Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 23:1 (2022) ► pp.84–110

From deontic modality to conditionality

A diachronic investigation into bì in Classical Chinese

ORCID logo | University of Edinburgh
While epistemic modality has been suggested to be a modal source of conditionality, deontic modality has been generally overlooked. Using data from Classical Chinese and the Invited Inferencing Theory of Semantic Change, this study demonstrates that the deontic modal bi tends to invite inferences of conditionality in contexts where it is used teleologically and performatively as an indirect speech act of advice. That is, conditionality can emerge out of an interaction of teleological and performative meanings. Furthermore, three conditions are identified as where teleological, performative and conditional meanings enable the inferencing of the deontic modal bi as a conditional protasis connective. The absence of one or more of these conditions is shown to be less likely to invite inferences of conditionality.
Keywords: advice, conditional, deontic modal, invited inferencing, teleological modal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, the history of bi and the scope of investigation
    • 2.1Data
    • 2.2The history of bi
    • 2.3Scope
  • 3.Teleological modality, speech act of advice and speech act conditional
    • 3.1Teleological modal
    • 3.2Speech act of advice
    • 3.3Conditionals as speech acts
  • 4.The framework and the inference-inviting conditions
    • 4.1The framework
    • 4.2Three conditions for conditionality
  • 5.Inferencing of conditionality from modal bi
    • 5.1Representative cases
    • 5.2Less representative cases
    • 5.3Cases with less plausible conditional inferences
      • 5.3.1Lacking Condition III: Teleological bi with a short scope
      • 5.3.2 Lacking Condition II: Conceptual asymmetry between p and q
  • 6.Result of the change
  • 7.An alternative scenario
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 26 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19002.kuo
References (42)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. “Japanese Modals are Conditionals”. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson and Lynn A. MacLeod (eds), The Joy of Grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Negative Conditionality, Subjectification, and Conditional Reasoning”. In Angeliki Athanasiadou and René Dirven (eds), On Conditionals Again, 323–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology 2 (1): 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chou, Fa-Kao. 1961. A Historical Grammar of Ancient Chinese. (Part 1: Syntax.) Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat and Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. “A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewal (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eifring, Halvor. 1995. Clause Combination in Chinse. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Bill Jirsa. 2006. “The Principle of Indirect Means in Language Use and Language Structure”. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (4): 513–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L. and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. “On Invited Inferences”. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 561–566.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2020. “Introduction: The Role of Pragmatics in Cyclic Language Change”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (2): 165–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herforth, Derek. 1994. “Conditional Sentences in Old Chinese”. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.
Hilpert, Martin. 2010. “What Can Gradience Tell Us about Reanalysis? Verb-first Conditionals in Written German and Swedish”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, 181–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. 2020. “Late-Stage Grammatical Change in Chinese: A Constructional Account”. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
. 2021. “Morphosyntactic Vagueness and Directionality”. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9 (1): 95–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022a. “From Dynamic Modal to Conditional Protasis Connective: Evidence from Chinese Néng ‘be able to’”. Functions of Language 29 (2): 143–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Carles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi. 2004. “Modality in English and Chinese: A Typological Perspective”. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Liu, Xiaoming. 2018. “Diachronic Change of Modal Adverbs ‘Cheng/Shi’, ‘Bi/Ding’ and ‘Rong/Xu’”. (Unpublished MA dissertation.) Yanbian: Yanbian University.
Meisterernst, Barbara. 2013. “A Syntactic Analysis of Modal Bi 必: Auxiliary Verb or Adverb?”. In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri and Thekla Wiebusch (eds), Breaking Down the Barriers, 425–449. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. 1978. “Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts”. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 261–280. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ota, Tatsuo. 2003. A Historical Grammar of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1979. Modality and the English Modals. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Xingchen and Xinren Chen. 2019. “Doing Power Threatening Acts (PTAs) in Ancient China: An Empirical Study of Chinese Jian Discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20 (1): 132–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Dingxu. 2000. “Topic and Topic-Comment Constructions in Mandarin Chinese”. Language 76 (2): 383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1985. “Conditional Markers”. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “Do Semantic Modal Maps Have a Role in a Constructionalization Approach to Modals?”. Constructions and Frames 8 (1): 98–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Nest, Daan. 2010. “Should Conditionals Be Emergent… Asyndetic Subordination in German and English as a Challenge to Grammaticalization Research”. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete, Kristin Davidse and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research, 95–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.