Introduction published In:
Journal of Historical LinguisticsVol. 11:2 (2021) ► pp.209–213
Thematic section
Introduction to the special thematic section
Perspectives on alignment change
This article is available free of charge.
References (27)
Aldai, Gontzal. 2008. From
Ergative Case Marking to Semantic Case Marking: The Case of Historical
Basque. In Donohue & Wichmann (eds.) 2008, 197–218. 
Aldridge, Edith. 2011. Antipassive
in Austronesian Alignment Change. Grammatical Change. Origins, Nature,
Outcomes (2012) ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 332–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2015. A
Minimalist Approach to the Emergence of Ergativity in Austronesian Languages. Linguistics
Vanguard 1:1.313–326.
. 2016. Ergativity
from Subjunctive in Austronesian Languages. Language and
Linguistics 17:1.27–62.
. 2017. Intransitivity
and the Development of Ergative Alignment. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 501–529.
Butt, Miriam & Ashwini Deo. 2017. Developments
into and out of Ergativity: Indo-Aryan Diachrony. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 531–552.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coghill, Eleanor. 2016. The
Rise & Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic. Cycles of Alignment
Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coon, Jessica, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.). 2017. The
Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.). 2018.Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dahl, Eystein. 2016. The
Origin and Development of the Old Indo-Aryan Predicated -tá
Construction. In Dahl & Stroński (eds.) 2016a, 63–110.
(ed.). In
preparation. Alignment and Alignment Change in the Indo-European
Family.
Dahl, Eystein & Krzysztof Stroński (eds.). 2016a. Indo-Aryan
Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic
Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann (eds.). 2008. The
Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gildea, Spike. 1997. Evolution
of Grammatical Relations in Cariban: How Functional Motivation Precedes Syntactic
Change. Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective ed.
by Talmy Givón, 155–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zuñiga. 2016. Referential Hierarchies: A New Look at Some Historical and Typological Patterns. Linguistics 54:3.483–529.
Haig, Geoffrey. 2017. Deconstructing
Iranian Ergativity. In Coon, Massam & Travis (eds.) 2017, 465–500.
Harris, Alice C. 1985. Diachronic Syntax. The Kartvelian
Case. New York: Academic Press.
Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case
in Semitic. Roles, Relations, and
Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The
Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law, Danny. 2017. Changes
to Alignment in Mayan Languages So Far. Paper presented at
the ICHL 23 workshop, Alignment Typology in Diachronic
Perspective, 4 August 2017.
Lehman, Thomas. 1998. Old
Tamil. The Dravidian Languages ed. by Sanford B. Steever, 75–99. London: Routledge.
Polinski, Maria. 2016. Deconstructing
Ergativity. Two Types of Ergative Languages and Their
Features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seržant, Ilja & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.). 2018. The
Diachrony of Differential Argument
Marking. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Whitman, John & Yuko Yanagida. 2012. The
Formal Syntax of Alignment Change. Parameter Theory and Linguistic
Change ed. by Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar, 177–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zuñiga, Fernando. 2018. The Diachrony of Morphosyntactic Alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 121.1–21.