Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 10:1 (2022) ► pp.90–112

The agency of CLIL primary school teachers in Austria

ORCID logo | Private University College of Teacher Education Graz
ORCID logo | University of Graz
Although recent years have seen a growth in studies examining teacher agency, educators working in the primary sector remain a relatively under-researched population. One specific group of teachers in primary education are those who teach Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). In this study, we wanted to understand how CLIL primary teachers’ sense of agency helped them to navigate this professional role, considering factors in their ecologies which supported or inhibited their agency. Based on semi-structured, in-depth interviews with six primary school CLIL teachers, this study shows that even though these teachers were initially passionate about CLIL, they all ultimately exercised their agency as teachers in giving up on CLIL due to a limited sense of agency in the particular role as a CLIL educator.
Keywords: self, agency, CLIL, primary, Austria
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Teacher agency in second language acquisition
    • 2.2CLIL teachers’ agency
    • 2.3CLIL in Austrian primary schools
  • 3.Research design and methodology
    • 3.1Interviews
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Ethics
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Restrictions on CLIL Teachers’ Sense of Agency
      • 4.1.1Lack of support
      • 4.1.2Self-confidence
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.20032.gru
References (64)
References
Aguilar, M. (2017). Engineering lecturers’ views on CLIL and EMI. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 722–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 301, 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arshad, V. & Lyster, R. (2021). Professional development in action: Teachers’ experiences in learning to bridge language and content. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 233–250). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Berg, J. M., Dutton, J. E. & Wrzesniewski, A. (2013). Job crafting and meaningful work. In B. J. Dik, Z. S. Byrne & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 81–104). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (5th ed.). Springer Medizin Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bovellan, E. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about learning and language as reflected in their views of teaching materials for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). [Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland].
Brosius, H.-B., Haas, A. & Koschel, F. (2012). Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Eine Einführung. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, B. (2007). Facts & Figures im Grundschul-Englisch. Eine Untersuchung des verbindlichen Fremdsprachenunterrichts ab der ersten Klasse an österreichischen Volksschulen. Lit Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (BMBWF). (2020). Das Pädagogik-Paket. Zeitgemäß. Transparent. Fair. [URL]
Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur (BMUKK). (2005). Lehrplan der Volksschule. Achter Teil, Bildungs- und Lehraufgaben sowie Lehrstoff und didaktische Grundsätze der verbindlichen Übungen, Grundschule – Lebende Fremdsprache (1.-4. Schulstufe). [Stand. BGBl. II Nr. 368/2005, November 2005]. [URL]
. (2012). Lehrplan der Volksschule. [BGBl. Nr. 134/1963 in der Fassung BGBl. II Nr. 303/2012 vom 13. September 2012]. [URL]
Burmeister, P. & Pastemak, R. (2007). Exciting and dangerous… Das Thema “Fire” im fremdsprachlichen Sachfachunterricht. Grundschule, 39(4), 36–40.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (2010). Getting recognised: Teachers negotiating professional identities as learners through talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 261, 473–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creswell, W. J. & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dafouz, E. (2021). ‘So, after a week, I became a teacher of English:’ Physics lecturers’ beliefs on the Integration of Content and Language in English-Medium Higher Education. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 134–153). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J. & Smit, U. (2021). From voluntary to obligatory CLIL in upper secondary technical colleges: Teacher and student voices from a diverse landscape. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 93–111). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Day, C. (2007). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. In T. Townsend & R. Bates (Eds.), Handbook of teacher education: Globalization, standards and professionalism in times of change (pp. 597–612). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, C. & Qing, G. (2009). Teacher emotions: Wellbeing and effectiveness. Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 15–31). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G. & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diekmann, A. (2013). Empirische Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendung. Rowohlt Verlag.Google Scholar
Doiz, A. & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Teachers’ and students’ second language motivational self-system in English-medium instruction: A qualitative approach. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 657–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Csizér, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language teaching research, 2(3), 203–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D. & Seligman, M. E. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. (2012). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410–426). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecclestone, K. (2007). An identity crisis? The importance of understanding agency and identity in adults’ learning. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 121–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K. & Hökkä, P. (2015). How do novice teachers in Finland perceive their professional agency? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 660–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feryok, A. (2012). Activity theory and language teacher agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flick, U. (2012). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung. Rohwolt Verlag.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. (2017). Exploring resilience and wellbeing with mid-career primary teachers in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A strengths-based approach. [Master thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand].
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gefaell, C. & Unterberger, B. (2010). CLIL programme evaluation: Deriving implementation guidelines from stakeholder perspectives. Vienna English Working Papers, 19(3), 29–35.Google Scholar
Gierlinger, E. M. (2021). L2 confidence in CLIL teaching: A tale of two teachers. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (S. 195–212). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gruber, M.-T. (2017). PrimA-CLIL: Multiple stakeholders’ perceptions of CLIL and its implementation at the primary school level in Austria. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Graz, Austria].
Gruber, M.-T., Buchholz, B., Neugebauer, G., Fanta, H., Reiter, I., Lasnik, S., Blahowsky, G., Fasching, M. & Lewis, C. (2021). Der Lehrplan für „Lebende Fremdsprache in der Volksschule“ in der Praxis – Reflexion, Evaluierung und Perspektive der Implementierung auf der Primarstufe. In A. Holzinger, S. Kopp-Sixt, S. Luttenberger & D. Wohlhart (Eds.), Fokus Grundschule Band 2. Forschungsperspektiven und Entwicklungslinien. Waxmann.Google Scholar
Gruber, M.-T., Lämmerer, A., Hofstadler, N. & Mercer, S. (2020). Flourishing or floundering: Factors contributing to CLIL primary teachers’ wellbeing in Austria. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstadler, N., Talbot, K., Mercer, S. & Lämmerer, A. (2020). The thrills and ills of CLIL. In C. Gkonou, J.-M. Dewaele & J. King (Eds.), Language teaching: An emotional rollercoaster (pp. 13–30). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Infante, D., Benvenuto, G. & Lastrucci, E. (2008). Integrating content and language at primary school in Italy: Ongoing experimental research. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 74–82.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Munoz, A. (2021). ‘It wasn’t my fault’: Lecturers’ notes to former selves after five years of EMI service. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 175–195). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jin, J., Talbot, K. R. & Mercer, S. (2021). EMI teacher identity, language use and reported behaviours in Austrian Higher Education. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 33–54). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., Aro, M. & Ruohotie-Lythy, M. (2016). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayi-Aydar, H., Gao, X., Miller, E. R., Varghese, M. & Vitanova, G. (Eds). (2019). Theorizing and analyzing language teacher agency. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Massler, U. (2012). Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 36–46.Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2013). QCAmap: A software for qualitative content analysis. [URL]
Mercer, S. (2011). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. R. & Gkonou, C. (2018). Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 791, 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millonig, D. J. (2015). Integrating English as a foreign language in Austrian primary schools: Contextual and participant perspectives. [Doctoral dissertation, The Open University, United Kingdom].
Moate, J. (2011). The impact of foreign language mediated teaching on teachers’ sense of professional integrity in the CLIL classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 333–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Reconceptualising teacherhood through the lens of foreign-language mediation. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Finland]. [URL]
Moate, J. & Ruohotie-Lythy, M. (2020). Identity and agency development in a CLIL-based teacher education program [Special Issue]. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(2), 92–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pappa, S. (2021). Identity and emotions in teaching CLIL: The case of primary school teachers in Finland. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 16–32). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. & Eteläpelto, A. (2017a). Teachers’ pedagogical and relational identity negotiation in the Finnish CLIL context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 651, 61–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: tensions and resources, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J. & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roffey, S. (2012). Pupil wellbeing – teacher wellbeing: Two sides of the same coin? Educational and Child Psychology, 29(4), 8–17.Google Scholar
Ruohotie-Lythy, M. & Moate, J. (2016). Who and how? Preservice teachers as active agents developing professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 551, 318–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinnari, K. (2020). CLIL challenges: Secondary school CLIL teachers’ voices and experienced agency in three European contexts [Special Issue]. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(2), 6–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinnari, K. & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL teachers’ beliefs about integration and about their professional roles: Perspectives from a European context. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 145–170). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sylvén, L. K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden-why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talbot, K. R., Gruber, M.-T., Lämmerer, A., Hofstadler, N. & Mercer, S. (2021). Comparatively speaking: CLIL/EMI teacher well-being at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels in Austria. In K. Talbot, M.-T. Gruber & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating language and content: Teacher and learner perspectives (pp. 154–174). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegner, A. (2012). Seeing the bigger picture: What students and teachers think about CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 29–34.Google Scholar
White, C. J. (2016). Agency and emotion in narrative accounts of emergent conflict in an L2 classroom. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 579–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Language teacher agency. In S. Mercer & A. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language Teacher Psychology (pp. 196–210). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar