Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogues in Diachrony: Celebrating Historical Corpora of Speech-related Texts
Edited by Merja Kytö and Terry Walker
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2] 2018
► pp. 167–185

Lexical bundles from one century to the next

An analysis of language input in English teaching texts

| Mid-Sweden University

This corpus study compares lexical bundles found in the language input of a selection of historical and current English language teaching materials to see what insights they can give into changes in spoken language use. English teaching texts published between 1905 and 1917 were used to construct a historical corpus, and a collection of English language self-study texts published between 2004 and 2014 were used for comparison. Both groups of texts focused on spoken language. The most frequent three-word lexical bundles extracted from each corpus varied considerably. The contemporary texts showed both a greater use of formulaic language and more syntactic complexity within it, while the historical texts relied on simpler structures. An exploratory analysis of the lexical bundles in the historical texts suggests, however, that viewed in conjunction with other historical sources, they can assist in building a picture of spoken language use of the period.

Keywords: corpus, English teaching texts, lexical bundles, spoken English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.English language teaching past and present
  • 3.Formulaic language and lexical bundles
  • 4.Corpora
    • 4.1Historical teaching texts
    • 4.2Contemporary self-study texts
    • 4.3Limitations of the corpora
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1A frequency survey
    • 6.2What do you
    • 6.3Do you like
    • 6.4Question frames and prefaces
    • 6.5Modal auxiliary use
  • 7.Summary and conclusion
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00017.all
References

Sources

Corpus of Historical Textbooks (HIST)

Austin, Ruth
1913 Lessons in English for Foreign Women: For Use in Settlements and Evening Schools. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Berlitz, Maximilian Delphinus
1917 Method for Teaching Foreign Languages. New York: M. D. Berlitz.Google Scholar
Darling, Alice I.
1914 Foreigners’ Guide to English. Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Houghton, Frederick
1911 First Lessons in English for Foreigners in Evening Schools. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Jimperieff, Mary
1915 Progressive Lessons in English for Foreigners: First Year. Boston: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sara Redempta
1909 English for Foreigners. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Tenney, C. D.
1905 English Lessons. London: Macmillan and Co. Limited.Google Scholar
Thorley, Wilfrid Charles
1916 A Primer of English for Foreign Students. London: Macmillan and Co. Limited.Google Scholar
Wallach, Isabel Richman
1906 A First Book in English for Foreigners. New York, Boston, Chicago: Silver, Burdett and Company.Google Scholar

Corpus of Self-Study Texts (SEST)

King, Gareth
2004 Colloquial English: A Course for Non-Native Speakers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Living Language
2009 English: Essential Course. New York: Living Language.Google Scholar
Pelteret, Cheryl
2012 Speaking: B1+ [Collins English for Life: Skills]. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Stevens, Sandra
2014 Complete English as a Foreign Language. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Woodford, Kate and Elizabeth Walter
2011 Easy Learning English Conversation. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Algeo, John
2006 British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rachel
2017 “From do you know to I don’t know: An Analysis of the Frequency and Usefulness of Lexical Bundles in Five English Language Self-Study Books”. Corpus Pragmatics 11: 351–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence
2016 “AntConc. A Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for Concordancing and Text Analysis”. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Bayley, Susan N.
1998 “The Direct Method and Modern Language Teaching in England 1880–1918”. History of Education 27 (1): 39–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006 University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, M. P.
1996 “History of Teaching English”. The English Journal 85 (8): 40–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760
2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö. (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2006 “Emotion Verbs with to-Infinitive Complements: From Specific to General Predication”. In Maurizio Giotti, Marina Dossena and Richard Dury (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2006: Syntax and Morphology, 223–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt and Beatrice Warren
2000 “The Idiom Principle and the Open Choice Principle”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 20 (1): 29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2007 “Drift and the Development of Sentential Complements in British and American English from 1700 to the Present Day”. In Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso and Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds), ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’: New Insights into Late Modern English, 161–235. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry W.
1908 The King’s English. (Second edition.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1926 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. and Richard Smith
2014 “The History of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, from a British and European Perspective”. Language and History 57 (1): 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2009 “Colonial Lag, Colonial Innovation or Simply Language Change?” In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter (eds), One Language, Two Grammars?: Differences between British and American English, 13–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1904 How to Teach a Foreign Language. London: Swan Sonnenschein / Allen & Unwin. [Translation by S. Yhlen-Olsen Bertelsen of Sprogundervisning 1901, Copenhagen: Schuboteske Forlag.]Google Scholar
Mair, Christian and Geoffrey Leech
2008 “Current Changes in English Syntax”. In Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds), The Handbook of English Linguistics, 318–342. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Masuhara, Hitomi, Naeema Hann, Yong Yi and Brian Tomlinson
2008 “Adult EFL Courses”. ELT Journal 62 (3): 294–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, Jeanne McCarten and Helen Sandiford
2014 Touchstone. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Michael McCarthy and Ronald Carter
2007 From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günther and Julia Schlüter
(eds) 2009 One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna and Ron Martinez
2014 “The Idiom Principle Revisited”. Applied Linguistics 2014: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1890 A Primer in Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Brian and Hitomi Masuhara
2013 “Adult Coursebooks”. ELT Journal 67 (2): 233–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2009 “Non-Finite Complements”. In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter (eds), One Language, Two Grammars?: Differences between British and American English, 212–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison
2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Guo, Jingshuai
2024. Analysis of English Classroom Teaching Evaluation in Colleges and Universities Based on the Hierarchical Analysis Method. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Ke, Xinli, Siyi Chen & Jian Wang
2024. Research on the construction of ecological mechanism and sustainable development of university English teaching based on multi-objective planning. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Li, Hua
2023. 2023 International Conference on Electronics and Devices, Computational Science (ICEDCS), ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yuli
2024. Exploring the Reform and Innovation of College English Teaching Based on the Knowledge Diffusion Model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Wang, Xin & Rahim Khan
2022. Research on Open Oral English Scoring System Based on Neural Network. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Yiqun
2024. The Application of Big Data Technology in English Teaching Mode Innovation and Effect Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Zhou, Lili
2024. Design and Innovative Methods of English Teaching Tutorials in the Context of the Information Age. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.