Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.104135


Davies, Mark
2007– TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. Available online at [URL].
Aijmer, K.
2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2009 “The BE06 Corpus of British English and Recent Language Change”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 [To be supplied].Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2003 “Compressed Noun-Phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy”. In Jean Aitchison and Diana M. Lewis (eds), New Media Language, 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
2009Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2006 [To be supplied].Google Scholar
2010 “Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1998Language Play. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
2001Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005The Stories of English. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Defour, Tine
2009 [To be supplied.]Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Finell, Anne
1989 “ Well now and then”. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 653–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990An Approach to Discource Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 383–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. and Sabine Stoll
2009 “Finding Developmental Groups in Acquisition Data: Variability-based Neighbor Clustering”. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 16 (3): 217–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 [To be supplied.]Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin and Stefan Th. Gries
2009 “Assessing Frequency Changes in Multistage Diachronic Corpora: Applications for Historical Corpus Linguistics and the Study of Language Acquisition”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (4): 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nick Smith, David Lee and Ylva Berglund Prytz
2008Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 “The Discourse Marker well: A Relevance – Theoretical Account”. Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “The Discourse Marker well in the History of English”. English Language Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Sara W. Smith
1998 “And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
2009 “Where Do We Backchannel? On The Use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like ”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (1): 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela and Andreas H. Jucker
2011 “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 1422–1434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2003 “Modals on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1991”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug and Frank R. Palmer (eds), Modality in Contemporary English, 223–240. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Nick Smith
2009 “Change and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991”. In Antoinette Renouf and Andrew Kehoe (eds), Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, 173–200. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Action Formation and Action Ascription”. In Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 103–130. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt and Corinne Rossari
2005 “The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Introduction”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 177–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009 “Modal Verbs in TIME: Frequency Changes 1923–2006”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (2): 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph
2007Conversation in Context: A Corpus-driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer
2014 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “Beginning to Respond: Well-prefaced Responses to Wh-questions”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1985 “Conversational Coherence: The Role of well ”. Language 611: 640–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike and Christopher Tribble
Svartvik, Jan
1980 “Well in Conversation”. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan Svartvik (eds), Studies in English Linguistics: For Randolph Quirk, 167–177. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
(eds) 2014Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini Bonelli, Elena
2010 “The Evolution of Corpus Linguistics”. In Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 14–27. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
1991 “Conversational Style in British and American English: The Case of Backchannels”. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 254–271. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014 “Turn Management and the Fillers uh and um ”. In Karin Aijmer and Christopher Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 381–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid
2002Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Bourgeois, Samuel
2022. “Oh yeah, one more thing: It’s gonna be huge.”. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105],  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2021. Chapter 12. Exploring sub-register variation in Victorian newspapers. In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103],  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo & Lucía Loureiro-Porto
2020. Democratization of Englishes: synchronic and diachronic approaches. Language Sciences 79  pp. 101275 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen & Jukka Tyrkkö
2020. Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. Language Sciences 79  pp. 101270 ff. DOI logo
Kytö, Merja
2019. Register in historical linguistics. Register Studies 1:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Marmorstein, Michal
2021. Discourse markers as a lens to variation across speech and writing. Functions of Language 28:2  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present, DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2018. TCU-initial backchannel overlap in storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 28:2  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2019. How Long Does it Take to Say ‘Well’? Evidence from the Audio BNC. Corpus Pragmatics 3:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020. What dialog is absent from constructed dialog?. English Text Construction 13:2  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2024. Chapter 1. Linguistic change in the 20th century. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Gerold & Maud Reveilhac
2023. Chapter 12. Colloquialisation, compression and democratisation in British parliamentary debates. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111],  pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Guichao
2022. Christoph Rühlemann: Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A guide for research . Intercultural Pragmatics 19:4  pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Haoran & Yueqing Deng
2023. Have media texts become more humorous?. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:3  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.