Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices
This paper studies rhetorical questions containing cognitive verbs that function as reproaches in Spanish. Its two
main goals are to determine the degree of specialization of rhetorical questions as reproaches and to examine the characterization
of reproaching as a speech act, indicating the distinctive features that distinguish it from other similar speech acts.
Based on a contextual analysis of approximately 500 instances of reproaches in conflict talk drawn from the
Spanish Royal Academy’s Corpes XXI corpus, I identify and describe the most commonly used cognitive verbs and syntactic structures used
in rhetorical questions. The results show that reproach is a reactive-provocative speech act in which the speaker reacts to a
contradiction perceived in their interlocutor’s words, actions or thoughts. The speaker appeals to their interlocutor’s moral
conscience, making them think about this inconsistency; finally, the speaker creates the expectation of a duty that should have
been carried out by the interlocutor.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1The reproach as a hostile act
- 2.2The illocutionary force of the reproach
- 2.3Features that characterize rhetorical questions in relation to reproaching
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Preliminary data: Cognitive perception verbs in RQ reproaches
- 3.2Final corpus and data retrieval
- 4.Analysis and results
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1RQs with cognitive verbs as reproaches
- 5.2Reproaching as a speech act
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (55)
References
Albelda Marco, Marta. forth. 2022. “¿No te das cuenta de que me estás molestando? Las recriminaciones intensificadas mediante preguntas
retóricas” (‘Can’t you see you’re hassling me? Intensified reproaches
expressed by rhetorical questions’). Lingüística Española
Actual. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albelda Marco, Marta, and Maria Estellés. 2021. “De nuevo sobre la intensificación pragmática: revisión y propuesta” (‘Revisiting pragmatic intensification: revision and definition proposal’). Estudios
Románicos 301: 15–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alcaide Lara, Esperanza. R. 2019. “Imagen social y
contextos socioculturales en el discurso publicitario institucional español con fines
sociales (‘Social face and sociocultural contexts in the discourse of
official advertising for social purposes’)”. Sociocultural
Pragmatics 7(3): 297–334.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anzilotti, Gloria. 1982. “The
Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian.” Canadian Modern
Language Review 381: 290–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Kent, and Robert Harnish. 1979. Linguistic
Communication and Speech Acts. Massachusetts: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ballmer, Thomas T., and Waltrau Brennenstuhl. 1981. Speech
Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity
Verbs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bertomeu, Pau. 2022. Peticiones en alemán y español: un estudio contrastivo a partir de Gran Hermano (‘Requests in German and Spanish: a contrastive study based on Big Brother’). Bern: Peter Lang. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanco, Antonio. 2008. “Cómo hacer cosas malas con las palabras: actos ilocucionarios hostiles y los fundamentos de la teoría actos de
habla (‘How to do bad things with words: hostile illocutionary acts and the
basics of speech act theory’).” CRÍTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de
Filosofía 40(118): 3–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosque Muñoz, Ignacio. 1980. Sobre la negación (‘On
negation’). Madrid: Cátedra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bousfield, Derek. 2013. “Face
in Conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and
Conflict 1(1): 37–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boxer, Diana. 1993. “Social
Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of
Pragmatics 191: 103–125. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boxer, Diana. 2002. “Nagging:
The Familial Conflict Arena.” Journal of
Pragmatics 341: 49–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Briz Gómez, Antonio. 2017. “Una propuesta funcional para el análisis de la estrategia pragmática intensificadora en la conversación
coloquial (‘A functional proposal for analysing intensifying pragmatic
strategies in colloquial conversation’).” In Atenuación e
intensificación en géneros discursivos (‘Mitigation and intensification in
discourse genres’)”, ed. by Marta Albelda, and Wiltrud Mihatsch, 43–67. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burguera Serra, Joan. 2009. Gramática y pragmática de la interrogación retórica en español. Una aplicación al debate
parlamentario (‘Grammar and pragmatics of rhetorical questions in Spanish. An
application to parliamentary
debate’). Barcelona: University of Barcelona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. “Questioning
Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and
Reagan.” Journal of
Communication 52(4): 749–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, Emanuela. 2005. “Per una nuova classificazione dell’illocuzione a partire da un corpus di parlato
(LABLITA) (‘Towards a new classification of illocution based on a spoken
corpus’)”. In Tradizione e innovazione: il
parlato (‘Tradition and innovation: speech’), ed.
by Elisabeth Burr, 233–246. Pisa: Cesati.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
D’Amico-Reissner, Lynne. 1985. “An
Ethnolinguistic Study of Disapproval Exchanges.” Ph.D.
dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Escandell, María Victoria. 1987. La interrogación
en español: semántica y pragmática (‘Questions in Spanish: semantics and
pragmatics’) Madrid: Universidad Complutense.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1998. “Regularity
and Idiomacity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let
Alone
”. Language 84/31: 501–538.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furuta, Yumie. 2017. Clasificación de los verbos del español atendiendo a la configuración de sus argumentos
oracionales (‘Classification of Spanish verbs according to the configuration of
their sentence-level
arguments’). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gancedo, Marta. 2019. Evolución de la imagen de rol familiar en el teatro de finales del siglo XIX a mitad del XX. Su manifestación en
la atenuación e intensificación de los actos directivos (‘Evolution of the image
of the role of the family in the theatre from the late 19th to the mid-20th century. As shown in mitigation and
intensification of directive
acts’). Valencia: University of Valencia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. “Introduction:
Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice
Theory.” Journal of Politeness
Research 9(1): 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2021. “Impoliteness
and Conflict in Spanish”. In The Routledge Handbook of Spanish
Pragmatics, ed. by Dale Koike, and César Félix-Brasdefer, 371–386. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García-Miguel, José María, and Susana Comesaña. 2004. “Verbs
of Cognition in Spanish: Constructional Schemas and Reference
Points.” In Linguagem, Cultura e Cognição. Estudios de
Lingüistica Cognitiva (‘Language, Culture and Cognition. Cognitive Linguistics
Studies’), ed. by Augusto Soares, Amadeu Torres, and Miguel Gonçalves, 399–419. Coimbra: Almedina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García-Ramón, Amparo. 2018. Epistemicidad en interacción: (a)simetrías epistémicas en secuencias de acuerdo y su relación con la
construcción de roles funcionales en conversaciones y entrevistas (‘Epistemicity
in interaction: epistemic (a)symmetries in agreement sequences and their relation to the construction of functional roles in
conversations and
interviews’). Valencia: University of Valencia![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions
at Work: The Nature of Generalization in
Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.) 1990. Conflict
Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in
Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hancher, Michael. 1979. “The
Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in
Society 8(1): 1–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haverkate, Henk. 2006. “Aspectos pragmalingüísticos de la interrogación en español con atención especial a las secuencias de
preguntas (‘Pragmalinguistic aspects of questions in Spanish with particular
attention to question sequences’).” Cultura, lenguaje y
representación 31: 27–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2011. “Territories
of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in
Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in
Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ilgizovna, Ikhsanova. 2018. “The
Pragmatic Potential of Rhetorical Questions in English Informal Speech.” Paper presented
at 78º Eurasian Scientific
Association, Moscow.
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What
else can I tell you? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative
Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kasper, Gabriele. 1988. “Variation
in Interlanguage Speech Act Realization.” University of Hawai’i Working Papers in
ESL 7(2): 117–142.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oh, Choon-Kyu, and David A. Dinneen (eds.). 1979. Syntax
&
Semantics. Vol. 111: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez Hernández, Lorena. 2001. Illocution
and Cognition: A Constructional
Approach. Logroño: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Rioja.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plantin, Christian. 2005. L’argumentation:
histoire, théories et perspectives. París: Presses universitaires. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt-Radefeldt, Jürgen. 1977. “On
So-called Rhetorical Questions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 11: 375–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John. 1969. Speech
Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Neilson (ed.) 1982. Mutual
Knowledge. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soler, Amparo. 2021. Semántica de creo. Análisis cognitivo de la polisemia de una forma verbal doxástica en la interacción oral en
español. (‘Semantics of creo: Cognitive analysis of the polysemy of a doxastic
verb form in oral interaction in
Spanish’). Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spanish Royal Academy: Databank (CORPES) [online database]. Corpus del español del siglo XXI [URL]> Last accessed: August 2021.
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew. 2008. “Introduction:
Questioning and Affiliation/ Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 10(1): 5–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance,
Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of
Affiliation.” Research on Language & Social
Interaction 41(1): 31–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, Jenny. 1986. “The
Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction.” Doctoral
Dissertation. University of Lancaster.
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization
and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uclés, Gloria. 2021. Atenuación y actividades de imagen en México y España a través de marcadores de control del
contacto (‘Mitigation and face activities in Mexico and Spain through phatic
markers’). Valencia: University of Valencia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Rooy, Robert. 2003. “Negative
Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance.” Journal of
Semantics 201: 239–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viberg, Ake. 1983. “The
Verbs of Perception: A Typological
Study.” Linguistics 211: 123–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English
Speech Act Verbs. A Semantic
Dictionary. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Carvalho, Paula, Danielle Caled, Cláudia Silva, Fernando Batista & Ricardo Ribeiro
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.
Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach.
Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1
► pp. 89 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Silva, Cláudia & Paula Carvalho
2023.
When Can Compliments and Humour Be Considered Hate Speech? A Perspective From Target Groups in Portugal.
Comunicação e Sociedade 43
► pp. e023006 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.