Cover not available
Article published In:
Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 282–306

The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese

| Tokyo Gakugei University, Japan
In present-day colloquial Japanese, daro(o)/desho(o), the conjectural forms of the copulas that are agglutinated to at the right periphery (RP) of the clause, are detached from the clause and are used as the stand-alone confirmation/agreement markers. This paper explores the developmental pathway from the RP daro(o)/desho(o) to the stand-alone discourse-pragmatic items, addressing how they serve “exchange structure” and “action structure”-related functions in Schiffrin’s (1987) model of discourse coherence. Evidence from corpus studies of these items in the early 1900s and in present-day Japanese suggest that the stand-alone uses developed from their uses at the RP through the anaphor. This paper provides further evidence for Onodera’s (2014, and elsewhere) suggestion that discourse-pragmatic items tend to be recruited from the RP items in the history of Japanese.
Keywords: anaphor, action structure, periphery, daro(o)/desho(o), exchange structure, discourse-pragmatic items
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.06hig
References (53)
Sources
Corpus 1: Taiyo Corpus (CD-ROM). Tokyo: Hakubunkan Shinsha, 2005. Accessed 1 March 2015 at: [URL].Google Scholar
Corpus 2: Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese (BCCWJ). Accessed 1 March 2015 at: [URL].
Corpus 3: Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai (GNK; 1997, 2002).
Keiseikai Shijuuhatte, Sharebon, Koten Bungaku 80, Shinpen Nihon Koten Bungaku Zenshuu [New Collection of Japanese Classical Literature], Japan Knowledge. Tokyo: Shogakukan. Accessed 1 November 2015 at: [URL].
Kotobank Dejitaru Daijisen (KDD). Accessed 1 November 2015 at: [URL].
Kotobank Daijirin, 3rd edition (KD). Accessed 1 November 2015 at: [URL].
Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (NKD) [Unabridged Dictionary of the Japanese Language], 2nd edition. 2000–2002. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
References
Beeching, Kate. 2016. “Alors/donc/then at the Right Periphery: Seeking Confirmation of an Inference”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Synchronic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Chor, Winnie, Foong Ha Yap and Tak-sum Wong. 2016. “Chinese Interrogative Particles as Talk Coordinators at the Right-Periphery: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 178–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2011. “Grammaticalization and Conversation”. In Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 424–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. “A Model for Relevance Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. “Insubordination and Its Uses”. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
GKBK = Gendai Kijutsu Bunpoo Kenkyuukai (ed). 2003. Gendai Nihongo Bunnpoo 4: Dai-8-bu Modaritii [Present-day Japanese Grammar 4: Section 8 Modality]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Gendai Nihongo Kenkyuukai (GNK). 1997. Josei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen [Female Language: at Place of Work]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2002. Dansei no Kotoba: Shokuba-hen [Male Language: at Place of Work]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko. 2014. “Development of Discourse-Pragmatic Markers in Modern Japanese: A Corpus-based Study of daro(o) and desho(o)”. Paper presented at Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change 2 . 7–9 April. Newcastle University, UK.
. 2015. “Periphery of Utterances and (Inter)subjectification in Modern Japanese: A Case Study of Competing Causal Conjunctions and Connective Particles”. In Andrew D.M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale and Richard Waltereit (eds), New Directions in Grammaticalization Research, 135–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko and Noriko O. Onodera. 2013. “Form-Function-Periphery Aapping in Japanese: ‘Exchange-Structure’ and ‘Action-Structure’”. Abstracts, 105–106. The 13th International Pragmatics Conference , 8–13 September. New Delhi, India.
Higashiizumi, Yuko and Keiko Takahashi. 2014. “Bunmatsu hyoogen kara hatsuwa bootoo no danwa hyooshiki-teki hyoogen e” [From Sentence-Final Expressions to Utterance-Initial Discourse-Pragmatic Expressions]. Dai 5-kai Corpus Workshop Yokooshuu [The 5th Corpus Japanese Linguistics Workshop Papers], 341–346. The 5th Corpus Japanese Linguistics Workshop, National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics . 8 March. Tokyo, Japan.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese. (Revised edition.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu. 2014. “Modal Particles and Discourse Markers: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” In Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea (eds), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 217–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyogoku, Okikazu and Eiichi Matsui. 1973. “Setsuzokushi no Hensen” [The Development of Conjunctions]. In Kazuhiko Suzuki and Oki Hayashi (eds), Hinshibetsu Nihonbunpoo Kooza 6: Setsuzokushi/Kandooshi [Japanese Grammar According to Parts of Speech 6: Conjunctions/Interjections], 89–136. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 1988. “From Bound Grammatical Markers to Free Discourse Markers: History of Some Japanese Connectives”. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society BLS 141, 340–351.
McGloin, Naomi H. 2002. “Markers of Epistemic vs. Affective Stances: Desyoo vs. Zyanai ”. In Noriko Akatsuka and Susan Strauss (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 101: 136–149. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko. 1996. “Historical Change of the Japanese Connective datte: Its Form and Functions” In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki and Susan Strauss (eds), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 51, 201–218. Stanford, California: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1998. “Close to the Edge”. In Toshio Ohori (ed.), Studies in Grammaticalization: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 193–197. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Destines of Subordination”. Paper presented at NINJAL International Symposium on Grammaticalization in Japanese and Across Languages . 3–5 July. Tokyo, Japan.
Okazaki, Tomoko. 2011. Nihongo Shijishi no Rekishiteki Kenkyuu [A Historical Study of Japanese Anaphors]. Tokyo: Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson and Yumi Sasaki. 2012. “Japanese Negotiation through Emerging Final Particles in Everyday Talk”. Discourse Processes 491: 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Historical Changes in Japanese: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 239–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Setting Up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 92–116. Leiden and Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. and Ryoko Suzuki (eds). 2007. Special Issue: Historical Changes in Japanese, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2).Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike. 2013. The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2016. “LP and RP in the Development of Discourse Markers from ‘what’ in Korean”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugiura, Hideyuki. 2012. “Deshoo o Mochiita Hyooka e no Ootoo: Kooi to “Nawabari” no setten” [Response to a Prior Evaluation with deshoo: Interface between Action and “Territory”]. Paper presented at Workshop of the 30th Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences , Tohoku University. 1–2 September. Miyagi, Japan.
. 2013. “ Deshoo Tandoku Taan ni yotte Hyoomeisareru Dooi no Tsuyosa: Maruchi-moodaru-bunseki ni yoru Apuroochi” [The Strength of Agreement Expressed by the Stand-alone deshoo: An Approach from Multimodal Analysis]. JCLA Conference Handbook 20131, 52–55. The Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1998. “Grammaticization of Clause-Final Elements”. In Toshio Ohori (ed.), Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, 129–134. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2007. “(Inter)subjectification in the Quotative tte in Japanese Conversation”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 207–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Japanese Quotatives: Another Peripheral Magnet”. Abstracts, 344–5. The 12th International Pragmatics Conference . 3–8 July. Manchester, UK.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Ryoko Suzuki. 2011. “The Grammaticalization of Final Particles”. In Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 668–680. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2014. “Toward a Constructional Framework for Research on Language Change”. In Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard Köning (eds), Grammaticalization: Theory and Data, 87–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Investing ‘Periphery’ from a Functionalist Perspective”. Linguistic Vanguards 1 (1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Graeme Trousdale 2010. “Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds), Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsuruhashi, Toshihiro. 2013. Kinseigo Suiryoo‐hyoogen no Kenkyu [Studies in Conjectural Expressions in Modern Japanese]. Osaka: Seibundo Publishing.Google Scholar
Yajima, Masahiro. 2011. “Jikanteki Kuukanteki Hikaku o Jiku ni Shita Kindaigo Bunpooshi Kenkyuu [A Historical and Areal Study of Grammar in Modern Japanese]”. In Hiroyuki Kanazawa and Masahiro Yajima (eds), Kindaigo Kenkyuu no Perspective [Perspective of the Early Modern Japanese Language], 56–82. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.