Anti-immigrant political arguments have long been at the centre of the campaigning of the Lega Nord (the Northern League), the Italian extreme-right secessionist party. The paper analyses posters from political campaigns between 2001 and 2008 in order to detect similarities and differences emerging over time, and to show how continuity and change intertwine in the Lega Nord’s anti-immigrant discourse. The analysis is presented across two axes: first, the visual dimensions of the texts are examined, concentrating predominantly on the use of images; and second, we analyse the linguistic content of the leaflets, paying particular attention to referential strategies and argumentative structure. The sampled posters show that although the Lega Nord’s immigration policies have long been driven by an enduring basic antipathy towards foreigners, in the 2008 campaign the strategy shifted to one stressing arguments reminiscent of the Nouvelle Droite’s ethnopluralism. Accordingly, in the interest of respecting cultural diversity, the Lega Nord argues that different national communities need to be kept separate, thereby inverting liberal values for the purpose of countering multiculturalism.
Augoustinous, Martha, Keith Tuffin, and Mark Rapley. 1999. “Genocide or Failure to Gel? Racism, History and Nationalism in Australian Talk.”Discourse & Society 101: 351–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010003004
Avanza, Martina. 2010. “The Northern League and its ‘Innocuous’ Xenophobia.” In Italy Today: The Sick Man of Europe, ed. by Andrea Mammone, and Giuseppe A. Veltri, 131–142. London: Routledge.
Baker, Paul, Costa Gabrielatos, Majiid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.”Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
Billig, Michael. (1991). Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
Blair, J. Anthony. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments.” In Defining Visual Rhetorics, ed. by Charles A. Hill, and Marguerite Helmers, 41–62. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Burridge, Joseph. 2008. “The Dilemma of Frugality and Consumption in British Women’s Magazines 1940–1955.”Social Semiotics 18 (3): 389–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330802217154
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2009. “Seeking in Modern Athens an Answer to the Ancient Jerusalem Question.”Theory Culture Society 261: 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408099016
Cairns, James. 2009. “Politics? Fear not! The Rise of the Average Superhero in the Visual Rhetoric of Bill Davis’ 1971. Election Pamphlet.” In Communicating Canada’s Past: Approaches to the History of Print and Broadcast Media, ed. by Gene Allen, and Daniel J. Robinson, chap. 7. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Cheles, Luciano. 2010. “Back to the Future. The Visual Propaganda of Alleanza Nazionale (1994–2009).”Journal of Modern Italian Studies 15 (2): 232–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545711003606644
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2005. “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.”Discourse & Society 16 (4): 481–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053052
Edwards, Derek. 2003. “Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of MindWorld Relationships”. In Communicating Canada’s Past: Approaches to the History of Print and Broadcast Media, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fella, Stefano, and Carlo Ruzza. 2006. “Changing Political Opportunities and the Nature of the Italian Right.”Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 8 (2): 179–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613190600787344
Groake, Leo. 2002. “Towards a Pragma-dialectics of Visual Argument.” In Advances in Pragma-dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 137–152. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Groarke, Leo. 2007. “Four Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of ISSA, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and Bart Garssen, 535–540. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Ignazi, Piero. 1996. “From Neo-Fascists to Post-Fascists? The Transformation of the MSI into AN.”West European Politics XIX (4): 693–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425161
Ivie, Robert. 1980. “The Metaphor of Force in Prowar Discourse: The Case of 1812.”The Quarterly Journal of Speech 681: 240–253. Reprinted in Critical Questions: Invention, Creativity, and the Criticism of Discourse and Media, ed. by William Nothstine, Carole Blair, and Gary A. Copeland, 264–280. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Jäger, Siegfried, and Jiirgen Link. (1993). Die vierte Geroalt. Rassismus and die Medien. Duisburg: DISS.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Wodak, Ruth. (2009). The Politics of Exclusion. Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Machin, David. (2007). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Arnold.
Malik, Kenan. (1996). The Meaning of Race: Race, History and Culture in Western Society. Palgrave/New York: University Press.
Mammone, Andrea. 2009. “The Eternal Return? Faux Populism and contemporarization of Neo–Fascism across Britain, France and Italy.”Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17 (2): 171–192.
McDonnell, Duncan. 2007. “Beyond the Radical Right Straitjacket: A Reply to Andrej Zaslove’s Critique of ‘Regionalist Populism and the Lega Nord’.”Politics 271: 123–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00289.x
Meyer, Thomas. (2001). Identity Mania: Fundamentalism and the Politicization of Cultural Differences. London, New York: Zed Books.
Mudde, Cas. 1996. “The Paradox of the Anti-Party Party. Insights from the Extreme Right Party.”Politics 21: 265–276.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.”Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
Quasthoff, Uta. 1987. “Linguistic Prejudice/Stereotypes.” In Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, and Klaus J. Mattheier, 785–799. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rapley, Mark. 2001. “How to Do X Without Doing Y?: Accomplishing Discrimination Without ‘Being Racist’ – ‘Doing Equity’.” In Understanding Prejudice, Racism and Social Conflict, ed. by Martha Augoustinous, and Katherine J. Reynolds, 231–250. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218877.n14
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer. London: Sage.
Richardson, John E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Richardson, John E. 2008. “ ‘Our England’: Discourses of ‘Race’ and Class in Party Election Leaflets.”Social Semiotics 18 (3): 321–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330802217105
Richardson, John E. 2009. “ ‘Get Shot of the Lot of ‘em’: Election Reporting of Muslims in British Newspapers.”Patterns of Prejudice 43 (3–4): 355–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313220903109276
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009a. “Recontextualising Fascist Ideologies of the Past: Rightwing Discourses on Employment and Nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.”Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405900903180996
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009b. “The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-Right Parties.”Controversia: An International Journal of Debate and Democratic Renewal 6 (2): 45–77.
Rubinelli, Sara. (2009). Ars Topica. The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Berlin: Springer.
Spektorowski, Alberto. 2000. “The French New Right: Differentialism and the Idea of Ethnophilian Exclusionism.”Polity 33 (2): 283–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235491
Spruce, Damian. 2007. “Empire and Counter-Empire in the Italian Far Right Conflicting Nationalisms and the Split between the Lega Nord and Alleanza Nazionale on Immigration.”Theory, Culture & Society 24 (5): 99–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276407081285
Ter Wal, Jessika. 1996. “The Social Representation of Immigrants: The Pantanella Issue in the Pages of La Repubblica.”New Community 22 (1): 39–66.
Tileaga, Christian. 2006. “Representing the ‘Other’: A Discursive Analysis of Prejudice and Moral Exclusion in Talk about Romanies.”Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 161: 19–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.846
van der Valk, Ineke. 2002. Difference, Deviance, Threat? Mainstream and Right-extremist Political Discourse on Ethnic Issues in the Netherlands and France (1990–1997). Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014003084
van der Valk, Ineke. 2003. “Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France.”Discourse & Society 141: 309–348.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1984). Prejudice in Discourse. An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Dijk, Teun A. (1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, Theo J. 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen RosaCaldas-Coulthard, and Malcom Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo J. 2000. “Visual Racism.” In The Semiotics of Racism- Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak, 333–350. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Verkuyten, Maykel. 2001. “Abnormalization of Ethnic Minorities in Conversation.”British Journal of Social Psychology 401: 257–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601164849
Wetherell, Margaret, and Jonathan Potter. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wodak, Ruth. 2003. “Populist Discourses: The Rhetoric of Exclusion in Written Genres.”Document Design 4 (2): 132–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod
Wodak, Ruth, and Bern Matouscheck. 1993. “We Are Dealing with People Whose Origins One Can Clearly Tell Just by Looking’: Critical Discourse Analysis and the Study of Neo-Racism in Contemporary Austria.”Discourse & Society 4 (2): 225–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002005
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk (eds). (2000). Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.
Zaslove, Andrej. 2004. “The Dark Side of European Politics: Unmasking the Radical Right.”Journal of European Integration 26 (1): 61–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0703633042000197799
2024. What Are Crises for? The Effects on Users’ Engagement in the 2022 Italian Election. Politics and Governance 12
Kleinert, Manuel
2024. Reconsidering the Relationship Between Anti-immigration Attitudes and Preferences for the AfD Using Implicit Attitudes Measures. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 65:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Moffitt, Benjamin
2024. How Do Populists Visually Represent ‘The People’? A Systematic Comparative Visual Content Analysis of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders’ Instagram Accounts. The International Journal of Press/Politics 29:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Quassoli, Fabio, Marta Muchetti & Monica Colombo
2023. “I’m Told I Don’t Look Like a Foreigner”: Everyday Racism in Contemporary Italy. Social Inclusion 11:2
2022. ‘Immigrants, hell on board’. Journal of Language and Discrimination
Kosman, Marcin
2022. Polish Multimodal Far-Right Discourse. Election Spots of Grzegorz Braun. In Concepts, Discourses, and Translations [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 187 ff.
Bartikowski, Boris, Fernando Fastoso & Heribert Gierl
2021. How Nationalistic Appeals Affect Foreign Luxury Brand Reputation: A Study of Ambivalent Effects. Journal of Business Ethics 169:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Berti, Carlo
2021. The Discursive Construction of Migration and Democracy in the European Parliament: A Model of Reciprocal Influence Between Populists and Non-populists Through Polarization and Fragmentation. In The Impact of Populism on European Institutions and Civil Society, ► pp. 69 ff.
Devillanova, Carlo
2021. Tolerant or segregated? Immigration and electoral outcomes in urban areas. Papers in Regional Science 100:2 ► pp. 495 ff.
Di Mauro, Danilo & Vincenzo Memoli
2021. Instrumental explanations of attitudes towards immigrants during the “refugee crisis”: Evidence from Italy. International Social Science Journal 71:239-240 ► pp. 49 ff.
Ricucci, Roberta
2021. Interrupted Routes: Migratory Itineraries and Rhetoric Concerning Difference—News from Italy. In Ethnicity, Identity and Faith in the Current Migratory Crisis, ► pp. 19 ff.
Schmidtke, Oliver
2021. ‘We the People’: Demarcating the Demos in Populist Mobilization—The Case of the Italian Lega. Social Sciences 10:10 ► pp. 351 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris, Carlo Raimondo, Stavros Assimakopoulos, Sara Greco & Andrea Rocci
2021. Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’. Discourse & Communication 15:5 ► pp. 559 ff.
Sasha Souillard
2021. La Rivoluzione Macchiata: The Stained Revolution. The Interdependent: Journal of Undergraduate Research in Global Studies 2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Tessitore, Francesca & Giorgia Margherita
2021. Female Nigerian asylum seekers in Italy: An exploration of gender identity dimensions through an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Care for Women International 42:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Vianello, Francesca Alice & Angela M. Toffanin
2021. Young adult migrants’ representation of ethnic, gender and generational disadvantage in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies 44:1 ► pp. 154 ff.
Casaglia, Anna, Raffaella Coletti, Christopher Lizotte, John Agnew, Virginie Mamadouh & Claudio Minca
2020. Interventions on European nationalist populism and bordering in time of emergencies. Political Geography 82 ► pp. 102238 ff.
Cervi, Laura
2020. Exclusionary Populism and Islamophobia: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Spain. Religions 11:10 ► pp. 516 ff.
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
Gottlob, Anita & Hajo Boomgaarden
2020. The 2015 refugee crisis, uncertainty and the media: Representations of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in Austrian and French media. Communications 45:s1 ► pp. 841 ff.
Jenks, Christopher J. & Aditi Bhatia
2020. Infesting our country: discursive illusions in anti-immigration border talk. Language and Intercultural Communication 20:2 ► pp. 81 ff.
Knoblock, Natalia
2020. Negotiating dominance on Facebook: Positioning of self and others in pro- and anti-Trump comments on immigration. Discourse & Society 31:5 ► pp. 520 ff.
Rheindorf, Markus
2020. Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 622 ff.
Yamboliev, Kalina
2019. Italian Narratives of Oppositional Identity. Studies in Late Antiquity 3:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Castelli Gattinara, Pietro
2018. Europeans, Shut the Borders! Anti-refugee Mobilisation in Italy and France. In Solidarity Mobilizations in the ‘Refugee Crisis’, ► pp. 271 ff.
Colombo, Monica
2018. The Representation of the “European Refugee Crisis” in Italy: Domopolitics, Securitization, and Humanitarian Communication in Political and Media Discourses. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16:1-2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
2017. Analysis of Online Comments to News Reports. In Online Hate Speech in the European Union [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 25 ff.
Kopytowska, Monika & Łukasz Grabowski
2017. European Security Under Threat: Mediating the Crisis and Constructing the Other. In National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis, ► pp. 83 ff.
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do & Paul G. Renigar
2016. Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 71 ff.
Feighery, William
2015. Right-Wing Visual Rhetoric and Switzerland’s Tourism Image. In Tourism Research Frontiers: Beyond the Boundaries of Knowledge [Tourism Social Science Series, 20], ► pp. 105 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.