Cover not available
Article published In:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 163–177

Periphery

Diachronic and cross-linguistic approaches

| Aoyama Gakuin University
| Stanford University
Keywords: grammaticalization, exchange-structure, interaction, action-structure, universals, periphery
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.01ono
References (45)
References
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014a. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Introduction”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Briz Goméz, AntonioGrupo Val.Es.Co and . 2003. “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje colloquial” [A System of Units for the Study of Spoken Language]. Oralia 61: 7–61.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: Some Universals of Human Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi. 2008. “The Cartography of Syntactic Structures”. Studies in Linguistics 21 (CISCL Working Papers, Siena, Italy): 42–58.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth. 2014. “‘So Very Fast Then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Langue Change, 151–78. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit. 2014. “ Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 24–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2014. Nihongo Cartography Josetsu [Introduction to the Cartography of Japanese Syntactic Structures]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shoboo.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2013. Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1): 19–33.Google Scholar
. 2009. “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics 11: 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975 “Logic and Conversation”. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Speech Acts (Syntax and Semantics, Volume 31), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. “Emergent Grammar”. In Jon Aske, Natasha Berry, Laura Michaelis and Hana Filip (eds), Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, 139–57. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. (Second revised edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature”. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications; Georgetown University Round Table ’84, 11–42. Washington, District of Columbia: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. by Brigitte Nerlich. (First published in German in 1990.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2005. “Nihongo keigo no bunpooka to imi henka” [The Grammaticalization and Semantic Change of Honorifics in Japanese]. Nihongo no Kenkyuu [Study of Japanese Language] 1 (3): 18–31.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Yukiko. 2004. “Kenjoogo kara mita keigoshi, teineigo kara mita keigoshi” [History of Honorifics from the Viewpoints of Humble Forms and Polite Forms]. In Yasuto Kikuchi (ed.), Keigo [Honorifics] (Asakura Nihongo Kooza 8), 200–224. Tokyo: Asakura.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Setting Up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. and Ryoko Suzuki (eds). 2007. Historical Changes in Japanese: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. (Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics) 8 (2).Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide and Jacqueline Visconti. 2011. “Left Periphery and Semantic Change: On the Development of the Italian Expressions of Trufulness Invero, Davvero, Veramente”. Paper presented at IPrA 12 . 3–8 July. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Liane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2004. The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy. 1984. “Speech Acts, Discourse Structure, and Pragmatic Connectives”. Journal of Pragmatics 8 (1): 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language 50 (4i): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation”. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 1–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2000. “Viewpoints and Polysemy: Linking Adversative and Causal Meanings of Discourse Markers”. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann (eds), Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 257–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2007. “(Inter)subjectification, Japanese Syntax and Syntactic Scope Increase”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (special issue of Historical Changes in Japanese – Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, edited by Noriko O. Onodera and Ryoko Suzuki) 8 (2): 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2014. “Obsolescence and Innovation in Discourse-Pragmatic Change: The View from Canada”. Paper presented at Discourse-Variation and Change (DiPVaC) 2 . 7–9 April. Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. “The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction”. Discourse Studies 7 (4/5): 481–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale (eds). 2010. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Ying Yang and Tak-Sum Wong. 2014. “On the Development of Sentence Final Articles (and Utterance Tags) in Chinese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 179–220. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2022. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Sanders, José & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2022. Coherence in translation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:2 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Degand, Liesbeth & Ludivine Crible
2021. Chapter 1. Discourse markers at the peripheries of syntax, intonation and turns. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2020. Semasiological cyclicity in the evolution of discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima, María Estellés & Salvador Pons Bordería
2018. Chapter 5. Beyond the notion of periphery. In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292], ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.