Article published In:
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Vol. 14:2 (2024) ► pp.304334
References

Corpora and dictionaries

BFM2019 = École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS) (ed.)
2019Base de français médiéval 2019. Lyon: École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS). Online: [URL]
BIBIT = Quondam, Amedeo et al.
(eds.) 2016–2023Biblioteca italiana. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Online: [URL]
CDH = Real Academia Española (ed.)
2013–2023Corpus del Nuevo diccionario histórico del español. Madrid: Real Academia Española. Online: [URL]
Frantext = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.)
1998–2023 Base textuelle Frantext. Nancy: Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF). Online: [URL]
LIZ = Stoppelli, Pasquale & Eugenio Picchi
(eds.) 2001Letteratura italiana Zanichelli. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
TLFi = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.)
2013–2023 Trésor de la langue française informatisé. Nancy: Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF). Online: [URL]
TLIO = Opera del vocabolario italiano (ed.)
2005–2023Corpus del Tesoro della lingua italiana delle origini. Firenze: Opera del vocabolario italiano. Online: [URL]
Andersen, Henning
2001Actualization and the (Uni)directionality of Change. Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress ed. by Henning Andersen, 226–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthonissen, Lynn
2021Individuality in Language Change. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea
2015Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications. Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 2–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
2008Introduction: Constructions and Language Change. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2008Constructional Idioms as Products of Linguistic Change: The aan het + INFINITIVE Construction in Dutch. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 81–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersi, Nigel Vincent & George Walkden
2015On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change. Transactions of the Philological Society 1131.362–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buridant, Claude
2019Grammaire du français médiéval (XIe-XIVe siècles). Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Horward Lasnik
1993The Theory of Principles and Parameters. Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 1. Halbband / Vol. 1 ed. by Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann, 506–569. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Combettes, Bernard
2014Réanalyse et changement linguistique. Langages 1961.53–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
(eds.) 2018Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
2017Ambiguity and Vagueness in Historical Change. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives ed. by Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger, 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2009Analysing Reanalysis. Lingua 1191.1728–1755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The Course of Actualization. Language 881.601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2015Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak, 296–322. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Context Types in Grammaticalization as Constructions. Constructions SV 1. Online: [URL]
2009Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 371.445–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
2021Grammaticalization of verdienen into an Auxiliary Marker of Deontic Modality: An Item-Driven Usage-Based Approach. Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Martin Hilpert, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere, 81–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, Regine
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
2000In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language 76:3.546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2017 Quapropter, quaeso? ‘Why, for Pity’s Sake?’ Questions and the Pragmatic Functions of quaeso, obsecro, and amabo in Plautus. Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek ed. by Camille Denizot & Olga Spevak, 83–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor
1988Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone . Language 641.501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flach, Susanne
2020Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox: The Emergence of the into-Causative. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova, 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2008Constructions and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and Attribution. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L. & Arnold M. Zwicky
1971On Invited Inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 21.561–566.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2014Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. QUAESO and It. prego): The Cyclic Nature of Functional Developments. Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages ed. by Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nicolas & Amanda Patten
2011Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. Speech Acts ed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gras Manzano, Pedro
2010Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.
Györi, Gábor
1995Historical Aspects of Categorization. Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 175–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
2018aCyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance. Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change ed. by Salvador Pons Bordería & Óscar Loureda Lamas, 51–77. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2018bThe Expression of Clause Negation: From Latin to Early French. Latin tardif, français ancien. Continuités et ruptures ed. by Anne Carlier & Céline Guillot-Barbance, 269–297. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar ed. by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal? What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1961 [1943]Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. [Translation of Omkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. København: Munksgaard.]Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann B. & Anton Szantyr
1965Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting, February 14–16, 1987: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition ed. by Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip, 139–157. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991On some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin
2018Baseline Elaboration and Echo-Sounding at the Adjective Adverb Interface. Cognitive Linguistics 291.407–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996The Way Constructions Grow. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language ed. by Adele E. Goldberg, 217–230. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Høst og Søn.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Emanuel
2018A Radical Construction Grammar Approach to Construction Split in the Diachrony of Spatial Particles of Ancient Greek. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar ed. by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson, 277–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore
1999Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction. Language 75:1.1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1977Syntactic Reanalysis. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean & Étienne Wenger
1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legallois, Dominique
2018La notion de construction. Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. ed. by Denis Apothéloz, Marie-José Béguelin, Christophe Benzitoun, Alain Berrendonner, Gilles Corminboeuf, Jeanne-Marie Debaisieux, José Deulofeu, Peter Lauwers & Dominique Willems. Online : [URL]
Lehmann, Christian
1982Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. Vol. 1. Köln: Universität Köln.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization. Language 671: 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2016Grammatica delle costruzioni. Un’introduzione. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
Meillet, Antoine
1912L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia: rivista internazionale di sintesi scientifica 121.384–400.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
2019Verb-Based Functional Markers in Latin: Morphosyntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics at a Crossroads. Rivista italiana di linguistica e di dialettologia 211.49–66.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
2021Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
2003Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language 79:4.682–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
2011Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 401–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory. Functions of Language 141.177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persson, Gunnar
1988Homonymy, Polysemy and Heterosemy: The Types of Lexical Ambiguity in English. Symposium on Lexicography III: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Lexicography May 14–16, 1986 at the University of Copenhagen ed. by Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen & Arne Zettersten, 269–280. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2019How Constructions are Born: The role of Patterns in the Constructionalization of be going to INF. Patterns in Language and Linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept ed. by Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke, 157–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1988 [1984]Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: UTB Francke. [Translation of Latijnse Syntaxis en Semantiek. Amsterdam: Grüner.]Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele, Pierluigi Cuzzolin, Nicola Grandi & Maria Napoli
2021Orizzonti della linguistica. Grammatica, tipologia, mutamento. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Rheinfelder, Hans
1952Altfranzösische Grammatik. 1. Teil. Lautlehre. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
1967Altfranzösische Grammatik. 2. Teil. Formenlehre. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
2010Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification: The Contribution of Particles. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 1. Syntax of the Sentence ed. by Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 317–441. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1995 [1916]Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Charles Bailly et Albert Séchehaye avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. Édition critique préparée par Tullio De Mauro. Postface de Louis-Jean Calvet. Paris: Payot & Rivages.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2010Does Frequency in Text Instantiate Entrenchment in the Cognitive System? Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches ed. by Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer, 101–133. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2018Verbos cognitivos en el Corpus del Nuevo diccionario histórico (CDH). RILCE. Revista de filología hispánica 34:3.1081–1103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 J’imagine comme verbe et marqueur pragmatique : une analyse diachronique. 7e Congrès mondial de linguistique française, Université de Montpellier 3, France, 6–10 juillet 2020 ed. by Franck Neveu, Bernard Harmegnies, Linda Hriba, Sophie Prévost & Agnès Steuckardt. Online: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022Dal verbo immaginare al segnale discorsivo immagino. Estensione, rianalisi e adattamento. Storie e linguaggi 8:1.225–248.Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan & Julie Glikman
2015Origin and Development of French Parenthetical Verbs. Parenthetical Verbs ed. by Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi, 163–188. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2015Constructionalization and Constructional Change: The Role of Context in the Development of Constructions. Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
2020Introduction: The Nature of the Node and the Network: Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar ed. by Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefenelli, Arnulf
1996Thesen zur Entstehung und Ausgliederung der romanischen Sprachen. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (LRL). Band II.1: Latein und Romanisch: historisch-vergleichende Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 73–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1977Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Constructions in Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. Constructions and Language Change ed. by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 23–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varvaro, Alberto
2013Latin and the Making of the Romance Languages. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Volume 2: Contexts ed. by Martin Maiden, John Ch. Smith & Adam Ledgeway, 6–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2017The Actuation Problem. The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax ed. by Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts, 403–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Walter Bisang
2004What Makes Grammaticalization? An Appraisal of its Components and its Fringes. What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer, 3–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar