Cover not available
Article published In:
Historical (socio)pragmatics at present
Edited by Matylda Włodarczyk and Irma Taavitsainen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:2] 2017
► pp. 295–314

“Now to my distress”

Shame discourse in eighteenth-century English letters

 | University of Helsinki
It is argued that shame has become increasingly important as a mechanism of social control in Western societies while our awareness of shame has simultaneously decreased. This paper explores the functions of the lexemes shame, disgrace and ignominy in the eighteenth-century section of the Corpus of Early English Correspondence and investigates how shame-inducing situations were discussed in letter-writing. Direct expressions of shame emerge particularly as formulaic apologies and reflect breached social conventions, honour, inadequacy and immorality. Shame discourse in the two case studies, however, proved to be context-dependent, evasive and euphemistic, and shame was expressed through a range of negative emotions. An element of discomfort in eighteenth-century shame discourse indicates that shame had taboo connotations, but the formulaic presence of shame and its connection to the cultural keyword of honour underlines its role as a mechanism of social control.
Keywords: corpus linguistics, emotion discourse, face, historical semantics, historical sociopragmatics, Late Modern English, politeness, shame, taboo
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods and material
  • 3.Shame discourse in the ceece: corpus analysis
  • 4.Shameful situations discussed: theft, expulsion and secret families
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00007.sai
References (23)
References
Backscheider, Paula R. 2013. Elizabeth Singer Rowe and the Development of the English Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Joanne. 2012. Parenting in England 1760–1830: Emotion, Identity and Generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker-Benfield, G. J. 1992. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeGategno, Paul J. and R. Jay Stubblefield. 2009. Jonathan Swift: A Literary Reference to His Life and Works. New York: Infobase Publishing.Google Scholar
Deonna, Julien A., Raffaele Rodogno and Fabrice Teroni. 2012. In Defense of Shame: The Faces of an Emotion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1978. The History of Manners: The Civilizing Process. (Volume I1.) New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Evans, Dylan. 2001. Emotion: The Science of Sentiment. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2011. “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 178–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Helen Block. 1971. Shame and Guilt in Neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Li, Jin. 2004. “The Organization of Chinese Shame Concepts”. Cognition and Emotion 18 (6): 767–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norberg, Cathrine. 2012. “Male and Female Shame: A Corpus-based Study of Emotion”. Corpora 7 (2): 159–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norgate, G. and G. Le. 2004. Morris, Matthew Robinson, second Baron Rokeby (1713–1800), rev. S. J. Skedd. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. Accessed 22 October 2014 at: [URL]. DOI logo
Ogarkova, Anna. 2007. “‘Green-eyed Monsters’: A Corpus-based Study of Metaphoric Conceptualizations of jealousy and envy in Modern English”. metaphorik.de 131: 87–147.Google Scholar
Retzinger, Suzanne. 1987. “Resentment and Laughter: Video Studies of the Shame – Rage Spiral”. In Helen Block Lewis (ed.), The Role of Shame in Symptom Formation, 151–81. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1991. Violent Emotions: Shame and Rage in Marital Quarrels. Newbury Park: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. 1994. Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion and Social Structure. (Second edition.) Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Shame in Self and Society”. Symbolic Interaction 26 (2): 239–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. and Suzanne Retzinger. 2000. “Shame as the Master Emotion of Everyday Life”. Journal of Mundane Behaviour 1 (3): 303–24.Google Scholar
Tissari, Heli. 2006. “Conceptualizing Shame: Investigating Uses of the English Word Shame, 1418–1991”. In McConchie, R. W. et al. (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX). Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Emotional Universals”. Language Design 21: 23–69.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker
2021. Historical Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 687 ff. DOI logo
Nevala, Minna & Anni Sairio
2017. Discord in eighteenth-century genteel correspondence. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.