Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 23:1 (2022) ► pp.146–167

The combinative use of “imperative + final particle” in Tokyo language in the Meiji period

Characteristics and historical changes

| Huazhong University of Science and Technology
| Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Honorifics in Japanese as a rare linguistic system has received consistent attention in social and cultural linguistic studies. A typical linguistic structure of honorifics is “imperative + sentence-final particles (shuu-joshi)” (henceforth, “final particle”), which has been studied mainly as a compound expression in Tokyo language. Different from previous studies with separated attention towards imperative expressions and sentence-final particles in the Edo era as well as in modern Japan, this paper investigates the combinative use and diachronic changes of “imperative + final particle” during the Meiji period – a period of upheaval in the Tokyo dialect. The investigation takes multiple views including the positions and relations (social and psychological) between the interlocutors, and the context of the utterance. Results of the investigation lead to an insight into pragmatic norms and diachronic changes of the modern Tokyo dialect, specifically the tendencies, characteristics and the driving force.
This study finds the particular expressive effect accomplished by the combinational use of “imperative + final particle” in the modern Tokyo dialect. The speaker shapes the degree of respect or politeness with the selective use of imperatives, and signals the communicative attitude by adding sentence-final particles. This linguistic form manifests the demand for “acting upon”, unveils the social construct and cultural norms embedded in inter-personal communication. The analysis on the developmental trend of “imperative + final particle” suggests that the prototype of the Tokyo dialect brings to prominence the across-status expressions as a result of social, political and educational reforms.
Keywords: final particle, imperative expression, Meiji period, Tokyo dialect
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Source materials and research method
  • 3.Findings and discussions
    • 3.1An overview on the combinative use of “imperative + final particle” in the Tokyo dialect during the Meiji period
    • 3.2A deeper insight into the “imperative + final particle” structure in the Tokyo language during the Meiji period
      • 3.2.1The demonstrative effects of “imperative + final particle”
      • 3.2.2The diachronic shift of “imperative + final particle”
      • 3.2.3“Imperative + final particle” and the positions of the speaker
        • “Imperative + final particle” and gender of the speaker
        • “Imperative + final particle” and social status of the speaker
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Literary sources
  • References
Published online: 14 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18006.che
References (80)
Literary sources
1870. Seiyoodoothuu hizakurige, by Kanagaki Robun. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1871. Aguranabe, by Kanagaki Robun. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1873. Tokyoonichi shinbun, by Kawatake Mokuami. Mokuami Zenshuu 231 (1926). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1876. Harusame bunkoo, by Matsumura Harusuke. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1877. Fujibitai tsukubano shigeyama, by Kawatake Mokuami. Mokuami Zenshuu 121 (1925). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1879. Ningenbanji Kanenoyononaka, by Kawatake Mokuami. Mokuami Zenshuu 131 (1925). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1884. Kaidan botan tooroo, by Sanyuutei Enthoo. Enthoo Zenshuu 21 (1927). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1885. Narihirabunji hyooryuukidan, by Sanyuutei Enthoo. Enthoo Zenshuu 41 (1927). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1885. Kooshoobi, by Sanyuutei Entyoo. Entyoo Zenshuu 71 (1926). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1885. Eikoku kooshinoden, by Sanyuutei Enthoo. Enthoo Zenshuu 91 (1927). Tokyo: Syunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1885. Toosei shosei katagi, by Tsubouchi Shooyoo. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 161 (1969). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1886. Shinmigaki imooto sekagami, by Tsubouchi Shooyoo. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 161 (1969). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1887. Ukigumo, by Futabatei Shimei. Futabatei Shimei Zenshuu 11 (1964). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1888. Seitou bidan shukujo no misao, by Yoda Ga-kai. Seitou bidan shukujo no misao (1891). Tokyo: Kinkoodoo.Google Scholar
1888. Yabu no uguisu, by Miyake Kaho. Gendai Nihon Bungaku Taikei 51 (1972). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1889. Seitou bidan shukujo no gojitsu, by Yoda Ga-kai. Seitou bidan shukujo no misao (1891). Tokyo: Kinkoodoo.Google Scholar
1890. Yaezakura, by Miyake Kaho. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 811 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1892. Koinoyamai, by Ozaki kooyoo. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 861 (1965). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1894. Yuufuku shijin, by Kooda Rohan. Rohan Zenshuu 121 (1950). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1896. Tajootakon, by Ozaki kooyoo. Kooyoo Zenshuu 61 (1992). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1897. Konjikiyasha, by Ozaki kooyoo. Kooyoo Zenshuu 71 (1993). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1898. Kureno nijuuhachinichi, by Uchida Roan. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 241 (1978). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1898. Roshafu, by Uchida Roan. Bungei Shoohin (1899). Tokyo: Hakubunkan.Google Scholar
1902. Shakai hyakumennsoo, by Uchida Roan. Shakai Hyakumensoo (1902). Tokyo: Hakubunkan.Google Scholar
1902. Hanarewosi, by Ootsuka Naoko. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 811 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1903. Chikyoodai, by Kikuchi Yuuhoo. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 931 (1969). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1905. Wagaihai wa neko dearu, by Natsume Sooseki. Sooseki Zenshuu 11 (1993). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1906. Sonoomokage, by Futabatei Shimei. Futabatei Shimei Zenshuu 31 (1964). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1908. Sanshiroo, by Natsume Sooseki. Sooseki Zenshuu 51 (1994). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1908. Soradaki, by Ootsuka Naoko. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 811 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1909. Soradaki Zokuhen, by Ootsuka Naoko. Meiji bungaku Zenshuu 811 (1966). Tokyo: Chikuma.Google Scholar
1909. Natsudoro, by Yanagiya Kosan. Kooenso-ki Meiji Taishoo Rakugo Shuusei 61 (1980). Tokyo: Koodansha.Google Scholar
1909. Sorekara, by Natsume Sooseki. Sooseki Zenshuu 61 (1994). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1910. Mon, by Natsume Sooseki. Sooseki Zenshuu 61 (1994). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
1911. Shisei, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1911. Hookoo, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1911. Shoonen, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1911. Hookan, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1911. Hyoofuu, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1911. Himitsu, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1912. Akubi, by Tanizaki Junichiroo. Tanizaki Junichiroo Zenshuu 11 (1966). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
1912. Asagao, by Kubota mantaroo. Kubota mantaroo zenshuu 51 (1967). Tokyo: chuuookooronsha.Google Scholar
References
Chen, Changhao. 1987. “Shuujoshi: hanashite to kikite no ninshiki no gya-pu wo umeru tame no bunsetuji” [‘Final Particles: Suffixed Structure Bridging the Cognitive Distance between the Speaker and the Listener’]. Japanese Linguistics 6 (10): 93–109.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 2006. “Japanese Politeness as an Interactional Achievement: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities”. Multilingua 251: 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “Are Honorifics Polite? Uses of Referent Honorifics in a Japanese Committee Meeting”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3655–3672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia. 2005. “Pragmatic Functions of Humble Forms in Japanese Ceremonial Discourse”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (2): 218–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer, Naomi. 2008. “Style Shift as Facework: The Use of Plain and Masu Forms in Faculty Meetings”. In Kimberly Jones and Tsuyoshi Ono (eds), Style Shifting in Japanese, 39–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ha-tori, Tadasu. 2002. “Prosodic Features of Sentence-Final Particles ne and na: A Quantitative Comparison”. Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts annual reports of studies 53 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Himeno, Tomoko. 1993. “Futan to rieki”. Journal of Saitama University (Cultural science) 411: 47–56.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Kooishijikei hatsuwakooi no kinoo to keishiki” [‘Forms and Functions of Directive Discourse’]. Saitama University Review (Faculty of Liberal Arts) 33 (1): 169–178.Google Scholar
Hirose, Makiko. 1991. “Ukiyoburo”niokeru meireihoo nitsuite:isoo wo shitentoshite” [‘Imperatives in Ukiyo Buro: a phase perspective’]. Kokubuntsurumi 261: 30–53.Google Scholar
Itani, Reiko. 1996. “Dentatsuyitp tp nihongoshuujoshi: kanrenseiriron no tathiba kara” [‘Intentional Expressions and Final Particles in Japanese: A Perspective of the Connective Theory’]. Studies in Humanities 1261: 35–53.Google Scholar
Kashiwazaki, Masayo. 1992. Nihon ni okeru kooishijikeihyoogen no kinoo: “o~/~te kudasai” “~te kure” “~te” oyobi sonogimon/hiteigimonkei nitsuite (“Functions of Directive Expressions in Japanese: “o~/~te kudasai”, “ ~te kure”, “~te” and the Corresponding Sentences of Interrogation and Negative Interrogation”). Tokyo: Kuroshio PublishersGoogle Scholar
Katou, Atsusi. 2009. “Shuujoshi ‘yo/ne/na/ka’ no tairituteki imikinou: Hatsuwabamen niokeru ‘kikite no sonzai’ wo sihyoutosite”. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Pragmatics Society of Japan 41: 23–30.Google Scholar
Kudo, Mayumi. 1979. “Iraihyoogen no ha-tatsu” [‘Development in Imperative Expressions’]. Japanese and Japanese Linguistics 56 (1): 46–64.Google Scholar
Masukura, Yooko. 1994. “Tokyogo keiseiki niokeru ‘ne/yo’ no ichikousatsu” [‘Investigating the “ne/yo” in the Formulating Period of the Tokyo Language’]. Shoonan Literature 281: 121–132.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1986. “On Back-channel Behavior in Japanese and English Casual Conversation”. Linguistics 24 (6): 1079–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion, and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. “Synergistic Strategies in Grammar: A Case of Nominalization and Commentary Predicate in Japanese”. Word 48 (1): 15–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. K. 2002. Linguistic Emotivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moriya, mitiyo. 2006. “‘Kyoudoutyuui” to Syuujyoshi’. Gengo 35 (5): 62–67.Google Scholar
Nakano, Nobuhiko. 1990. “‘Imperative Sentence + Ya’ in Edo Japanese”. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Yamaguchi University 40 (1): 41–53.Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Function of the Final Particle in Edo Japanese: ‘Sayoonara + Final Particle’”. Japanese Linguistics 35 (11): 36–45.Google Scholar
Nakata, Hitoshi. 2015. “An Analysis of the Japanese Sentence-Final Particle yone by the Proportional Function of Speaker-Hearer Relation”. Japanese Language and Literature 421: 35–52.Google Scholar
Nita, Yoshio. 2014. “Modaritei toshiteno meireihyoogen” [‘Imperative Expressions for Attitudes’]. Japanese Linguistics 33 (04): 55–65.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. 2011. “The Use and Interpretation of Addressee Honorifics and Plain Forms in Japanese: Diversity, Multiplicity, and Ambiguity”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3673–3688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2000. “Development of Demo Type Connectives and na Elements: Two Extremes of Japanese Discourse Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (1): 27–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a. “Evolution of d Connectives: A Productive Process and its Motivation: From a Historical Pragmatic Study of Japanese”. Presented paper (poster) at the International Symposium on the History and Structure of Japanese, the Second Oxford-Kobe Linguistics Seminar. 26–29 September. Kobe Institute, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
2004b. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. “Interplay of (Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 239–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Hatuwa no hajime to owari: Goyoronteki tyousetu no nasareru basyo. Tokyo: HitsujisyobouGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon. 2011. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. (Second edition.) Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Akio. 1957. “Kindai Tokyo meireihyoogen no tsuujiteki kousatsu” [‘Diachronic Investigation of Imperative Expressions in Modern Tokyo Language’]. National Language and Linguistics 34 (5): 41–54.Google Scholar
Tanomura, Tadaharu. 1994. “Shuujoshi no bunpoo: edogoshiryoo ni miru shuujoshi no taikeisei” [‘Grammar of Final Particles: The Mechanism of Edo Corpus’]. Japanese Linguistics 13 (4): 94–112.Google Scholar
Terada, Yoshie. 1999. “Edokouki hanashibon ni okeru tyokusetsu meireihyoogen: keigojyodoushi/hojyodoushi wo tyuuxintoshite” [‘Direct Imperative Expression in the Late Edo Period: Focusing on Honorific Auxiliaries and Supplementary Auxiliaries’]. Journal of the Graduate School Kokugakuin University. Graduate School of Letters 301: 225–242.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003a. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification”. In Raymond Hickey (eds), Motives for Language Change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b. “Constructions in Grammaticalization“. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “IPra IX. Panel on Historical Changes in Japanese: With Special Focus on Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. Comments presented at the Ninth International Pragmatics Conference”. 12 July. Riva del Garda, Italy.
Yamada, Rina. 2014. “Imperative Expression Usage by Imperative Forms During the last Part of the Edo Period-Mainly Focusing on ‘o ~ nasai’, ‘~ nasai’, ‘o ~’ -”. The Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education of Waseda University. Separate volume 21 (02): 139–152.Google Scholar