Experiencers. Handout from the Pioneer Workshop on Case, Valency and Transitivity.
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke & John Whitman
2018The Historical Source of the Bigrade Transitivity Alternations in Japanese. Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on Japanese and Beyond ed. by Taroo Kageyama & Wesley Jacobsen, 289–310. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gair, James W.
1990Subjects, Cases and Infl in Sinhala. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages ed. by Mahendra K. Verma & K. P. Mohanan, 13–41. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2014Changes in Psych-Verbs: A Reanalysis of Little v . Catalan Journal of Linguistics 131.99–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R.
1941Tunica. Handbook of American Indian Languages ed. by Franz Boas, 9–143. New York: Augustin.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Samuel J. Keyser
1993On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. The View from Building 20: Essyas in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger ed. by Ken Hale & S. J. Keyser, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA:MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2008On the Causative Construction. Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics ed by Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito, 20–53. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2004World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E.
1991On Identifying the Conceptual Restructuring of Passive as Ergative in Indo-Aryan. Paninian Studies ed. by Madhav M. Deshpande & Soraja Bhate, 177–200. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian studies.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro & Wesley M. Jacobsen
2016Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on Japanese and Beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1976Discourse Referents. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 363–385. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kikuta, Chiharu
2012Jodai nihongo no ga-kaku nituite [On the Case Marker ga in Old Japanese]. Dosisha Daigaku Jinbun Gakkai (The Literary Association) 891.89–123.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki
2004Non Canonical-Case Marking of Transitive Predicates in Japanese. Nihongo no bunseki to gengorukei [Analysis of Japanese and Linguistic typology] ed. by Taroo Kageyama & Hideki Kishimoto, 57–74. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
2016Stative and Existential/Possessive Predicates. Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word Formation ed. by Taroo Kageyama & Hideki Kishimoto, 559–598. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, Masatoshi
2008Nominative Object. The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics ed. by Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito, 141–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuginuki, Toru
1995Kodai nihongo ni okeru keiyooshi zoogohoo ni kansuru ichikoosatsu [A study of Adjectives and Their Derivations in Old Japanese]. Literature, Journal of the Faculty of Letters 1211.199–214. Nagoya: Nagoya University.Google Scholar
1996Kodai nihongo no keitai henka [Morphological Change in Old Japanese]. Osaka: Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S. Y.
1965Causative Forms in Japanese. Foundations of Language 11.30–50.Google Scholar
1992Case Marking, Canonical Sentence Patterns, and Counter-Equi in Japanese. Japanese Syntax and Semantics: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 271.222–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
2002The Grammar of Intensionality. Logical Form and Language ed. by Gerhard Preyer & George Peter, 228–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legate, A Julie
2014Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Split Intransitives, Experiencer Objects and Transimpersonal Constructions: (Re-)Establishing the Connection. The Typology of Semantic Alignment ed. by Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann, 76–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1974On Identifying the Remains of Deceased Clauses. Language Research 91.73–85.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
1989Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. (= Syntax and Semantics, 22.) New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Case, Argument Structure and Word Order. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Toshihiro
2016 Kanoo dooshi no seiritu [The Formation of Potential Verbs]. Nihongo no kenkyu [A Study of Japanese Language] 12:2.1–17.Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko & Tomoko Hashimoto
2004Three Pieces of Acquisition Evidence for the v-VP Frame. Nanzan Linguistics 11.1–19.Google Scholar
Ohno, Susumu
1977Shukaku joshi ga no seiritsu [The Development of the Nominative Case Particle ga ], Bungaku 451.102–117.Google Scholar
1978Bunpoo to goi [Grammar and Lexicon]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Payne, John R.
1980The Decay of Ergativity in Pamir Languages. Lingua 511.147–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce R.
1976From Passive to Ergative in Indo-Aryan. The Notion of Subject in Indo-Aryan Languages (=South Asian Studies, 2.) ed. by Manindra K. Verma, 195–211. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Ross, John
1976To Have and To Not Have Have. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald Hill ed. by Mohammad A. Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter, Vol. 11, 263–270. Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976The Grammar of Causative Constructions: A Conspectus. The Grammar of Causative Constructions: Syntax and Semantics 61 ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 1–42. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Dative Subject Constructions Twenty-Two Years Later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 291.45–76.Google Scholar
2001Non-Canonical Constructions in Japanese. Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikehenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi, 307–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi
2001Dative Subject Constructions in South Asian Languages. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics ed. by Peri Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao, 311–347. Delhi: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Non-Canonical Constructions in Japanese: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Handbook of Japanese Contrastive Linguistics ed. by Pardeshi Prashant & Taro Kageyama, 57–107. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki
2000Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verma, Mahendra K. & K. P. Mohanan
1990Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford: CSLI Publication.Google Scholar
Whitman, John
2007The Source of the Bigrade Conjugation and Stem Shape in Pre-Old Japanese. Paper given at the International Conference on East Asian Linguistics. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
2008The Source of the Bigrade Conjugation and Stem Shape in Pre-Old Japanese. Proto-Japanese ed. by Bjarke Frellesvig & John Whitman, 159–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2008Differential Subject Marking at Argument Structure, Syntax and PF. Differential Subject Marking ed. by Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart, 17–40. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2015Ergativity and Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 46:3. 489–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Masahiro
2000Shugo hyooji ga no seiryoku kakudai no yooso [The Expansion of the Use of the Subject Denotor ga: A Comparison Between the Original Text of the Tale of Heike and Amakusaban Heike]. Kokugogaku 51:1.1–14.Google Scholar
2010Kakujoshi ga noTsuujiteki Kenkyu [A Diachronic Study of the Case Particle ga ]. Hituzi: Tokyo.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yuko
2007Joodaigo no nookakusei ni tsuite [Ergativity in Old Japanese]. Nihongo no Shubun Genshoo [Main Clause Phenomena in Japanese] ed. by Nobuko Hasegawa, 147–188. Tokyo: Hituji Shobō.Google Scholar
2017Genitive/Active to Nominative Case in Japanese: The Role of Complex Experiencer Constructions. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics. The University of Texas at San Antonio.
2018Differential Subject Marking and Its Demise in the History of Japanese. Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking ed. by I. Seržant & A. Witzlack-Makarevich, 403–425. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
forthcoming]. Differential Argument Marking in Old Japanese: Morphology, Semantics, and Syntax. Handbook of Historical Japanese Linguistics ed. by Bjarke Frellesvig, Satoshi Kinsui & John Whitman Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Yanagida, Yuko & John Whitman
2009Alignment and Word Order in Old Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 181.101–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar