Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 14:1 (2024) ► pp.66–107
Thematic section

From oblique to core case in the Southern Min languages

The role of topic in the emergence of optional object marking in Sinitic

ORCID logo | Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale
This study sets out to discuss the evolution from oblique to core case as a manifestation of overtly-marked nominative-accusative alignment in Sinitic languages. This is due to the emergence of a type of ‘optional’ marking on preverbal direct objects in a construction type that has become widespread in Sinitic (Chappell & Verstraete 2019). In particular, I examine spoken discourse data from Taiwanese Southern Min whose comitative preposition, ka7 , has grammaticalized into an optional object marker. It is argued that this marker is undergoing morphologization into a direct object index (doi) on the main verb in the predicate, subsequent to the omission of the resumptive pronoun it governs. The new index takes over this function of cross-referencing the lexical direct object, typically located in the immediately preceding discourse, if not in clause-initial position.
In an epilogue, I also briefly treat the evolution of local cases such as the allative and the perlative to optional object markers in the Southern Min languages of Shantou and Jieyang, situated in Guangdong Province, China. Both of these are extremely rare sources in the Sinitic family, yet common in Tibeto-Burman and Romance languages. The approach adopted is in harmony with recent diachronic studies which target source morphosyntax in order to explain the emergence of a variety of synchronic patterns, all bearing similar discourse and grammatical functions (Cristofaro & Zúñiga 2018).
Keywords: optional object marking, Southern Min, Sinitic, case, topicalization, topic continuity, direct object index
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Parallel semantic shifts and shared grammaticalization in Southeast Asia
  • 3.Sinitic languages
    • 3.1Conditions of use on the object marking constructions
      • 3.1.1Animacy of direct object noun
      • 3.1.2Telicity of the predicate
      • 3.1.3Givenness of direct object noun
      • 3.1.4Topicality
  • 4.Sinitic comitatives, their grammaticalization pathways into object-marking constructions
    • 4.1Southern Min object marking constructions
      • 4.1.1Type I: Common OM construction
      • 4.1.2Type II: Clause-initial lexical object with a resumptive pronoun introduced by the object marker
      • 4.1.3Type III: Clause-initial lexical object indexed by a proclitic object marker
      • 4.1.4Type IV: Double-marked object marking construction
    • 4.2Diachronic change and the comitative
  • 5.OMs in Taiwanese Southern Min discourse
  • 6.Epilogue: Allatives and perlatives as a source of oms in Shantou Southern Min
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Romanization
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 16 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21038.cha
References (81)
References
Bisang, Walter. 1992. Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 2004. Case. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Zhiyun 曹志耘. 2008. Hanyu Fangyan Ditu Ji · Yufa Juan 汉语方言地图集·语法卷 [The Linguistic Atlas of Chinese Dialects. Vol. 3: Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1993. Prosodic and Functional Units of Language. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Research ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 33–43. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2000. Dialect Grammar in Two Early Modern Southern Min Texts: A Comparative Study of Dative kit, Comitative cang and Diminutive –guia . Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28:2.247–302.Google Scholar
. 2013. Pan-Sinitic Object Markers: Morphology and Syntax. Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond ed. By Cao Guangshun, H. Chappell, R. Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch, 785–816. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2015. Linguistic Areas in China for Differential Object Marking, Passive and Comparative Constructions. Diversity in Sinitic languages ed. by H. Chappell, 13–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary, Alain Peyraube & Yunji Wu. 2011. A Comitative Source for Object Markers in Sinitic languages: 跟 kai55 in Waxiang and 共 kang7 in Southern Min. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20:4.291–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2019. Optional Case Marking: Synchrony and Diachrony. Language and Linguistic Compass 13:3.1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana & Gwendolyn Hyslop (eds.). 2011–2012. Optional Case Marking in Tibeto-Burman. Special issue of Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, Vols. 34–351.Google Scholar
Chen, Weirong. 2020. A Grammar of the Hui’an Language of Southern Min. (= Sinitic Languages of China: Typological Descriptions, 3). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zeping. 2006. Fuzhou fangyan chuzhi jieci ‘gong’ de yufahua lujing [The Grammaticalization Pathway of the Disposal Preposition gong in the Fuzhou Dialect]. Zhongguo Yuwen 31.233–236.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhesheng 陈哲盛. 2020. Shantou Xi’nan Daxin-hua yanjiu 汕头溪南大新话研究 [Research on the Daxin Dialect of Xinan Town, Shantou City]. Master’s Thesis, Guangxi Normal University, China.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2013. The Referential Hierarchy: Reviewing the Evidence in Diachronic Perspective. Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska ed. by Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath, 69–93. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia & Fernando Zuñiga. 2018. Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Typological Hierarchies. Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony ed. by Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zuñiga, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dai, Qingxia 戴庆厦. 2012. Jingpo-yu cankao yufa 景颇语参考语法 [A Reference Grammar of Jingpho]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Delancey, Scott. 2011. Optional ‘Ergativity’ in Tibeto-Burman Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34:2.9–20.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, Jack, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of Discourse Transcription. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Research ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fielde, Adele Marion. 1878. First Lessons in the Swatow Dialect. Shantou: Swatow Printing Office Company.Google Scholar
. 1883. A Pronouncing and Defining Dictionary of the Swatow Dialect, Arranged According to Syllables and Tones. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, Pronoun and Grammatical Agreement. Subject and Topic ed. by Charles N. Li & Sandra A. Thompson, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross Language Study ed. by Talmy Givón, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. The Pragmatics of Referentiality. Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Approaches ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 120–138. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian Khmer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Virginia & Alexandru Mardale. 2019. Patterns for Differential Object Marking in the History of Romanian. Journal of Historical Syntax 31.1–47.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 ed. by Elisabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2010. Topicality and Differential Object Marking. Studies in Language 34:2.239–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. Doctoral Dissertation, Università degli studi di Pavia.
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Giorgio Francesco Arcodia. 2014. Differential Object Marking and Identifiability of the Referent: A Study of Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 52:2.315–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaisser, Annie, Martha Ratliff, Elizabeth Riddle, David Strecker, Lopao Vang & Lyfu Vang. 1995. Hmong for Beginners. Berkeley: Centers for South and Southeast Asia Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Jarkey, Nerida. 2015. Serial Verb Constructions in White Hmong. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenny, Mathias & San San Hnin Tun. 2016. Burmese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Henril Liljegren. 2017. Semantic Patterns from an Areal Perspective. The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics ed. by Raymond Hickey, 204–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2019. The Polysemous lia̍h 力 in Early Modern Southern Min and Its Contemporary Fate. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 47.11:193–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 1992. ‘Anti-Ergative’ Marking in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 15.11:1–9.Google Scholar
Lee, Huichi. 2009. ka ⇦ hoo Constructions in Taiwan Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 7:2.25–48.Google Scholar
Li, Lan 李蓝 & Cao, Xilei 曹茜蕾. 2013a. 汉语方言中的处置式和把字句 (上,) Hanyu fangyan-zhong de chuzhishi he ‘bă’ ziju (shang) [Disposal Constructions and bă Constructions in Chinese Dialects (Part I)]. Fangyan [Dialects] 11.11–30.Google Scholar
. 2013b. 汉语方言中的处置式和把字句 (下) Hanyu fangyan-zhong de chuzhishi he ‘bă’ ziju (xia) [Disposal Constructions and bă Constructions in Chinese Dialects (Part II)]. Fangyan [Dialects] 21.97–110.Google Scholar
Li, Rulong 李如龙. 1996. Quanzhou fangyan de dongci weiyuju 泉州方言的动词谓语句。 [Verbal Predicates in the Quanzhou Dialect] ed. by Li Rulong & Zhuang Chusheng Dongci weiyuju 动词谓语句 [Verbal predicates]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Publishers.Google Scholar
Lien, Chinfa. 2002. Grammatical Function Words 乞，度，共，甲，将 and 力 in Li4 Jing4 Ji4 荔镜记 and their Development in Southern Min. Papers from the Third International Conference on Sinology: Linguistic Section. Dialect Variations in Chinese ed. by Dah-an Ho, 179–216. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Preparatory Office, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Condition and Change of 共 vis-à-vis 合 in Southern Min with a Sidelight on Intra-Dialectal Variation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 43:1.1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Liantong 林连通. 1993. Quanzhou fangyanzhi 泉州方言志 [Quanzhou Dialect Gazetteer]. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lin, Philip T. 2015. Taiwanese Grammar: A Concise Reference. Greenhorn Media. Online: [URL]
Liu, Danqing 刘丹青. 2001. Wuyu de jufa leixing tedian 吴语的句法类型特点 [Typological Features of Wu Dialects]. Fangyan 41.332–343.Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing. 2004. Identical Topics: A More Characteristic Property of Topic Prominent Languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. 32:1.20–64.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-Hsi. 1997. An Aspectual Analysis of ba . Journal of East Asian Linguistics 61.51–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ziyu 刘子瑜. 2002. Zai tan Tang-Song chuzhishi de laiyuan 再谈唐宋处置式的来源 [More on the Origins of the Disposal Construction of the Tang-Song period]. Hanyushi lunwenji 汉语史论文集 ed. by Song Shaonian 宋绍年, 139–164. Wuhan: Wuhan Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1993. Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loss, Daniel P. 2017. A Comparison of Grammaticalization in Shan and Thai. Master’s Thesis, Payap University.
Lü, Shanshan 吕珊珊. To appear. Panshi fangyan-zhong fangzhiyi dongci de qubiexing binyu biaoji gongneng 磐石方言中放置义动词的区别性宾语标记功能—类型学框架下的个案研究 [On the Differential Object Marking Function of the Verb of Placement in Panshi: A Case Study in a Typological Perspective].
Ma, Chongqi 马重奇. 1994. Zhangzhou fangyang yanjiu 漳州方言研究 [Studies on the Zhangzhou Dialect]. Hong Kong: Zongheng Publishers.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 2013. Optionality in Grammar and Language Use. Linguistics 51.61:1147–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mardale, Alexandru. 2010. Eléments d’analyse du marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues romanes. Faits de Langues 35–36:2.1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. The Grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mei, Tzu-Lin. 1990. Tang-Song chuzhishi de laiyuan 唐宋处置式的来源 [The Origins of the Disposal Construction of the Tang-Song Period.] Zhongguo Yuwen 31.191–216.Google Scholar
Moeng, Sao Tern & Irving I. Glick. 1991. Shan for English Speakers. Wheaton: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar
Nakajima, Motoki 中嶋 幹起. 1977. Mĭnyǔ Dōng Shān dăo fāngyán jīchǔ yǔhuìjí 闽语东山岛方言基础语汇记　 [A Study of the Basic Vocabulary of the Min Dialect in the Tung Shan Island]. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Ngai, Sing Sing. 2021. A Grammar of Shaowu: A Sinitic Language of Northwestern Fujian. (= Sinitic Languages of China: Typological Descriptions, 5). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pensado, Carmen. 1985. La creación del objeto directo preposicional y la flexión de los pronombres personales en las lenguas románicas. Revue roumaine de linguistique 30:2.123–158.Google Scholar
Peng Daxingwang. 2022. Le dialecte de Cenchuan à Pingjiang: grammaire et position dans le continuum dialectal. Doctoral Dissertation, INALCO.
Robbeets, Martine & Hubert Cuyckens. 2013. Towards a Typology of Shared Grammaticalization. Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages ed. by Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1971. Autour de l’accusatif prèpositionnel dans les langues romanes: concordances et discordances. Revue roumaine de linguistique 351. 312–334.Google Scholar
Seifen, Karl. 2021. Object Marking in Tai Languages. Research seminar presentation, March 2021. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Shi, Qisheng 施其生. 1996. Shàntóu fāngyán de jǐzhǒng jùshì 汕头方言的几种句式 [Several Construction Types in the Shantou Dialect]. Fāngyán lùngǎo 方言论稿 [Essays on Dialects] ed. by Shi Qisheng, 152–162. Guǎngzhōu: Guǎngdōng Rénmín Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Shàntóu fāngyán de jiècí 汕头方言的介 [Prepositions in the Shantou Dialect]. Dongci weiyuju 动词谓语句 [Verbal Predicates] ed. by Li Rulong & Zhuang Chusheng, 157–172. Guangzhou: Jinan University Publishers.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2006. On Comitatives and Related Categories: A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tan, Adeline. 2020. L’expression du déplacement en Chaozhou: les formes introduisant un groupe nominal locatif et l’encodage de la trajectoire. Doctoral Dissertation, INALCO.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1987. A Topic-Comment Approach to the Ba Construction. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 15:1.1–54.Google Scholar
. 1991. On the Mechanisms and Constraints in Syntactic Change: Evidence from Chinese Dialects. International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics 21:370–388. Nankang: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu 曹逢辅. 2003. Taiwan minnan yu de ka7 zi ju 台湾闽南的ka7 字句 [The ka7 constructions in the Taiwan Southern Min dialects]. Hanyu fangyan yufa yanjiu he tansuo – shoujie guoji Hanyu fangyan yufa xueshu yantaohui lunwenji 汉语方言语法研究和探索 – 首届国际汉语方言语法学术研讨会论文集 [Research on Grammar of Chinese Dialects: Essay Collection of the First International Conference on the Grammar of Chinese], ed. by Zhaoming Dai 戴昭铭, 114–136. Harbin: Heilongjiang Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xu, Baohua 许宝华 & Huan, Tao 陶寰. 1999. Wuyu de chuzhishi 吴语的处置式 [Disposal Constructions in the Wu dialects]. Hanyu fangyan gongshi yu lishi yufa yantao lunwenji 汉语方言共时与历时语法研讨论文集 [Synchronic and Diachronic Studies on the Grammar of Chinese Dialects] ed. by Yunji Wu 伍云姬, 135–167. Guangzhou: Jinan Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xu, Huiling. 2007. Aspects of Chaozhou Grammar: A Synchronic Description of the Jieyang Variety. (=Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 22). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press & Berkeley, CA: Project on Linguistics and Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2006. Syntactic Structure of the ka-Construction in Taiwanese Southern Min. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 21.141–171.Google Scholar
Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan yuyan yanjiusuo 中国社会科学院语言研究所. [Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, (ed.)]. 2012. Zhongguo yuyan dituji 中国语言地图集 ([Language Atlas of China]). Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Zhou, Changji 周长楫. 1991. Minnanhua yu putonghua 闽南话与普通话 [The Southern Min Dialect and Standard Chinese]. Beijing: Yuwen Publishers.Google Scholar
Zhou, Chenlei. 2019. A Special Case Marking System in the Sinitic Languages of Northwest China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 47:2.425–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong. 2005. A Grammar of Shanghai Wu. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cristofaro, Sonia
2024. Diachronic pathways to case marking alignment and what they mean for the explanation of synchronic cross-linguistic patterns. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.