Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 12:1 (2013) ► pp.80–100

A political-semiotic introduction to the Estonian “bronze-night” discourse

| Tallinn University
On April 26–27, 2007 Estonia witnessed its largest civil unrest since the country’s regaining of independence in 1991. The mass riots related to government’s displacement of a memorial (containing a bronze statue) from the centre of Estonia’s capital to a military cemetery a couple of kilometers away came to be referred to as “bronze-night” in Estonian public discourse. Using a framework based on Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory, Jakobson’s model of communication and concepts from semiotics and political analysis it provides an initial chart of the discourse unified around this empty signifier “bronze-night”
Keywords: Estonia, “bronze-night”, discourse, communication, democracy, populism
Published online: 13 May 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.1.04sel
References (33)
References
Arcand, Richard, and Nicole Bourbeau. (1995). La communication efficace. De l’intention aux moyens d’expression. Anjou: CEC.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. (1993). Mythologies. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. (1991). Seduction. Translated by Brian Singer. Montréal: New World Perspectives.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2005. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Anthology, ed. by Derek Matravers, and Jon Pike, 342–360. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davydova, Olga. 2008. “Bronze Soldier Goes Transnational: Mediascapes and the Formation of Identities in Internet Discussions.” Ethnopolitics 7 (4): 391–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449050802243459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. (1988). John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Ehala, Martin. 2009. “The Bronze Soldier: Identity Threat and Maintenance in Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Studies 40 (1): 139–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629770902722294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehin, Piret. 2009. “Political Support and Political Participation: Comparison of Estonians and Non-Estonians.” In Estonian Human Development Report 2008, ed. by Marju Lauristin, 91–95. Tallinn: Eesti Koostöö Kogu.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (1993). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackmann, Jörg, and Marko Lehti. 2008. “Introduction: Contested and Shared Places of Memory. History and Politics in North Eastern Europe.” Journal of Baltic Studies 39 (4): 377–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629770802461134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallin, Daniel, and Stylianos Papathanassopoulos. 2002. “Political Clientelism and the Media: Southern Europe and Latin America in Comparative Perspective.” Media, Culture & Society 24 (2): 175–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. (2002). Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hébert, Louis. 2011. The Functions of Language. in Louis Hébert (dir.), Signo [online], Rimouski (Quebec). http://www.signosemio.com/jakobson/functions-of-language.asp.
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1971). Selected Writings (Vol. 21). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kattago, Siobhan. 2010. “Memory, Pluralism and the Agony of Politics.” Journal of Baltic Studies 41 (3): 383–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2010.498213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kekic, Laza. 2007. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s index of democracy. http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf
Kripke, Saul. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Politics of Rhetoric.” In Material Events: Paul de Man and the Afterlife of Theory, ed. by Tom Cohen, Barbara s, Hillis Miller, and Andrzej Warminski, 229–253. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lehti, Marko, Matti Jutila, and Markku Jokisipilä. 2008. “Never-Ending Second World War: Public Performances of National Dignity and the Drama of the Bronze Soldier.” Journal of Baltic Studies 39 (4): 393–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629770802461175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert. (1989). Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri, and Boris Uspenskij. 2004. Миф — имя — культура [Myth – name – culture]. In: Лотман, Ю.М., Семиосфера [The Semiosphere], 525–543. Санкт-Петербург: «Искусство-СПБ».Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Maria. 2009. “Review of ‘Monumentaalne konflikt: mälu, poliitika ja identiteet tänapäeva Eestis. Pille Petersoo and Marek Tamm (eds) Tallinn, Varrak, 2008’.” Journal of Baltic Studies 40 (1): 163–165.Google Scholar
Petersoo, Pille. 2008. “Seitse ärevat päeva: eestikeelsete päevalehtede reaktsioon 2007. aasta aprillisündmustele. [Seven anxious days: the reaction of Estonian dailies to the April events of 2007].” In Monumentaalne konflikt: mälu, poliitika ja identiteet tänapäeva Eestis, ed. by Pille Petersoo, and Marek Tamm, 140–154. Tallinn: Varrak.Google Scholar
Pettai, Vello. 2008. “Estonia.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (8): 934–940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00791.xGoogle Scholar
Pääbo, Heiko. 2008. “War of Memories: Explaining ‘Memorials War’ in Estonia.” Baltic Security & Defence Review 101: 5–28.Google Scholar
Saarts, Tõnis, and Leif Kalev. 2009. “Poliitiline kultuur ja Eesti ühiskonna uuenemine [Political culture and the renewal of Estonian society].” Vikerkaar 4/51: 95–104.Google Scholar
Selg, Peeter. 2010. “Toward a Semiotic Model of Democracy.” Applied Semiotics/Sémiotique appliquée 10 (25): 22–54.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Himma-Kadakas, Marju & Ragne Kõuts-Klemm
2023. Developing an Advanced Digital Society: An Estonian Case Study. In Internet in the Post-Soviet Area [Societies and Political Orders in Transition, ], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Selg, Peeter, Georg Sootla & Benjamin Klasche
2023. A Theory of Governance as Problematization and De-problematization. In A Relational Approach to Governing Wicked Problems [Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology, ], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Lauristin, Marju & Sten Hansson
2019. Estonia. In Thirty Years of Political Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe [Political Campaigning and Communication, ], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel
2019. What is political semiotics and why does it matter? A reply to Janar Mihkelsaar. Semiotica 2019:231 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel
2020. From Methodology to Methods and Applications: Introducing Political Form Analysis. In Introducing Relational Political Analysis, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel
2020. Application of Relational Political Analysis: Political Semiotic Explanation of the Constitution of Digital Threats. In Introducing Relational Political Analysis, ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel
2020. Introduction: Political Semiotics as a Theory, Methodology, and Method of Relational Political Analysis. In Introducing Relational Political Analysis, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.