Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (2022) ► pp.194–240

Asyndetic complementation and referential integration in Spanish

A diachronic probabilistic grammar account

| KU Leuven
| KU Leuven
| FU Berlin
This paper examines a distinctive syntactic feature of (pre)classical Spanish: asyndetic complementation (without complementizer que ‘that’). While many authors regard this construction as a stylistic variant which eventually declined (i.a., Girón 2005), so far no exhaustive morphosyntactic study of the phenomenon has been presented, as previous works either have focused on only one predicate (Blas Arroyo & Porcar Miralles 2016, 2018) or do not contain detailed quantitative data (Pountain 2015). Using evidence from richly annotated corpus data spanning between 1400 and 1799 (GITHE 2015), we adopt the diachronic probabilistic grammar framework (Szmrecsanyi 2013) by means of multifactorial statistical models, to identify the language-internal probabilistic constraints that regulated the que/Ø alternation, and to explore whether their relevance changed diachronically. The results indicate that asyndetic complementation is promoted in the domain of manipulation verbs (e.g., requests and commands) and, more generally, by the semantic and syntactic integration of events (Givón 2001a). Diachronically we observe that some of the effects strengthened over time, suggesting a syntactic specialization process, which might have eventually led to the restricted and marked use of the asyndeton in Modern Spanish.
Keywords: diachronic probabilistic grammar, Spanish historical syntax, null, complementizer, asyndetic complementation, semantic integration, clause combination, referential integration
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Asyndetic complementation in historical Spanish: The state of the art
  • 3.Hypothesis
  • 4.Data and methodology
    • 4.1The data
    • 4.2An analytical approach to syntactic variation
  • 5.Predictor variables
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Asyndetic complementation in a diachronic perspective
    • 6.2Panchronic model
    • 6.3Diachronic model
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1The role of referential integration
    • 7.2The role of impersonal constructions
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 8 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20031.maz
References (63)
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic (Constructional Approaches to Language 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barraza Carbajal, Georgina. 2014. Oraciones subordinadas sustantivas de objeto directo. Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española (Lengua y estudios literarios), vol. 31, ed. by Concepción Company Company, 2971–3106. Mexico: UNAM Fondo de cultura económica.Google Scholar
Barton, Kamil. 2019. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.10.0. 11. [URL]
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1.1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benot, Eduardo. 1991 [1910]. El arte de hablar: gramática filosófica de la lengua castellana (reproducción facsímil) (Autores, Textos y Temas 4). Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis & Margarita Porcar Miralles. 2016. Un marcador sociolingüístico en la sintaxis del Siglo de Oro: patrones de variación y cambio lingüístico en completivas dependientes de predicados doxásticos. Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana 281.157–185.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Tiene tanto temor a la mar que creo no lo hará”: variación en la sintaxis de las completivas en los Siglos de Oro. Actas del X Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española: Zaragoza, 7–11 de septiembre de 2015, Vol. 11., ed. by María Luisa Arnal Purroy, Rosa María Castañer Martín, José María Enguita Utrilla, Vicente Lagüéns Gracia & María Antonia Martín Zorraquino, 531–548. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Google Scholar
Bravo García, Eva María. 1987. El español del siglo XVII en documentos americanistas (Alfar/Universidad 25). Sevilla: Ediciones Alfar.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2007. Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic? Experiments with the English Dative Alternation. Roots. Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base ed. by Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld, 75–96. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cooper, Nicholas. 2018. NCmisc: Miscellaneous Functions for Creating Adaptive Functions and Scripts. [URL]
Cornillie, Bert & Malte Rosemeyer. 2018. La elisión de la conjunción completiva que en V1 V2 entre 1400 y 1800. Presented at the XI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2005. Subordination (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert, Frauke D’hoedt & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2014. Variability in Verb Complementation in Late Modern English: Finite vs. Non-finite Patterns. Late Modern English Syntax ed. by Marianne Hundt, 182–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delbecque, Nicole & Béatrice Lamiroy. 1999. La subordinación sustantiva: las subordinadas enunciativas en los complementos verbales. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española ed. by I. Bosque & V. Demonte, 1965–2081. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Dowle, Matt & Arun Srinivasan. 2019. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame’. R package version 1.12.2. [URL]
Espinosa Elorza, Rosa María. 2014. Coordinación y Subordinación. Panorama general, relaciones diacrónicas básicas, y nexos. Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española (Lengua y estudios literarios), vol. 31, ed. by Concepción Company Company, 2231–2337. Mexico: UNAM Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Europa Press. 2019. Dirección de Mercedes-Benz dice no entender la huelga de Azuqueca y se muestra dispuesta a cerrar el convenio colectivo. [URL]. [URL] (11 January 2022).
Folgar Fariña, Carlos. 1997. ‘Decir’ + cláusula completiva objeto en español. Algunos aspectos de su diacronía. Moenia. Revista lucense de lingüística e literatura 31.377–410.Google Scholar
Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg. 2019. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications. [URL]
Gahl, Susanne & Susan M. Garnsey. 2006. Knowledge of Grammar Includes Knowledge of Syntactic Probabilities. Language 82:2.405–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Miguel, José M., Fita González Domínguez & Gael Vaamonde. 2010. ADESSE, a Database with Syntactic and Semantic Annotation of a Corpus of Spanish. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), 17–23 May, Valletta, Malta, ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Michael Rosner & Daniel Tapias, 1903–1910. Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Girón Alconchel, José Luis. 2005. Cambios gramaticales en los Siglos de Oro. Historia de la lengua española (Ariel lingüística), ed. by Rafael Cano, 859–893. 2nd ed. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
GITHE. 2015. Codea+ 2015. Corpus de documentos españoles anteriores a 1800. [URL] (10 December 2020).
Givón, T.. 2001a. Syntax: An Introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Syntax: An Introduction. Vol. 11. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Vergara, Carlos. 2012. El clítico ‘se’ en las oraciones no reflexivas del español. El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística: la gramática del papel y la referencia: introducción, avances y aplicaciones (Lingüística) ed. by Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Graciela Guerrero Valenzuela & Carlos González Vergara, 127–151. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas & Martin Hilpert. 2008. The Identification of Stages in Diachronic Data: Variability-Based Neighbour Clustering. Corpora 31.59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Modeling Diachronic Change in the Third Person Singular: A Multifactorial, Verb- and Author-specific Exploratory Approach. English Language and Linguistics 14:3.293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Variability-based Neighbor Clustering: A Bottom-up Approach to Periodization in Historical Linguistics. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English ed. by Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott, 134–144. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the Development of Language. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 1091, ed. by William Pagliuca, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halsey, Lewis G. 2019. The Reign of the p-value is Over: What Alternative Analyses Could We Employ to Fill the Power Vacuum? Biology Letters 15:5. 20190174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrell, Frank Jr. 2019. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.2-0. [URL]
Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, Francisco Javier. 2005. Sintaxis histórica de la oración compuesta en español (Biblioteca románica hispánica 2: Estudios y ensayos 440). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
. 2014. La conjunción que. La complejización del sistema de subordinación. Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española (Lengua y estudios literarios), vol. 31, ed. by Concepción Company Company, 2791–2970. Mexico: UNAM Fondo de cultura económica.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, David W. & Stanley Lemeshow. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2001. Der Grundwert des spanischen Subjunktivs. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jaccard, James. 2001. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keniston, Hayward M. 1937. Spanish Syntax List: A Statistical Study of Grammatical Usage in Contemporary Spanish Prose on the Basis of Range and Frequency. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change. Language Variation and Change 1:3.199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. (Language in Society 20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavale-Ortiz, Ruth M. 2013. Verbos denominales causativos en español actual. Universidad de Alicante PhD dissertation. [URL]
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 18) ed. by John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdecke, Daniel. 2018. sjPlot – Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. Iconicity and Generative Grammar. Language 68:4.756–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. Language Typology and Syntactic Description ed. by Timothy Shopen, 52–150. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Alvaro. 2011. Santa Teresa y la mano visible. Sobre las variantes sintácticas del Camino de perfección. Así se van las lenguas variando: nuevas tendencias en la investigacíon del cambio lingüistico en español (Fondo Hispánico de Lingüística y Filología 5) ed. by Mónica Castillo Lluch & Lola Pons Rodríguez, 241–304. Bern & New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Peterson, Brian & Peter Carl. 2020. PerformanceAnalytics: Econometric Tools for Performance and Risk Analysis. [URL]
Pons Rodríguez, Lola. 2008. Las construcciones imitativas del ‘accusativus cum infinitivo’: modelos latinos y consecuencias romances. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española 31.117–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pountain, Christopher. 2015. Que-deletion: The Rise and Fall of a Syntactic Fashion. En memoria de tanto miragre. Estudos dedicados ó profesor David Mackenzie ed. by Francisco Dubert García, Gabriel Rei-Doval & Xulio Sousa, 143–159. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española (eds.). 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Vol. 21. Madrid: Espasa Libros.Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2014. Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness, and Conservation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santiago Zaragoza, Antonio Cipriano & María José Santiago Puertas. 2011. Resúmenes de matemáticas aplicadas a las ciencias sociales I con notas históricas. Madrid: Editorial Visión Libros.Google Scholar
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets. 2016. The Diachronic Development of Zero Complementation: A Multifactorial Analysis of the That/Zero Alternation with Think, Suppose, and Believe . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1.31–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2020. Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology (Textbooks in Language Sciences). Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Diachronic Probabilistic Grammar. English Language and Linguistics 19:3.41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker. 2009. On the Persistence of Grammar in Discourse Formulas: A Variationist Study of that . Linguistics 47:1.1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., W. Labov & M. I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis (Use R!). 2nd ed. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley & Jennifer Bryan. 2009. readxl: Read Excel Files. R package version 1.3.1. [URL]
Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry & Kirill Müller. 2019. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.3. [URL]
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kiklewicz, Aleksander
2024. Asyndetic Complementation in the Light of Explicative Syntax (Exemplified with Bulgarian, Polish and Ukrainian). Slavia Meridionalis 23 DOI logo
Li, Yi, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Weiwei Zhang
2023. Beyond dynasties and binary alternations: a diachronic corpus study of four-way variability in Chinese theme-recipient constructions. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Mazzola, Giulia, Malte Rosemeyer & Bert Cornillie
2022. Syntactic alternations and socio-stylistic constraints: the case of asyndetic complementation in the history of Spanish. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.