Article published In:
Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 1:2 (2000) ► pp.175–199
Data in historical pragmatics
Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing
In this paper we examine four speech-related text types in terms of how linguistically close they are to spoken face-to-face interaction. Our “conversational” diagnostics include lexical repetitions, question marks (as an indicator of question-answer adjacency pairs), interruptions, and several single word interactive features (first- and second-person pronouns, private verbs and demonstrative pronouns). We discuss the nature of these diagnostics and then consider their distribution across our text types and across the period 1600 to 1720. We reveal: (1) a differential distribution across our text types (and suggest a number of explanatory factors), and (2) a shift over our period towards features associated with spoken face-to-face interaction (and make the tentative suggestion that this finding may be due to the development of “popular” literatures). We also make some preliminary remarks about our Shakespeare sample.
Cited by (50)
Cited by 50 other publications
Leone, Ljubica
2024.
The particle
forth
during the Early Modern English period: Linguistic interferences with the particles
on
and
out
. Studia Neophilologica 96:1 ► pp. 52 ff. 
Merkuryeva, N. Yu.
2024. Short Sentences of Responsive Replies from Dialogues of ‘Hamlet’ in Russian Translations. Nauchnyi dialog 13:2 ► pp. 118 ff.
Pastuch, Magdalena, Barbara Mitrenga & Kinga Wąsińska
2024. Anotacja socjolingwistyczna w Korpusie dawnych polskich tekstów dramatycznych (1772–1939). LingVaria 19:1(37) ► pp. 151 ff.
Reiter, Rosina Márquez
2024. Leveraging Relations in Diaspora,
Lalić, Ana
2023. On the Sources of Spoken (Italian) Language in a Historical Perspective. Društvene i humanističke studije (Online) 8:3(24) ► pp. 135 ff.
Thomas, Jenelle
Culpeper, Jonathan
Pastuch, Magdalena
2022. O rozwoju dyskursywnej funkcji form rozkazujących (na przykładzie słuchaj). LingVaria 17:2(34) ► pp. 143 ff.
MYCOCK, LOUISE & JAMES MISSON
2021. Lone pronoun tags in Early Modern English: ProTag constructions in the dramas of Jonson, Marlowe and Shakespeare. English Language and Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Nakayasu, Minako
2021. Spatio-Temporal Systems in Shakespeare’s Dialogues: A Case from Julius Caesar
. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:s1 ► pp. 425 ff.
Shevchenko, Iryna, Yuliia Matiukhina & Maria Liudvika Drazdauskienė
2021. The evolution of the English small talk: a cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :23 ► pp. 87 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2020. The development and pragmatic function of a non-inference marker. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 251 ff.
Davidse, Kristin & Hendrik De Smet
2020. Diachronic Corpora. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 211 ff.
Hickey, Raymond
2020. Chapter 11. Sure in Irish English. In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97], ► pp. 174 ff.
Jucker, Andreas
2020. Politeness in the History of English,
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style,
Fanego, Teresa & Paula Rodríguez-Puente
2019. Chapter 1. “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer?” English legal discourse past and present. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte
2019. Brazilian Portuguese <i>in-situ wh</i>-interrogatives between rhetoric and change. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Beeching, Kate, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli
2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 1 ff.
Enghels, Renata & María Elena Azofra Sierra
2018. Sobre la naturaleza de los corpus y la comparabilidad de resultados en lingüística histórica. Spanish in Context 15:3 ► pp. 465 ff.
Johnson, Alison J.
2018. Chapter 2. “How came you not to cry out?”. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 41 ff.
King, Jeremy
2018. Chapter 6. Hasta perder la última gota de mi sangre. In Language Variation and Contact-Induced Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 340], ► pp. 127 ff.
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
Molinelli, Piera
2018. Chapter 3. Sociocultural and linguistic constraints in address choice from Latin to Italian. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 51 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyk
2017. Historical (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 433 ff.
RODRÍGUEZ-PUENTE, PAULA
2017. Tracking down phrasal verbs in the spoken language of the past: Late Modern English in focus. English Language and Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present,
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. Chapter 8. Interpersonality in legal written discourse. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 171 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara
2016. DiSCIS: A new sociolinguistic and pragmatic corpus of Plautus’ comedies. Pallas :102 ► pp. 219 ff.
Fedriani, Chiara
2017. Chapter 7. Nulla sum, nulla sum: Tota, tota occidi. In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189], ► pp. 147 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Whitt, Richard J.
2014. Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, English historical pragmatics (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013. Pp. xiii + 236. ISBN 978-0-7486-4468-1.. English Language and Linguistics 18:3 ► pp. 593 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël
2013. The Imperative ofSayas a Pragmatic Marker in English and Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël
2019. A diachronic corpus study of prenominal zo’n ‘so a’ in Dutch. Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Cantos, Pascual
2012. The Use of Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Linguistic Variation and Change: Types and Computational Applications. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 99 ff.
Degand, Liesbeth & Benjamin Fagard
2012. Competing connectives in the causal domain. Journal of Pragmatics 44:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2011. In Pursuit of an Expert Identity: A Case Study of Experts in the Historical Courtroom. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:4 ► pp. 471 ff.
Defour, Tine & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2010. “Positive Appraisal” as a Core Meaning ofwell: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English Data. English Studies 91:6 ► pp. 643 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
2009. Tag Questions in English. Journal of English Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Grund, Peter
2007. FROM TONGUE TO TEXT: THE TRANSMISSION OF THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT EXAMINATION RECORDS. American Speech 82:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
Culpeper, J. & D. McIntyre
2006. Drama: Stylistic Aspects. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 772 ff.
Jucker, A.H.
2006. Historical Pragmatics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 329 ff.
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
2005. Review of Hiltunen & Watanabe (2004): Approaches to Style and Discourse in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 336 ff.
Sairio, Anni
2005. ‘Sam of Streatham Park’. European Journal of English Studies 9:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
GRUND, PETER, MERJA KYTÖ & MATTI RISSANEN
2004. EDITING THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT RECORDS: AN EXPLORATION OF A LINGUISTIC TREASURY. American Speech 79:2 ► pp. 146 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H
2003. Contrastive Analysis across Time: Issues in Historical Dialogue Analysis. In Contrastive Analysis in Language, ► pp. 197 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2018. Historische Pragmatik. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 132 ff.
Nevalainen, Terttu
2002. Language and Woman's Place in Earlier English. Journal of English Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.