This contribution looks into a speech by Russian President Vladimir Putin after the terrorist attack against a high school in the Northern Caucasian town Beslan in September 2004, widely seen as marking the end of the liberal hegemony in the Russia of the post-soviet period. However, a closer look reveals the many possible readings that are made of the speech. According to the reactions found in a corpus of press articles, the speech activates both “internationalist” and “sovereignist” readings in media discourse. By pointing out the polyphonic organization of discourse, I make the case for a productive exchange between the French tradition of discourse analysis, interactionism and critical discourse analysis. In this view, the readers have to deal with the many different voices crisscrossing political discourse. In the light of its polyphonic organization, the meaning of discourse needs to be “fixed” by the participants of political discourse.
Angermüller, Johannes. 2011. From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse. Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics 431, 2992—3000.
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline. 1982. Hétérogénéité montrée et hétérogénéité constitutive. Éléments pour une approche de l’autre dans le discours. DRLAV 261, 91—151.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Benveniste, Émile. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 21. Paris: Gallimard.
Culioli, Antoine. 2002. Variations sur la linguistique. Entretiens avec Frédéric Fau. Paris: Klincksieck.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le Dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.). Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972—79. London: Hutchinson, 128—138.
Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading. A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kristeva, Julia. 1970. Présentation: Une poétique runinée. In: Mikhaïl Bakhtine (ed.). La poétique de Dostoïevski. Paris: Seuil, 1—21.
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York: Verso.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1993. Le Contexte de l’œuvre littéraire. Énonciation, écrivain, société. Paris: Dunod.
Nølke, Henning, Kjersti Fløttum and Coco Norén. 2004. ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.
Nonhoff, Martin. 2006. Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie. Das Projekt ‚Soziale Marktwirtschaft‘. Bielefeld: transcript.
Pêcheux, Michel. 1981. Ouverture du colloque. In: Bernard Conein, Jean-Jacques Courtine, Françoise Gadet, Jean-Marie Marandin and Michel Pêcheux (eds.). Matérialités discursives. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 15—18.
Seriot, Patrick. 2007. Généraliser l’unique: genres, types et sphères chez Bakhtine. Texto! 12 (3), http://www.revue-text-net/1996—1997/Inedits/Seriot_Bakhtine.pdf, last access on 02/03/2009.
van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. (eds.) 1996. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Karin Liebhart, Maria Kargl and Klaus Hofstätter. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Bekzhanova, Zhazira & Tsediso Michael Makoelle
2022. Latinization of the Kazakh Alphabet: Implications for Education, Inclusion, and Social Cohesion in Kazakhstan. SAGE Open 12:4 ► pp. 215824402211388 ff.
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff.
Savski, Kristof
2020. Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Declercq, Jana & Ricardo A. Ayala
2017. Examining “Elite” Power Dynamics in Informant–Research Relations and Its Impact on Ethnographic Data Construction. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16:1 ► pp. 160940691770413 ff.
Beetz, Johannes
2016. The Materiality of Language and the Decentered Subject. In Materiality and Subject in Marxism, (Post-)Structuralism, and Material Semiotics, ► pp. 73 ff.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2015. Posttotalitarian Discourses in Central and Eastern Europe. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Oleinik, Anton
2015. The language of power: a content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the Former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015:236
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.