Article published In:
The Role of Pragmatics in Cyclic Language Change
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2] 2020
► pp. 263288
References (49)
References
Armstrong, Nigel. 2001. Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Authier, Jean-Marc. 1993. “Nonquantificational Wh and Weakest Crossover”. Linguistic Inquiry 24 (1): 161–168.Google Scholar
Bailey, Laura. 2013. “Question Particles: Thai, Japanese and English”. Linguistica Atlantica 321: 34–51.Google Scholar
Ball, Rodney. 2000. Colloquial French Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Behnstedt, Peter. 1973. Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens?. Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen [‘Do You Come? Forms and Structures of the French Direct Interrogative’]. Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar
Bencini, Giulia. 2003. “Toward a Diachronic Typology of Yes/no Question Constructions with Particles”. Chicago Linguistic Society 391: 604–621.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty. 2006. “Semantic and Pragmatic Contributions to Information Status”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38 (1): 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Paul. 2010. “L’interrogation partielle en français: l’interface syntaxe / sémantique” [“Wh-questions in French: The Syntax–Semantics Interface”]. Syntaxe et sémantique 111: 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ariel. 2007. “Incredulity Questions”. In Ron Artstein and Laure Vieu (eds), Decalog 2007: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, 133–140. 30 May to 1 June 2007. Rovereto, Italy.Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Bristol: Elm Bank.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. “Typology of Sentence Negation”. Linguistics 17 (1–2): 79–106.Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich. 2003. “La grammaticalisation des constructions de négation dans une perspective onomasiologique, ou: la déconstruction d’une illusion d’optique” [“Grammaticalisation of Negation Constructions in an Onomasiological Perspective, or: The Deconstruction of an Optical Illusion”]. In Peter Koch and Andreas Blank (eds), Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie [‘Cognitive Romance Onomasiology and Semasiology’], 213–233. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Strong Pronouns in Modern Spoken French: Cliticization, Constructionalization, Grammaticalization?”. Linguistics 56 (5): 1059–1098. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit. 2002. “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis. A Semantic–Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21 (2): 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Syntactic Change From Within and From Without Syntax: A Usage-based Analysis”. In Ulrich Detges and Richard Waltereit (eds), The Paradox of Grammatical Change: Perspectives from Romance, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2001. “Focus and Phrasing in French”. In Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth. 2006. “Information Packaging in Questions”. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 61: 93–111.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie B. 2007. “The Emergence of Emphatic ne in Conversational Swiss French”. Journal of French Language Studies 17 (3): 249–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1921. “Comment ont évolué les formes de l’interrogation” [“How Interrogative Forms Have Developed”]. Romania 471: 243–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. “Cyclical Change: An Introduction”. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greive, Artur. 1974. Neufranzösische Formen der Satzfrage im Kontext [‘Modern French Forms of the Yes/No Question in Context’]. Mainz and Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1990. Le bon usage [‘The Good Usage’]. (Twelfth edition.) Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul and Svetlana McCoy. 2002. “Presuppositions, wh-Questions, and Discourse Particles: Russian ze ”. Paper presented at FASl-11.
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. “Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language 10 (1): 41–53.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2001. “Syntax in Interaction: Form and Function of Yes/No Interrogatives in Spoken Standard French”. Studies in Language 25 (3): 463–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: Old French ‘ja’ between Latin IAM and Modern French ‘déjà’”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Romance, 39–165. (Volume 91.) Oxford: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The Structure of Modern Standard French: A Student Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, Studies in Pragmatics, 51–77. (Volume 181.) Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Jacqueline Visconti. 2009. “On the Diachrony of ‘Reinforced’ Negation in French and Italian”. In Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci and Adriana Spiridon (eds), Grammaticalization and Pragmatics, 137–171. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Egbert. 1980. Strukturen der Frage im Französischen: Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchungen zur direkten Frage im Französischen des 15. Jahrhunderts (1450–1500) [‘Interrogative Structures in French: Synchronic and Diachronic Research on the Direct Question in 15th Century French (1450–1500)’]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter. 1993. “Le ‘chinook’ roman face à l’empirie. Y a-t-il une conjugaison objective en français, en italien et en espagnol et une conjugaison subjective prédéterminante en français?” [“Romance ‘Chinook’ Put to the Test: Is There Object Agreement in French, Italian, and Spanish, as well as Leftward Subject Agreement in French?”]. In Gerold Hilty (ed.), Actes du XXe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Université de Zurich (6–11 avril 1992) [‘Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Romance Linguistics and Philology’], 169–190. (Volume 31.) Tübingen/Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2011. “Questions”. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1742–1758. (Volume 21.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Krifka (eds), Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Krifka (eds), Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Ian. 2018. “The Case of Special qui ”. Journal of French Language Studies 28 (1): 21–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Lindsey. 2007. WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of their Form and Function. PhD thesis. University of Austin.Google Scholar
Nilsenová, Marie. 2006. Rises and Falls: Studies in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar
Offord, Malcolm. 1976. “Negation in »Berinus«: A Contribution to the Study of Negation in Fourteenth Century French”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 921: 313–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poschmann, Claudia. 2015. Echo-Fragen: Vom Satztyp zur Fragebedeutung [‘Echo Questions: From Sentence Type to Interrogative Meaning’]. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga. 2017. “On the Analysis of Echo Questions”. Florida Linguistics Papers 4 (3).Google Scholar
Rouquier, Magali. 2002. “Les interrogatives en ‘qui/qu’est-ce qui/que’ en ancien français et en moyen français” [“Qui/qu’est-ce qui/que Interrogatives in Old and in Modern French”]. Cahiers de grammaire 271: 97–120.Google Scholar
Seelbach, Dieter. 1983. Linguistik und französischer Grammatikunterricht: Eine Einführung für Lehrende und Studierende [‘Linguistics and French Grammar Teaching: An Introduction for Teachers and for Students’]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Siouffi, Gilles. 2012. “La question en est-ce que: Une histoire de ‘dé-dialogisation’?” [“The est-ce que Interrogative: A History of ‘De-dialogisation’?”]. In Jacques Bres, Aleksandra Nowakowska, Jean-Marc Sarale and Sophie Sarrazin (eds), Dialogisme: langue, discours [‘Dialogism: Language, Discourse’], 47–60. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Söll, Ludwig. 1971. “Der neufranzösische direkte Fragesatz in einem Corpus der Kindersprache” [“The Modern French Direct Interrogative in a Children’s Language Corpus”]. In Eugenio Coseriu and Wolf-Dieter Stempel (eds), Sprache und Geschichte. Festschrift für Harri Meier zum 65. Geburtstag [‘Language and History: A Festschrift for Harri Meier on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday’], 493–506. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien de. 1959. Eléments de syntaxe structural [‘Elements of Structural Syntax’]. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2018. “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the est-ce que Question”, Open Linguistics 41: 56–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dekhissi, Laurie & Aidan Coveney
2021. Le contexte linguistique des questions rhétoriques conflictuelles et la variation entre pourquoi et qu’est-ce que. Langue française N° 212:4  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2021. Cyclic changes to the negative coordinating conjunction from Latin to Modern French. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2020. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.