Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Old English perspectives on the complement shift

Toward the desententialisation of self-manipulative verbs

ORCID logo | Universidad de La Rioja
This article gathers a motivated inventory of Old English self-manipulative verbs, including Abstain verbs and Refrain verbs, analyses their semantics and syntax and offers diachronic perspectives on the replacement of that-clause complementation with the from + -ing construction. Such perspectives go in two directions. Firstly, the semantics of the that-clause remains intact throughout the change to the from + -ing construction. Secondly, deverbal nominalisations contribute to the semantics and syntax required by the gerund. The main conclusion is that Refrain verbs are exceptional because the competition leading to the Complement Shift does not hold between finite and non-finite clauses, but between finite clauses and deverbal nominalisations. This has two important consequences: the status of derived nominal linked predications must be acknowledged, and deverbal nominalisations must occupy the top of the syntactic ranking of clause linkage.
Keywords: complement shift, desententialisation, syntax, semantics, Old English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntax and semantics in the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy
  • 3.The interclausal relations hierarchy as a predictor of diachronic change
  • 4.Method, sources and data
  • 5.The semantics of self-manipulative verbs
  • 6.The syntax of self-manipulative verbs Abstain and Refrain
    • 6.1 Abstain verbs
    • 6.2 Refrain verbs
  • 7.Results of analysis and diachronic perspectives
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22009.oja
References (54)
References
Bosworth, Joseph & Thomas N. Toller. 1973. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, Morgan. 1913. The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington: The Carnegie Institution of Washington. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark Hall, John R. 1996. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Collin’s Dictionary Online. 2022. Available from: [URL] [Accessed December 4, 2022].
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford Studies in the History of English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2006. Complement Clauses and Complementation Strategies in Typological Perspective. Complementation. A Cross-Linguistic Typology ed. by R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela & Ricardo Mairal. 1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 1996. The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject-Control Verbs in English. Diachronica 13:1.29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. The Cambridge History of the English Language II. 1066–1476 ed. By N. Blake, 207–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William & Robert D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The Binding Hierarchy and the Typology of Complements. Studies in Language 41: 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction: Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1994. Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code. Iconocity in Language ed. by Rafaele Simone, 47–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and Economic Motivation. Language 59:4.781–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Iconicity in Linguistics. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences ed. by James D. Wright, 512–515. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey, Antonette diPaolo (ed.). 2018. The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-I. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Healey, Antonette diPaolo, J. Price Wilkin & Xi Xiang (eds.). 2004. The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lacalle Palacios, Miguel 2021. Old English Verbs of Depriving: The Semantics and Syntax of Possession Transfer. Studia Neophilologica 94:1.1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Old English Verbs of Increasing: The Semantics and Syntax of Change in Size. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 161.123–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse ed. by John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Anatoly. 2008. Analytic Dictionary of English Etymology. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, Javier. 2018. The Semantic Poles of Old English: Toward the 3D Representation of Complex Polysemy. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33:1.96–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. Old English Rejoice Verbs: Derivation, Grammatical Behaviour and Class Membership. Poetica 931.133–153.Google Scholar
Martin Arista, Javier. 2020b. Further Remarks on the Deflexion and Grammaticalisation of the Old English Past Participle with habban . International Journal of English Studies 20:1.51–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, Javier. 2021. Word Alignment in a Parallel Corpus of Old English Prose: From Asymmetry to Inter-Syntactic Annotation. Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age: Recent Advances and Explorations ed. by Julia Lavid-López, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 76–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. The Syntax and Semantics of the Old English Predicative Construction. Language Change and Linguistic Theory in the 21st Century ed. by Nikolaos Lavidas & Kiki Nikiforidou, 102–132. Amsterdam: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Arista, Javier & Ana Elvira Ojanguren López. 2018. Grammaticalisation and Deflexion in Progress: The Past Participle in the Old English Passive. Studia Neophilologica 90:2.155–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojanguren López, Ana Elvira. 2020. The Semantics and Syntax of Old English End Verbs. Atlantis 42:1.163–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Jane, Christian Kay & Lynne Grundy. 2000. A Thesaurus of Old English. 21 Vols. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter 1995. On the Replacement of Finite Complement Clauses by Infinitives in English. English Studies 761.367–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The Role of Functional Constraints in the Evolution of the English Complementation System. Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000 ed. by Christine Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nicholas Ritt & Herbert Schendl, 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. 2020. Corpora and Complementation: Tracing Sentential Complementation Patterns of Nouns, Adjectives and Verbs over the Last Three Centuries. New York: The Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity. Grammatical Categories in Australian languages ed. by R. M. W. Dixon, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Languages.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1976. The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. York: University of York, Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2007. The Role and Reference Grammar Analysis of Three-Place Predicates. Suvremena Lingvistika 631.31–63.Google Scholar
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Some Questions Concerning Accomplishments. Lecture delivered at the International Symposium on Verbs, Clauses and Constructions, held at the Universidad de La Rioja.
2021. Cosubordination. Challenges at the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface: A Role and Reference Grammar Perspective ed. by Robert D. Van Valin, 241–256. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
n.d.b. An Overview of Role and Reference Grammar: Role and Reference Grammar. Accessed 21 Jan. 2022. Available online: [URL]
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vea Escarza, Raquel. 2021. Old English Verbs of ‘Envy’: Class Membership and Grammatical Behaviour. Studies in the History of the English Language VIII: Boundaries and Boundary-Crossings in the History of English ed. by Peter J. Grund & Megan E. Hartman 187–208. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Visser, F. Th. 1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language: Part Three: First Half. Syntactical Units with Two Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Yamakawa, Kikuo. 1957. The Two Constructions: “Accusative and Participle” and “Genitive and Gerund”: A Diachronic-Synchronic Study in English Syntax. The Annals of the Hitotsubashi Academy 8:1.44–100.Google Scholar