Cover not available
Article published In:
The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers
Edited by Silvio Cruschina and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1/2] 2017
► pp. 111–133

From visual perception to inference in the French evidential markers il m’est avis que, apparemment, and il paraît que

| Universidad Complutense de Madrid
This article studies the evolution, from Medieval to Modern French, of three evidential markers that are semantically related from a diachronic perspective: il m’est avis que ‘I think that’, ‘it seems to me that’, apparemment ‘apparently’, and il paraît que ‘it seems that, apparently’. This study demonstrates the rise of the modal and evidential uses of the markers in question, from the Medieval period onwards, and provides a semantic characterization of these three epistemic-evidential markers in order to precisely grasp the evolution of their meaning. Using information from a number of databases, this article provides empirical support for the study of the different types of evidentiality, their evolution, and their interaction with the epistemic commitment of the speaker and the degree of certainty. The three markers have evolved towards greater subjectivity and a lower degree of certainty. Their historical semantic description shows that a marker may shift diachronically between various types of evidence.
Keywords: evidentiality, French, historical pragmatics, visual perception, inference, epistemic modality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The evolution of il m’est avis que
  • 3.The origins of the evidential inferential marker apparemment
  • 4.The evolution of il paraît que
  • 5.The parentheticals à ce qu’il paraît, il paraît, comme il paraît, and paraît- il
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Databases and dictionaries
  • Primary sources
  • References
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.05rod
References (55)
Databases and dictionaries
Corpus de la littérature médiévale en langue d’oïl des origines à la fin du XVe siècle, Paris, Champion électronique, 2001.Google Scholar
Textes de français ancien (TFA), Laboratoire de Français Ancien, The ARTLF Project. University of Ottawa.
Frantext, ATILF – CNRS/Université de Nancy 2. Available online at [URL].
Primary sources
Alexandre de Paris. 1937. The Medieval French Roman d’Alexandre ed. by Edward C. Armstrong & Douglas L. Buffum, Vol. 21. Princeton: Elliott Monographs.Google Scholar
Becque, Henri. 1922. Les Corbeaux, in Théâtre complet, Vol. 21. Paris: Fasquelle.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean. 1957. Institution de la religion chrestienne ed. by J. D. Benoit. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Capitaine Gervais. 2009. Souvenirs d’un soldat de l’empire. A la conquête de l’Europe. Paris: Bernard Giovanangeli.Google Scholar
Comte de Volney. 1787. Voyage en Égypte et en Syrie. Paris: Volland.Google Scholar
Corrozet, Gilles. 1992. Second livre des fables d’Esope ed. by Paola Cifarelli. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
Daudet, Alphonse. 1890. La Lutte pour la vie. Paris: Librairie de France.Google Scholar
Dufresny, Charles. 1857. La Coquette de village ou le Lot supposé. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Esprit, Jacques. 1710. La Fausseté des vertus humaines. Amsterdam: P. Mortier.Google Scholar
Faulkner, William, 1935. Lumière d’août translated by Maurice-Edgar Coindreau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Froissart, Jean. 1972. Chroniques ed. by George T. Diller. Paris: Droz-Minard.Google Scholar
Juvénal des Ursins, Jean. 1978. Ecrits politiques. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lavardin, Jacques de. 1974. La Célestine ed. by Denis L. Drysdale. London: Tamesis Books.Google Scholar
Lesage, Alain-René. 1821. Aventures du chevalier de Beauchêne. Paris: Renouard.Google Scholar
Marivaux. 1968. Le Prince travesti, ou l’Illustre aventurier, in Théâtre complet ed. by Frédéric Deloffre, Vol. 11. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Mme de Sévigné. 1974. Correspondance, Vol. 21. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Montesquieu. 1914. Correspondance 1716–1755 ed. by François Gebelin & André Morize. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Musset, Alfred de. 1923. La Coupe et les lèvres, in Oeuvres complètes ed. by Fernand Baldensperger & Robert Doré, Vol. 11. Paris: Conard.Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston & Ulysse Robert, eds. 1876–1897. Miracles de Nostre Dame par personnages, 71 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Ponson du Terrail, Pierre-Alexis. 1963. Rocambole. Les drames de Paris ed. by C. A. Ciccione, Vol. 11. Monaco: Eds du Rocher.Google Scholar
Renaud de Beaujeu. 2003. Le bel inconnu ed. by Michèle Perret & Isabelle Weill. Paris: Champion classiques.Google Scholar
Roques, M., ed. 1952. Erec et Enide. Paris: Champion CFMA.Google Scholar
Sand, George. 1981. François le Champi. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
. 1987. Correspondance 1830 ed. by Georges Lubin. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Scarron, Paul. 1995. Le Gardien de soy-mesme. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Scribe, Eugène. 1845. Le Mariage de raison, in Oeuvres complètes Vol. 41. Paris: Furne.Google Scholar
Sergent Bourgogne. 1995. Mémoires. Paris: Arléa.Google Scholar
Toussaint, Jean-Philippe. 1985. La salle de bain. Paris: Eds de Minuit.Google Scholar
Tyard, Pontus de. 1990. Mantice: discours de la vérité de Divination par Astrologie ed. by Sylviane Bokdam. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Voyage de La Pérouse autour du monde. 1797. Paris: Impr. de la République.Google Scholar
References
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology ed. by Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. The Continuum Between Lexical and Grammatical Evidentiality: A functional analysis of Spanish parecer . Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.109–128.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert & Paola Pietrandrea. 2012. Modality at Work: Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics 441.2109–2115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick. 1994. Devoir épistémique, marqueur modal ou évidentiel?. Langue Française 1021.24–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Liliana Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33:3.339–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Julie van Bogaert. 2007. A Semantic Description of French Lexical Evidential Markers and the Classification of Evidentials. Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.65–89.Google Scholar
González Ramos, Elisa. 2005. Por lo visto y al parecer: Comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicos de evidencialidad en español actual. Interlingüística 161.541–554.Google Scholar
Grossman, Francis & Agnès Tutin. 2010. Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: The case of the French verb voir . Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages ed. by Elena Smirnova & Gabriele Diewald, 279–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hanson, Kristin. 1987. On Subjectivity and the History of Epistemic Expressions in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 23:1.133–147.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nølke, Henning. 2001. La dilution linguistique des responsabilités. Essai de description polyphonique des marqueurs évidentiels il semble que et il paraît que . Le regard du locuteur 21, 15–34. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33:3.383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Notions of (Inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 51.53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola. 2007. The Grammatical Nature of Some Epistemic-Evidential Adverbs in Spoken Italian. Rivista di Linguistica 19:1.39–64.Google Scholar
Rey, Alain. 2004 [1992]. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Somolinos, Amalia. 2010. L’évolution de apparemment en français: la formation d’un marqueur d’attitude énonciative. Le changement en français. Etudes de linguistique diachronique ed. by Bernard Combettes Céline Guillot, Alexei Lavrentiev, Evelyne Oppermann-Marsaux, & Sophie Prévost, 345–361. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2014. L’évolution en français de il m’est avis que/ ce m’est avis: médiativité, perception, inférence. Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2014, 1–12. Institut de Linguistique Française/EDP Sciences, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
. 2016. Perception visuelle, inférence et polyphonie: l’évolution de il paraît que . Linx 73:2.17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2004. Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance. Lingua 1141.873–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1991. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 571.33–65.Google Scholar
Willems, Dominique. & Claire Blanche-Benveniste. 2010. Verbes ‛faibles’ et verbes à valeur épistémique en français parlé: il me semble, il paraît, j’ai l’impression, on dirait, je dirais. Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romane Vol. IV1 ed. by Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, & Paul Danler, 565–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Drolma, Dawa & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2024. The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 723 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.